Ever since he had the brilliant idea of inflating a huge elastic sleeve in the cave to rescue those boys who got stuck in the cave in Thailand, I’ve not taken Elon Musk very seriously when he unburdens himself of these brainstorms.
I would be worried about after the virus treatment the desire to trans oneself.
I’ll take mine with vodka and lime
We use to take Chloroquine when doing missions in Africa.
I remember one trip were a coworker was taking his pills as directed, we had to up his dose to treat him for malaria.
Sides effects are real when you up the dose.
I would rather take forsythia instead of anything Musk recommends.
Some people here are joking about this but, it is a serious thing.
Reports from China and South Korea is they have been using this substance successfully. Laura Ingraham had a doctor from John Hopkins on her show last night that confirms the effectiveness in a clinical trial they conducted.
I have taken this drug in my past life. It is an anti-malarial drug. It’s said to work by opening a path for zinc to enter the virus and prevent it from replicating.
Is this quinine water?
previously discussed on FR last week.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3823805/posts
But, i did find this about zinc needing the chloroquine to have a gateway into the cell....Chloroquine & Zinc Treatment Combo
Coronavirus Epidemic Update 34: US Cases Surge, Chloroquine & Zinc Treatment Combo, Italy Lockdown
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7F1cnWup9M&feature=youtu.be&app=desktop
Pulmonologist & critical care specialist Roger Seheult, MD of MedCram dot com
Colloidal silver has been known for thousands of years as a very effective bactericide and virucide
everybody knows this
the government knows this
and they just wont admit it because I can show you how to make it for free
The vaccine business is $100 billion a year or more nobody really knows
They have over 150 different vaccines that they would love for the government to mandate you to take- at $50 a pop
Vaccines cause enormous damage to people because it’s not a regulated industry; there’s all kinds of adjuncts in them ; they are stored for months and years ; and injecting forign DNA into your body has unknown attributes as well
There is right now a $5 billion fund that the government created to pay off all the poor parents his children’s lives were ruined by the vaccine industry
Now don’t get me wrong - I’m not totally against vaccines; but they are not I repeat not ! the answer
The best thing to do is keep healthy supply of silver ion in your blood and this will prevent bugs from getting you
Discussions of the efficacy of using chloroquine or hydroxyhloroquine on SARS-CoV-2 have been out there for a number of weeks and I’ve been reading some of the lab studies. The concern is the dosage required might be worse than the disease itself because of its potential for liver damage.
The first SARS outbreak led them down the road to researching chloroquine in regards to treating Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome and let’s hope they can overcome the contraindications and make it work.
https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-422X-2-69/figures/2
The tweet also included a link to the study, penned by Dr Thomas R. Broker from the Stanford University School of Medicine and colleagues.BUT, denisgoddard at Peak Prosperity wrote "Chloroquine HOAX!.He has since followed the tweet with: "Hydroxychloroquine probably better"
Published on March 13 this year, the study examines guidelines issued by China and South Korea on the effectiveness of chloroquine as an antiviral remedy.
Yesterday I saw an article circulating that appears to be an academic paper inexplicably published on a little-used decentralzied Internet system called IPFS: https://ipfs.infura.io/ipfs/QmNcF4usFUJdGjTMtEXT1XAYybJvtLmEjaZnvNXN2n91Zh/Indeed! I Googled "Thomas broker" PhD stanford and got the same SINGLE hit: https://www.uab.edu/medicine/biochem/faculty-staff-sidebar/other-faculty/56-tom-broker-phd.It sure looked legit. I was so distracted by knowing (as an IT guy) that IPFS is a legit Internet standard (of which I am a particular fan), it’s only a few minutes ago I bothered trying to find any other information about the authors of the paper.
Oh my God, now I am looking, it’s an *obvious* hoax. I really want to know who perpetrated it.
I DuckDuckGo searched ‘Thomas R. Broker, PhD Stanford ‘, and the top result sure looked legit from the preview:
Biography. Tom Broker (b. 1944) received his B.A. in Chemistry from Wesleyan University (Middletown CT, 1966), followed by a Ph.D. in Biochemistry from Stanford School of Medicine (1972) for electron microscopic and genetic studies of bacteriophage T4 DNA recombination pathways, structures and DNA branch migration in the laboratory of Robert Lehman.
However, the URL this purports to be a preview of actually just redirects to what appears to be a department homepage; see screenshot.
Somebody appears to have gone to some trouble to quietly take control of the uab.edu webserver, get a page there top-ranked on search engines for an expected query, and then erase the page. I’d love to know who was behind this hoax.
A full professor with only ONE publication and that is way AFTER her retired? Now that would be a first.
But, when you search for Tom Broker at the UAB web site, you find "Broker, Tom, Ph.D.; Professor (Retired).
See: https://www.uab.edu/medicine/biochem/faculty/broker
It's all rather strange.
It will be interesting what the FDA will say about this. If you look at their crooked past history, they will condemn the idea that it works.
I have seen Chloroquine mentioned a few times in the last couple of days.
Pronounced, "It couldn't hoit."
Astronaut. Doctor. Web entrepreneur. Electric carmaker. Is there anything this guy CAN’T do?
Gee, I have a supply of Cinchona Bark in my basement for my home-brew bitters. :-)
I have 200 pills of Hydroxychloroquine in my kitchen cabinet.
As far as I can see, Chloroquine looks promising, but has not been fully investigated or tested. Perhaps the CDC should look into this during their testing the vaccine to fight the Wuhan Covid-19.
It’s been widely used to fight Malaria in the past.
As far as I can see, Chloroquine looks promising, but has not been fully investigated or tested. Perhaps the CDC should look into this during their testing the vaccine to fight the Wuhan Covid-19.
It’s been widely used to fight Malaria in the past.