Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: djpg
To me, the bigger issue is that of requiring insurance companies to cover contraception, which is not a health issue except in some dangerously broad definition of "health."

One of the great ironies of this issue is that insurance companies actually have a HUGE incentive to cover contraception. It's cheaper for the to pay for contraception than for the costs of maternity care, childbirth, and pediatric care.

Better yet ... this is a huge incentive for EMPLOYERS to insist that their insurers cover the cost of contraceptives.

26 posted on 07/09/2020 6:45:48 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("We're human beings ... we're not f#%&ing animals." -- Dennis Rodman, 6/1/2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

The mandate, therefore, helps the insurance companies. But if there were no such mandate, people could buy policies that don’t include contraception for less money. Companies that offer such policies, perhaps smaller companies, would find a market for their products.


29 posted on 07/09/2020 7:23:05 AM PDT by djpg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson