Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

COVID-19 booster shots 90% effective against Omicron hospitalization: CDC
CDC via Yahoo ^ | Feb 21, 2022

Posted on 01/22/2022 7:30:30 PM PST by entropy12

Yahoo Finance's Anjalee Khemlani discusses how the CDC says the COVID-19 booster shots are effective against the Omicron variant.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 000zeroeffectiveness; anjaleekhemlani; booster; cdc; covid; faucipaid; fauciwrotethis; finance; goalposts; infinitejabs; lyingcdc; yahoo; yahoofinance; zeroeffectiveness
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last
To: entropy12
The study: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7104e3.htm?s_cid=mm7104e3_w. There are no comparison groups. They are comparing hospitalized with and without vaccination but have no numbers for non-hospitalized for the with and without vaccine groups to compare against.
41 posted on 01/22/2022 8:07:47 PM PST by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Not being vaccinated seems to be at least 90% effective for keeping Omicron (aka the January common cold) from putting you in the hospital too.


42 posted on 01/22/2022 8:13:02 PM PST by Bryanw92
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

43 posted on 01/22/2022 8:15:38 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Nietzsche: “Everything the State says is a lie. Everything the State has, was stolen!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

90% effective at preventing hospitalizations…what does that mean? Does it mean that 10% of boosted individuals got hospitalized? Does it mean that 10% of hospitalizations happened to be boosted individuals? Does it mean unvaccinated individuals were 90% more likely to be hospitalized than boosted individuals? It’s vague to the point of having no meaning. And of course Yahoo doesn’t provide a link to the original source, study, or data that was used to make the claim. I never trust an article that doesn’t link to the study or the data.


44 posted on 01/22/2022 8:15:48 PM PST by Meah (The terrain is everything. ~Louis Pasteur )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Ahh OK! I’m on board. It’s even better than before! Where can I get my booster? Can I still get the booster, even if I’ve never had the vacine?


45 posted on 01/22/2022 8:16:59 PM PST by D Rider ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

I’m not going to trade 36 hours of headache, nausea, chills and hot flash MISERY in order to “prevent” 36 hours of mild sniffles.

NO DEAL.


46 posted on 01/22/2022 8:17:42 PM PST by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

“You can stick your vaccine ‘booster’ up your arse”


47 posted on 01/22/2022 8:18:41 PM PST by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
Key word is Hospitalization, not Prevention.

Exacly. Let's look at the actual FDA and Pfizer-BioNTech info.

Per the FDA's website,

On August 23, 2021, the FDA approved the first COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty, for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older.(emphasis added)

Per the Comernity Insert,

--------------------------- INDICATIONS AND USAGE----------------------------
COMIRNATY is a vaccine indicated for active immunization to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in individuals 16 years of age and older. (1)(emphasis added>

Per the Summary Basis for Regulatory Action, under "Indication"

Active immunization to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in individuals 16 years of age and older. (Emphasis added)

Clearly, the vaccine is for PREVENTION. Nothing else. All of the clinical trials (limited as they were) and statistical confidence intervals were focused on Vaccine Efficacay (VE) with regard to PREVENTION...not hospitalization, not ER visits, and not symptoms. Accordingly, THAT is the basis upon which these shots should be evaluated.

This isn't science...it's political science.

48 posted on 01/22/2022 8:18:50 PM PST by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s^2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Not having a booster is 97% effective against hospitalization.


49 posted on 01/22/2022 8:21:52 PM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bayard

it had a low hospitalization rate even before it landed on American soil.

People in South Africa were giddy with what the numbers they were seeing.


50 posted on 01/22/2022 8:22:16 PM PST by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: D Rider

And, from what I’ve read here, if you get the booster you only have a one in ten chance of being hospitalized!


51 posted on 01/22/2022 8:23:04 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

I bet the numbers are like 0.9 vs 0.1, lies with stats


52 posted on 01/22/2022 8:23:08 PM PST by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
They forgot to add, "...for now." at the end of the declaration.

Does anyone really believe these "experts" anymore?
53 posted on 01/22/2022 8:23:09 PM PST by Antoninus (Republicans are all honorable men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

@ post 18 - chuckled out loud! Then looked up and had a sad sigh....


54 posted on 01/22/2022 8:23:39 PM PST by week 71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

They’re playing Whack-A-Mole with the human race.


55 posted on 01/22/2022 8:24:22 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ProfessorGoldiloxx

Moderna’s booster is a half dose of the original.


56 posted on 01/22/2022 8:24:48 PM PST by FreedomForce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sicon

57 posted on 01/22/2022 8:26:49 PM PST by Thunder90 (All posts soley represent my own opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Thanks for finding this piece of propaganda and your reminder that “no vaccine ever built a virus proof filter in nose.”


58 posted on 01/22/2022 8:29:14 PM PST by fireman15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
Do the experimental mRNA based vaccines create anti-bodies?

Yes.

I have no data to prove for or against it.

More than copious amounts of data for that.

59 posted on 01/22/2022 8:30:15 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869

Cases are not hospitalizations.


60 posted on 01/22/2022 8:31:19 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson