Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Is the FDA’s Juul Ban Supposed to Help?
The New American ^ | June 30, 2022 | Veronique de Rugy

Posted on 07/01/2022 8:28:01 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

There’s something terrifying about a government so powerful that it can shut down your business overnight without even bothering to offer substantive arguments. Yet that’s what Food and Drug Administration bureaucrats just did to the e-cigarette company Juul. While Juul got a stay of execution from a court, the company is one of the many victims of the FDA’s counterproductive war on nicotine. Most of the other victims will be cigarette smokers.

I have followed the issue for several years and there is no doubt in my mind that Juul is an effective way to transition away from smoking into alternative, safer sources of nicotine. Vaping doesn’t end nicotine consumption, but it’s still a real step toward a world without cigarettes. In fact, it is now proven that e-cigarettes are more effective than traditional, FDA-approved nicotine-replacement therapies at getting smokers to quit entirely.

In its 125,000-page application to the FDA, Juul reminded the agency of more than 110 studies showing the benefits of e-cigarettes over traditional nicotine consumption. The company has also been a good team player, jumping through all the hoops thrown at it by the anti-vaping brigades. As the Reason Foundation’s Guy Bentley reminds us in the Daily News, “Juul complied with nearly every request made by critics including pulling its original marketing campaigns in 2016, voluntarily removing all of its non-tobacco and menthol flavors from the market in 2019, and supporting an increase in the tobacco age from 18 to 21.”

And yet the FDA has ordered all Juul e-cigarette products off the market even though its own decision features this remarkable admission: “To date, the FDA has not received clinical information to suggest an immediate hazard associated with the use of the JUUL device or JUULpods.” In other words, neither Juul’s effectiveness in turning smokers away from more dangerous...

(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: ban; fda; juul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: mewzilla

“Meanwhile, Deep State is all for legalizing weed.”


If the Deep State wanted legal weed, it would been legalized years ago. Instead, they’ve fought tooth and nail against it. You have to ask yourself why it was never legalized federally when Obama and the dems controlled fedgov.

Answer: The Deep State does not want to give up billions in untaxed, underground money and the power that drug laws give to it.


21 posted on 07/01/2022 11:05:46 AM PDT by Ken H (Trump /DeSantis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The Big Guy and the democrats. This is just to let EVERYONE know if you don’t pay your patronage you will be destroyed.


22 posted on 07/01/2022 11:15:15 AM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Not that I’m a smoker,I’m not but what the hell is the FDA doing?They are ordering that Juuls are taken off of the market because of what?They’re dangerous.

While at the same time they are pushing a known deadly “Vaccine” on the market and they’re allowing it to be injected into 5 month old toddlers.

The FDA Leadership is corrupt and should be ignored like the rest of the Biden administration.


23 posted on 07/01/2022 11:40:27 AM PDT by puppypusher (The world is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

Altria (formerly Philip Morris) owns JUUL.

Somehow your theory about tobacco being responsible for the vaping ban falls rather flat with that little snippet of info...


24 posted on 07/01/2022 12:00:44 PM PDT by Don W (When blacks riot, neighborhoods and cities burn. When whites riot, nations and continents burn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Wait. The state schools can convince your kids that they are another gender, kids can get body damaging puberty blocking hormones without parent consent. Adolescent girls can have breasts removed and boys get their junk removed all with the FDA’s blessing and consent. But woe unto those that want to vape juul, even though there is no evidence of harm. Insane and evil.


25 posted on 07/01/2022 12:06:47 PM PDT by gracefullyparanoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alvin Diogenes
Doesn’t this run afoul of yesterday’s Supreme Court ruling? Congress would have to pass this as a law, rather than letting unelected bureaucrats issue an edict.

Congress authorized the FDA to regulate tobacco products in 2009. They extended that to synthetic nicotine in 2022. Although most nicotine is tobacco derived, vape makers tried to get around the FDA by using synthetic.

26 posted on 07/01/2022 12:22:03 PM PDT by IndispensableDestiny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Vape pens = drug delivery device


27 posted on 07/01/2022 12:38:43 PM PDT by Drango (1776 = 2022 = 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
Vape pens = drug delivery device

What are free government crack pipes?

https://freebeacon.com/biden-administration/yes-safe-smoking-kits-include-free-crack-pipes-we-know-because-we-got-them/

28 posted on 07/01/2022 12:52:02 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Contempt for pre-born human life breeds contempt for post-born human life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Is Juul the only E-cigarette on the market?
If not, what is the difference between their product and the others?


29 posted on 07/01/2022 12:57:32 PM PDT by Doctor Congo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don W

Perhaps there is one of the other tobacco companies they wish to help and not Altria.


30 posted on 07/01/2022 12:59:38 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Great minds drink alike...me and my baby havin' a hell of a night. - - BB King)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Congo

Juul put a target on themselves by 5% nicotine in fruit flavors when all competitors were half or less that much.

A convenience store manager showed me a printout that showed 90% of Juul buyers were under 21. That was several years ago. He also said that young employees stocked up big time on fruit flavors before they were banned.

Teens are moving on to other brands such as Puff Bar. Targeting Juul at this point is even more ridiculous than it was initially.


31 posted on 07/01/2022 1:13:34 PM PDT by jjotto ( Blessed are You LORD, who crushes enemies and subdues the wicked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Tar is not the only culprit. The hot smoke itself is damaging to the lungs. Juul has no tar and no hot smoke. Perhaps it is seen as a competitor to favored tobacco companies.
32 posted on 07/01/2022 2:09:08 PM PDT by arthurus (covfefe x)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
There’s something terrifying about a government so powerful that it can shut down your business overnight without even bothering to offer substantive arguments.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Yeah. Just ask Arthur Andersen & Co.

33 posted on 07/01/2022 2:17:38 PM PDT by Disestablishmentarian (The next war has already started. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IndispensableDestiny

I don’t know where the line is, but Congress had authorized the EPA to regulate the environment also, and the Supreme Court ruled that the authority given wasn’t specific enough, if I understand it correctly (I haven’t read the ruling yet, so maybe I don’t have it right).

Congress probably didn’t intend to ban vaping products when it approved the FDA regulatory authority over synthetic nicotine. If Congress had wanted to ban them, they would have just done so.


34 posted on 07/01/2022 5:41:13 PM PDT by Alvin Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson