Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/10/2023 8:35:55 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer

I am not going there.


2 posted on 02/10/2023 8:37:36 AM PST by ActresponsiblyinVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

SF is due for another “big one” in the next few decades.

While many modern buildings may survive most of the city is still a death-trap in a major quake.

It is hilarious when leftists in San Francisco talk about “sustainable development” while they live adjacent to a major earthquake fault line.


3 posted on 02/10/2023 8:38:36 AM PST by cgbg (Claiming that laws and regs that limit “hate speech” stop freedom of speech is “hate speech”.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

If you have to resort to “hey, we aint as bad as when we were a smoking ruin after the earthquake” you are probably a failure as a mayor.


4 posted on 02/10/2023 8:38:41 AM PST by shadowlands1960 (We live in a world of intolerance masked as tolerance. RUSH LIMBAUGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Breed recounted how even though the city has struggled to return to its pre-pandemic state, downtown San Francisco was in far worse shape after the 1906 earthquake.

That's quite an excuse. "We leftists have emptied out San Francisco and turned it into a zombie-filled wasteland but at least we didn't do as much damage as the biggest earthquake in recorded US history did."
5 posted on 02/10/2023 8:38:47 AM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
“You know what? That's OK,” Breed said.

Not OK if you own property or a business there....buy F' em, right London?

6 posted on 02/10/2023 8:40:09 AM PST by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Damn she’s dumb. The population of everywhere in the US (especially in an important port city) was increasing over the next 100 years, so of course it recovered.
Office space is going to get really cheap, or they’re going to have to offer some ridiculous sweetheart incentives to fill them.


9 posted on 02/10/2023 8:41:30 AM PST by rivercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

[[San Francisco was in far worse shape after the 1906 earthquake]]

yeah but back then, insanity didn’t reign Supreme in liberals areas quite like it does today. Everyone was able to work together and rebuild. So,etching that seems impossible today


11 posted on 02/10/2023 8:42:48 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

But the human feces will remain.


12 posted on 02/10/2023 8:43:33 AM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

San Franshithole.


14 posted on 02/10/2023 8:44:07 AM PST by Herodes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Ha ha, it’s so bad she has to compare it to the 1907 earthquake to find a worse time. What a moron loser.


16 posted on 02/10/2023 8:47:47 AM PST by Newtoidaho (All I ask of living is to have no chains on me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Wow—declaring victory because SanFran isn’t the ash heap which followed the Great Earthquake and subsequent fire of 1906. The mayor sets a very low bar for success.


18 posted on 02/10/2023 8:49:27 AM PST by NautiNurse (There was a 2022 mid-term Red Wave...in Florida! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

not while democrats are in charge!


19 posted on 02/10/2023 8:50:24 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The idiot mayor is conflating damage from an earthquake with the decay resulting from moral rot and economic decline caused by businesses fleeing a place that is no longer an attractive or safe place to operate a business.


20 posted on 02/10/2023 8:50:55 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

It won’t be coming back with that attitude by its fearful leader.


21 posted on 02/10/2023 8:58:42 AM PST by Ge0ffrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“ Breed recounted how even though the city has struggled to return to its pre-pandemic state, downtown San Francisco was in far worse shape after the 1906 earthquake.”

In truth, it is far easier for a physically ruined city to be rebuilt by an industrious populace than it is to repair complete cultural and moral rot.


23 posted on 02/10/2023 9:05:27 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

as we knew it


24 posted on 02/10/2023 9:06:06 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

It was once a beautiful place, back in the 70s, but I wouldn’t go there, at gunpoint, now.


25 posted on 02/10/2023 9:10:10 AM PST by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Used to enjoy that city but that was an age ago. The problem here isn’t, as the Dems continue to rationalize, the pandemic. And the difference between now and 1906 is that now the steps necessary to recover are blocked at every step by ideology and bureaucracy. This wasn’t a natural disaster, it was strictly manufactured by people who never learn and are more than willing to drag everyone around them down with them.


26 posted on 02/10/2023 9:17:19 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“In 1907, downtown was mostly rubble and ash. That’s considerably worse than today’s shift in how people are working,”


Yep, SF came back bigger and better after 1906. There’s a film shot from a cable car going down Market Street a couple of days before the quake (You can find it on YouTube). While there are scruffy looking people, they are all working. There are no passed out ‘unhoused’ people lying about. I seriously doubt that either the city government or the city’s population would have tolerated such behavior in 1906.

Insurance companies made a point of settling claims in gold—real money back in the day. And the idea of the city proposing to compensate victims of slavery (and there well could have been some in S.F. in 1906) would not have been entertained.

So yes, politically things are different now, but not in a good way.


27 posted on 02/10/2023 9:19:45 AM PST by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Breed recounted how even though the city has struggled to return to its pre-pandemic state, downtown San Francisco was in far worse shape after the 1906 earthquake.

Well, if that's your comparison....

28 posted on 02/10/2023 9:20:13 AM PST by Rummyfan (In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized of man. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson