I guess it would be illegal to finish the assailant off, after he stated that following his recovery he will return and kill the family.
Confusing, isn’t it?
“…deputies said the round went through several layers of the home’s drywall, endangering those inside”
“Several layers”? That means at least two walls. Might diminish your chances of hitting the target, no?
Isn’t an invader intent on harm, murder, and kidnapping more of a danger? What a stupid remark by the deputies.
I think the most probable interpretation is that Mr. Arbogast is either the father of the 5-month-old child or believes he is the father.
Well - that right there tells ya what he should get! ....imho
***and continued to state that after he recovered, he would kill [the victim],” according to the complaint. ***
Sounds like a good reason to “accidentally” fire a kill shot, like putting down a mad dog.
I am reminded of the movie CUJO. The audience is yelling “SHOOT HIM AGAIN!” but the cop does not and......