Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Meltdown of Commercial Real Estate
Brownstone Institute ^ | March 25, 2024 | Peter St Onge

Posted on 03/25/2024 1:35:01 PM PDT by Heartlander

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: Heartlander
Everybody seems to be working from home these days, in their pajamas.

Not sure how we recover from this.

41 posted on 03/25/2024 5:32:14 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (6,575,474 Truth | 87,429,044 Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caver
That’s total bullshit.

That is what people who build office buildings and high-rise condos tell me.

I trust their experience and opinion more than yours.

Their explanation is that water and sewer facilities in an office building are laid out in a central core with very few branches to the restrooms and break rooms. In a condo, the lines have a much denser branch structure that needs to reach each apartment with a much higher maximum capacity on each branch.

During the commercial breaks of the Super Bowl, you might have 2/3 of the residents scoot off to the can and then flush all at about the same instant. The peak load from apartments can be way higher than anything you could find in an office building during a lunch break.

Gotta plan for these things, you know.

HVAC systems have analogous problems with centralized chillers/heaters and ventilation. The zones in an office are way too big for apartment spaces and the vents are too few to work in apartment spaces.

You want the thermostat that controls your apartment to be located three units down the hall? I thought thermostat arguments in a common office space were nasty.

All this stuff can be changed. That change is expensive and amounts to gutting the whole building and replacing everything in it. Maybe one such project will be commissioned in one city as a virtue signaling effort to the rest of the nation.

The opportunities for graft and bribes ought to be spectacular. But I would bet that the project will run late, over budget, and will never be fully completed. And there won't be another one. We will have too many other problems more important than caring what is happening to bankrupt commercial property owners or where the illegals are living.

42 posted on 03/25/2024 5:44:38 PM PDT by flamberge (It turns out that you can fool most of the people, most of the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
Conversion to taxpayer-funded dormitories for illegals, complete with communal bathrooms and no need to cook government-provided food?

Sounds like a prison. Better add a substantial budget for riot control. Might need some confinement rooms too. About 80 percent of the illegal migrants are single military-aged men. Many are experienced criminals who have been turned out of their home country prison systems by their governments. They won't be easy to control in large numbers in confined spaces.

Cheaper to just build concentration camps (err... "resettlement centers") somewhere out on the plains. And that may very well be what we end up doing.

The property owners are going to lose their shirts. The regional banks that hold mortgages will likewise fall. The larger megabanks have enough clout to get generous federal program loans or grants and will buy up the vacant properties at pennies on the dollar. Some properties will literally change hands for one dollar.

There are a lot of possibilities when you can acquire large tracts of land for one dollar. Who cares what building was on it.

Your comment about "figure out a new scam to trick investors" is right on the mark.

43 posted on 03/25/2024 6:16:47 PM PDT by flamberge (It turns out that you can fool most of the people, most of the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

I find the responders to this post to be much too kind.

In addition to the many and varied problems, nearly insoluble problems, mentioned in the article we probably ought to take a look at the Detroit example.

Demographic shifts, governance shifts, industrial base migration and extinction, loss of reputation as a “good place to live for families”. All this piles up on a region and on the economies and banks of a region.

Don’t invest in banks doing real estate business in the stressed major cities: L.A, San Francisco, New York, Chicago. Chicago looks like it is circling the drain already.


44 posted on 03/25/2024 6:26:56 PM PDT by 2manydegrees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flamberge

Working on an office conversion project right now, and the points you raise are all correct. You basically have to strip out all of the Office HVAC and Plumbing, and come up with a new layout for risers that work for the apartment layouts. The facade will probably need work as well. It’s almost impossible to lease or sell a residential unit without at least one operable window.

The real reason that there aren’t more conversions though doesn’t have to do with the ducts and the pipes and the electrical service, or even the exterior wall. It’s the basic geometry of the building. It’s easy to see once you know what to look for. In office buildings, the core to glass distance can be 35-40 feet. A resi unit wants to be about half of that, because no one wants a long, dark series of rooms and then one room with a big window on one side. No one would live there willingly, let alone rent or buy it.

Long story short, converting any meaningful amount of the downtown office inventory to commercial is not going to work, ever.


45 posted on 03/25/2024 8:10:55 PM PDT by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: flamberge

Commercial buildings may not be suitable for conversion to residential property, but will that stop the government from spending thin air money on such projects?


46 posted on 03/25/2024 8:28:22 PM PDT by yawningotter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: yawningotter
Commercial buildings may not be suitable for conversion to residential property, but will that stop the government from spending thin air money on such projects?

No, it will not.

What will stop such projects is a conspicuous failure of the first one, followed by pressing demands for higher priority activities with better and safer grifting opportunities for the sponsors.

The other factor is that we are starting to see major violent criminal activities from immigrant gangs which will personally threaten our current rulers and their families. They are about to discover that they cannot control the illegal immigrants they have worked so hard to bring into this country as compliant replacements for the native population.

The "newcomers" are not all going to be compliant slaves.

For a young single man who is an illegal immigrant, membership in an organized criminal gang pays a whole lot better than waiting around for a welfare deposit on an EBT card. And with perhaps ten million young men (16-45) in this category, a certain percentage will take up with the gangs. The absolute number will be quite large.

It won't matter as long as these men confine their predations to working class or middle-class natives. But the burglaries and home invasions are already starting to hit the upscale gated communities. As this continues, it will change a great number of priorities for the politicians. The rulers who buy and sell the politicians will see to that.

What will stop office-to-residential conversion projects is a decision by our rulers to spend that money instead on high-end security measures for the gated communities in which they live. They will also spend money to move the illegals "somewhere else". Like that small town where you thought you could move to escape the problems of the big city.

After all, what good is a multi-million dollar grifting deal from a conversion project if the sponsors can get killed in a home invasion from an immigrant criminal gang. Especially when the project is filled with gang members taking a cut from the deal who want a bigger cut than sponsors want to pay.

Maybe they can start another big war far away and draft the illegals to go away and fight in it. They can promise them "a pathway to citizenship". Whatever the rulers do to protect themselves will be too expensive and too important to waste available funds on virtue signaling projects like an office-to-residential conversion.

There just won't be very many of them for a combination of reasons, the least of which is that they are impractical.

47 posted on 03/25/2024 9:28:38 PM PDT by flamberge (It turns out that you can fool most of the people, most of the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

The Feds will soon fill them up with our newly arrived replacements.


48 posted on 03/26/2024 1:32:16 AM PDT by Iron Munro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Why can’t they buy their own insurance?


49 posted on 03/26/2024 6:20:21 AM PDT by Kenny500c ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kenny500c

Buying insurance for cash flow to support your operations kind of defeats the purpose. The money moves very quickly between accounts, so the insurance would probably be difficult to underwrite among multiple parties.


50 posted on 03/26/2024 7:19:49 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson