I knew this was going to happen once they started using Legos.
If the alphabets say it was not terrorism, it was terrorism.
“Steve Bannon noted Tuesday that the official explanation of what happened “doesn’t make sense.” He asked “how the ship turned directly into that [pylon] and the pilot didn’t drop the anchor? Dropping the anchor might’ve ripped the front of the ship apart, but it wouldn’t have taken out the bridge.””
When did Steve Bannon become an expert on 100,000 ton ships?
This is bigger than 911 and maybe even Watergate! /s
The most likely cause was the owners of the ship skimping on maintenance.
Bannon was dead frigging wrong about the anchor not being dropped.
Way go Steve, open your show with bullshit.
He’s a circus show barker trying to fleece the rubes .
There were photos of the ship with the anchor dropped. The fat slob can’t wait to get on the air and talk crap.
A frigging clown 🤡
So far no evidence that it was an intentional attack. It certainly should be investigated carefully, but by who? There are almost no credible authorities left in the USA.
Curious what black person the new bridge will be named after because you know is sure as hell won't be named after Francis Scott Key.
“Tragic boat accident.”
🤔
Why don’t The Powers That Be simply take the technology that was going to be applied to building a temporary port for the Gaza Strip, and setting it up OUTSIDE the collapsed bridge? That would be a good use of available resources, and get the port of Baltimore back into operation at limited capacity.
Concentrate on the reopening of the channel with all deliberate speed, and most of the rest of the port can be back in gear within months, not years.
Reconstructing the bridge is a separate priority.
From the videos, it looks like the ship took a hard turn to starboard. Why?
Made that point yesterday. But the BIG issue is that many others in America likely reached the same conclusion because of distrust in our government.
Thanks, Brandon.
He’s excluding something as he admits he doesn’t know anything.
Where is “Pistol” Pete Buttigieg at on this? You know “The United States Secretary of Transportation”. Seems like there’s been a lot of this happening since Pete was put in charge, trains derailing, doors and wheels falling off of airplanes, 30 tons of ammonium nitrate disappearing and now ships running into bridges. Pete, please pick up the white courtesy phone.
One of these fellows told me in detail of how, through some college/military program related in some way to the CIA (sorry, can't recall what) he was asked to write a paper detail how to take down New York City. He talked of transportation and communication, beginning with the bridges. Obvious, you say? It was an assignment to college freshman in 1970's. For all its obviousness, it seems to have been the product of some consideration. It was a plan.
My recollection of his "plan" was called immediately to memory when reading that the destruction of the bridge was an “‘absolutely brilliant strategic attack’ on US critical infrastructure – most likely cyber – & our intel agencies know it.” Sure, they know it. They've been making it a freshman project for how many years now?
All to say that, while am repelled by knee-jerk conspiracy-type theses, I certainly agree with the assertion that the IC knows a good plan for domestic destruction when it sees one.
And I lean towards trusting Horowitz's judgment.
“Boat”
Illegal Alien Express Train Bridge
Taxpayers Chain Gang Railroad Bridge
“Maybe the pilot panicked. Maybe he had a terrible lapse in judgment.”
Uh huh. maybe. And maybe he’s one of those Didn’t Earn It types.