Posted on 03/31/2024 3:45:55 PM PDT by Signalman
Ford will need to build two fully electric F150s for every gas-powered F150. By 2032, the company will need to build four electric F150s for every gas-powered F150.
The Environmental Protection Agency has released its final tailpipe emissions standards, which some have called an electric vehicle mandate.
“Make no mistake: This is a coerced phase-out of gas-powered cars,” the Wall Steet Journal editorial board recently opined on the final rules.
The 1,181-page rule doesn’t require auto manufacturers to produce any electric vehicles, and the EPA insists the rule is not an EV mandate.
“The standards continue the technology-neutral and performance-based design of previous EPA standards for cars, pickups, and vans,” the agency states in a March 20 press release.
The rule sets limits on the total fleet emissions allowed from the companies’ vehicles, but the only way to meet the standards is for a manufacturer to, over time, appears be to make a large and growing portion of their vehicle lines electric.
With a mixture of hybrids, which combine aspects of batteries and gas-powered motors, the portion can be lowered, but automakers who continue producing gas-powered vehicles will likely need to produce a lot of EVs to meet the EPA’s demands.
Beginning in 2027, the average carbon-dioxide emissions allowed across truck fleets will be 184 grams per mile. By 2032, that will decrease to 90 grams per mile for trucks.
The Ford F150 is the best-selling vehicle in the U.S. today. The tailpipe emissions for its 2023 model line range from 352 grams per mile on the F150 Pickup 2WD HEV, to 741 grams per mile on the F150 Raptor R 4WD.
Matt Randolph, Sentinel Energy vice president and principal partner, explains in a Substack article that with an average of 430 grams per mile for the F150 line, in order to meet the 2027 EPA standards, Ford will need to build two fully electric F150s for every gas-powered F150. By 2032, the company will need to build four electric F150s for every gas-powered F150.
In 2023, Ford sold 750,789 gas-powered Ford F150s. For Ford to sell just half of the gas-powered F150s that it sold in 2023, Randolph writes, the company will need to produce 750,789 F150 Lightnings, the electric version of the truck, in 2027.
Ford had planned to produce 3,200 Lightnings per week, until this past December, when the U.S. automaker scaled that back to 1,600 per week. Should the company stick to that schedule in 2027, it will be permitted to sell only 166,400 of the popular gas-powered F150s.
By 2032, when the limits fall to just 90 grams per mile, the company will be able to sell only 41,600 conventional F150s, should it produce 166,400 Lightnings. In 2023, the company sold 24,000 Lightnings, but it had aimed to sell 150,000.
Energy expert Robert Bryce calculated, based on data from the company’s earnings report, that Ford lost $64,731 for every electric vehicle it sold. The company pulled off a $4.3 billion full-year net income last year only because its conventional vehicle sales produced so much profit that it made up for the losses on the company’s EV lines.
Should the EPA rule remain in place, the company will lose that revenue stream to support the losses on its EV lines.
It’s hard to say that the electric F150’s appeal to consumers will start to meet the company’s expectations anytime soon.
Compared to the hauling capability of its gas-powered counterpart, the vehicle falls woefully short, according to those who have driven the vehicle. Automotive writer Aaron Turpen wrote in a review of the Lightning that when towing full loads, the vehicle’s range will drop down to as little as 100 miles, less in cold weather.
Writing in MotorTrend, Christian Seabaugh recounted his experience hauling sand and rocks with a Lightning.
The gas-powered F150 versions have towing capacities ranging from 8,200 pounds to as much as 14,000 pounds.
Seabaugh was looking to haul about 4,800 pounds of gravel and sand for a patio-paving project at his home. With three trips, Seabaugh was able to haul all the sand and gravel back to his house, but he had to exceed the towing capacity on the vehicle by a couple hundred pounds.
Surveys show that most F150 owners do little to no hauling, so it’s hard to say how much that limitation will impact consumers buying personal vehicles. Companies looking for work vehicles for their fleets won’t likely be as comfortable with work crews having to make multiple trips in an electric truck that could be done with a single trip in a gas-powered truck.
For consumers, the main concerns about EVs are lack of charging stations, cost of repairs, and range anxiety, which is the fear of running out of charge before reaching a charging location.
The chances that Ford will sell enough Lightnings in 2027 that the EPA will grant the company permission to build enough of its popular gas-powered F150s to meet demand were further dimmed this past week.
The Detroit Free Press reported that Ford is cutting the hourly workforce at the plant in Dearborn, Michigan, where it produces the Lightnings. A year prior, the company had announced it was ramping up production, but as the pace of sales slowed, the Freep reports, the company has scaled back production.
In just three years, scaling back production of EVs will require automakers to do the same for their gas-powered lines.
Which clause in the Constitution gives Biden the authority to issue such a mandate?
Things that can’t be done, won’t be done. Especially, things that are impossible. The EV mandate is ridiculous. It’s no different than declaring men are women because they pretend to be. Don’t worry, this too shall pass.
U.S. Constitution
Article 1. The Congress shall construct a thermostat to control the temperature of planet earth.
Article 2. Every hour, the Congress shall adjust that thermostat.
Article 3. The Congress shall set the maximum level of the oceans.
Article 4. The Congress shall set the miles per Kilowatt.
Article 5. The Congress shall set the rotational speed of the planet earth.
Article 6. The Congress shall set the size of The Ozone Hole.
These ban oil and gas people are nuts....
They need to take a poll - will you be buying an EV in the next gazillion years?
Wow, that’s some Congress. 😆😆😆😆😆
These mandate maniacs should be driving EVs but they never will
Constitution? That’s the 230+ years old document whose ideas are old and outdated, right?
Doing so, they will destroy the American economy in much the same way the Bolsheviks destroyed the Russian economy in the 1920s and 1930s
I would not worry much about this.
When the crunch comes, it will be overturned with prejudice by the American people.
Not even the auto manufacturers take it seriously.
I think a better example is Canada. Everyone is having problems with the cost of living in Canada. That is what will happen to us if Biden wins reelection, we will suffer from the bad policies by the Democrats. We won’t starve but our standard of living will continue to decline.
Tomorrow Trudeau’s 23% carbon tax hits and watch the price of everything go up . The left really thinks if they tax tax tax things people have to use they’ll stop using them .
Since ICE vehicles need to be sold to make up for the losses on EVs (especially Ford), this would drive the auto manufacturers into bankruptcy very quickly.
Pushing electric everything while deliberately sabotaging the grid.
Next, will be the $10/gal tax on gasoline, so if you think you’re just going to keep driving that Silverado, think again.
And, these a$$clowns think DJT wants to be a dictator?
LMAO!
HOW DOES CONGRESS LET THIS CONTINUE?
The one Biden pulls out of his decrepit rear end.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.