Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Maine moves to join Democratic-led pact to elect president by popular vote instead of Electoral College
Washington Examiner ^ | April 3, 2024 | Misty Severi

Posted on 04/04/2024 12:46:48 PM PDT by grcuster

A new Maine bill was passed by the state legislature on Wednesday that would tie Maine’s Electoral College votes for president to the country’s popular vote.

The bill narrowly passed the state’s lower chamber in a 73-72 vote. It was then approved by the state Senate, and it now heads to the desk of Gov. Janet Mills (D-ME), who has not indicated whether she will sign the legislation. If she does, the state would join a national movement where each state in the agreement would assign their Electoral College votes to the candidate who wins the national popular vote.

“The Maine legislature’s approval of the NPV bill gets our country one step closer to a goal that already enjoys broad bipartisan support and simply makes sense: electing the president by popular vote,” former Michigan Republican Party Chairman Saul Anuzis told the Washington Examiner. “The National Popular Vote plan advances the principle of one-person, one-vote when electing the president. That’s good for every voter, the integrity of our elections, and the health of our democracy. Period.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Maine
KEYWORDS: 2024election; democrats; democratsedition; demonicrats; election; electioninterference; electoralcollege; illegal; lawless; maine; sedition; tds; unconstitutional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: grcuster

Folks, this is a canary in the coal mine.

Republicans need to get these laws repealed in the states that have passed them.

No one should have their presidential vote nullified just because Los Angeles county votes for the Democrat party.


21 posted on 04/04/2024 1:06:56 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grcuster

Stupid move, for sure.
Minimize even further the value of individual voters in your state. Yup, that’s a recipe for success...


22 posted on 04/04/2024 1:07:00 PM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. The Dhimmicraps are ALL Traitors. All of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grcuster

Mob rule, democracy in its pure form


23 posted on 04/04/2024 1:07:57 PM PDT by ducttape45 (Proverbs 14:34, "Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

“ It may drag the results out, though.”

Anyone not expecting this thing to go into March, a year from now, will be disappointed


24 posted on 04/04/2024 1:11:13 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

The 12th doesn’t change anything that would effect this. All it means is the electors vote for 1 guy for each office instead of 2. It doesn’t change anything about how electors are selected, which is basically at the state legislatures discretion. Could be votes of the people in the state, divided any way they want, could be direct appointment, could be the weather in Bogota. Or could be the results of the national popular vote. All the 12th changes is the instructions those electors are given, now WHY they get those instructions.


25 posted on 04/04/2024 1:11:43 PM PDT by discostu (like a dog being shown a card trick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: grcuster

Nasty pieces of excrement. I watched video where 2 dims who voted against it the first time were told to go take a walk outside when the second vote came up so it would pass.


26 posted on 04/04/2024 1:12:28 PM PDT by New Perspective (As Leonard Cohen said once in an interview, “You won’t like what comes after America”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grcuster

Ideology is more important than sovereignty or survival.


27 posted on 04/04/2024 1:12:46 PM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grcuster

Yawn. When one single state that voted for Trump in 2016/2020 passes this, let me know, meanwhile it’s just low-hanging fruit states, of which the movement for this Compact is rapidly running out of.


28 posted on 04/04/2024 1:13:39 PM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grcuster

The people of Maine have lost their power. This is unconstitutional, btw.


29 posted on 04/04/2024 1:13:47 PM PDT by Ge0ffrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dutch Boy

I’d prefer that we do it on a congressional district basis.

For example, Minnesota has eight congressional districts.

Even in bad GOP years, the Presidential candidate will win at least 2-3 districts.

One electoral vote for the winner of each district plus one vote for the overall winner in the state.

Instead of being swept every four years, the GOP Presidential candidate can actually walk away with something rather than nothing.

The same would happen in states like Virginia or Washington state.


30 posted on 04/04/2024 1:16:38 PM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: xp38

Besides, I think it will be VERY easy to manipulate that kind of vote.


31 posted on 04/04/2024 1:19:00 PM PDT by SMARTY ("A lie which is half a truth is ever the blackest of lies." Tennyson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stevio

Yeah, the pack lasts until a republican wins and then they’ll all go back to doing it the old way. I want to see a couple of these states go for the democrat and then by law have to assign their delegates to the GOP candidate because of the popular vote. How quickly can you say, “special session of the state legislature”?


32 posted on 04/04/2024 1:19:27 PM PDT by redangus ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grcuster

Maine moves to join Democratic-led pact to create election interference and collusion to win an election by any means possible...

There-—fixed the title.


33 posted on 04/04/2024 1:20:21 PM PDT by mikelets456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grcuster

Man, these people are stupid.


34 posted on 04/04/2024 1:21:01 PM PDT by Bullish (...And just like that, I was dropped from the ping-list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

NY-—FLA-—CALIF-—Ill—Tex would be doing all the electing.

47 states would not count for anything


35 posted on 04/04/2024 1:22:41 PM PDT by ridesthemiles (not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dutch Boy

Or congressional districts. Each district awards one electoral vote and the states popular vote determines the two senator votes. Put every congressional district and state in play. In that way democrats can’t just cater to the big cities.

Of course, none of that matters if the democrats get to count the votes until they win.


36 posted on 04/04/2024 1:23:37 PM PDT by redangus ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: grcuster

How can one state ignore their residents vote results to other states to decide for them.


37 posted on 04/04/2024 1:24:44 PM PDT by midwest_hiker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ge0ffrey

Once again, we have neoCON “Republican” traitors helping pass garbage like this so that NYC and Chicago and LA can stuff the ballot box full of millions of fraudulent votes and we all have to suffer.


38 posted on 04/04/2024 1:25:13 PM PDT by imabadboy99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

” I think it will be VERY easy to manipulate that kind of vote.”

I think that’s the point.


39 posted on 04/04/2024 1:25:20 PM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: grcuster

So Maine wants to be politically irrelevant and ignored by all future federal governments.


40 posted on 04/04/2024 1:25:30 PM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson