Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I dunno about Reagan. I think Bush 41 would have. I'm probably way off lol.

“I really do think we’re missing an opportunity, a historic opportunity here — if we had a president like my old boss in the White House,” he said. “Every time [when] I was mayor and I had to make a difficult decision, I would say, ‘What would Ronald Reagan do?’ I know what Ronald Reagan would do right now. He would have hit Iran before their first missile got to Israel. And he would have taken out every nuclear facility he could. He would have been trying to look for an opportunity to do that for years.”

1 posted on 04/13/2024 8:13:24 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ChicagoConservative27

Reagan? No. Bush 41. Yes. Bush 43. Yes (especially after 9/11 which happened 8 months after his inauguration).


2 posted on 04/13/2024 8:15:24 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I think Pres Reagan would have hit Iran first.

Protecting Israel would have been the 2nd thing he would be protecting in his mind.

The first would be America.

Hitting Iran first would be protecting America in the long run and Pres Reagan played that type of chess.


4 posted on 04/13/2024 8:17:07 PM PDT by Notthereyet (NotThereYet. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Reagan, of blessed memory, gave Iran weapons in exchange for US hostages. For that, he was almost impeached.

I have a memory.


6 posted on 04/13/2024 8:18:01 PM PDT by Trumpisourlastchance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Giuliani is probably wrong about this. Reagan bailed out of Lebanon the moment things went bad there for the U.S. there.


10 posted on 04/13/2024 8:19:41 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Yes he would have, Unfortunately we have a demented obama puppet in the White House. All you Biden voters,,,, are you happy now?! Effing idiots.


25 posted on 04/13/2024 8:34:39 PM PDT by Rummyfan (In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man.c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27
the Iranian Navy suffered significant losses. Six vessels were either sunk or damaged and two oil platforms were destroyed.

Operation Praying Mantis: All you need to know
28 posted on 04/13/2024 8:45:39 PM PDT by Kid Shelleen (Beat your plowshares into swords. Let the weak say I am strong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

And Trump shut them down during his four years.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jun/21/donald-trump-retaliatory-iran-airstrike-cancelled-10-minutes-before

There was a whole host of bombers and drones in the air, all visible on Iran’s radar, prepared to hit secondary targets if they did anything else. Iran totally backed down and did nothing for the rest of Trump’s term. He scared the dishdashah off of them.


32 posted on 04/14/2024 4:29:56 AM PDT by wbarmy (Trying to do better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LS

Am interested in your take on this. Thanks.


34 posted on 04/14/2024 5:21:05 AM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

For what reason, if any, did Iran attack Israel?


35 posted on 04/14/2024 5:23:33 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27

First, President Reagan would not have given Iran that kind of money.

His arms-for-hostages deals were cooked up by Poindexter and North, and constantly played on Reagan’s deep sympathy for the hostages. But he was buffaloed before North totally went rogue. Also, it was entirely done in the context of an Iran-Iraq war-—not a war against an ally. Basically he allowed the two tigers to fight.

Second, though, Reagan never reacted with force of arms unless:
a) urged to in an emergency by neighboring nations as in Grenada; b) as a peacekeeping force, which he admitted was an error (Lebanon); or c) without multiple, repeated specific warnings (Libya).

Third, for something such as this-—which might risk a major war-—Reagan’s Doctrine was to exhaust every other possibility; get FULL support of the American public; go in with overwhelming force; and to stipulate an exit strategy.

So I don’t think he’d act in this situation, but he wouldn’t have given the Mullahs this much money in the first place.


36 posted on 04/14/2024 9:13:19 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Let's look at the past as we saw it then, and not as we see the present today. Let's say Reagan would not have retaliated for the initial 10/7 attack and let Israel go it alone. For the cruise weapon attack six months later, Reagan would absolutely wreck the Iranian military.
37 posted on 04/14/2024 10:33:22 AM PDT by Widget Jr (9/11 - 11/M - 10/7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson