Posted on 04/15/2024 6:24:50 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
In Addition to being prohibited from attending my son Barron’s High School Graduation, I have just learned that the highly biased Judge in the Soros “appointed” D.A. Alvin Bragg’s Witch Hunt Case, will not allow me to attend the historic PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY argument in front of The United States Supreme Court, on Thursday, April 25th (next week!).
(Excerpt) Read more at truthsocial.com ...
Amazing.
I’ve lived in the north east NY media market for most of my life. It isn’t a secret.
Trump brought Marla Maples on a vacation with his family and tried to hide her. Maples confronted his wife and divorce followed. He married her because she was pregnant.
That’s just one.
Good for you.
And yet, presidents have immunity from executive decisions. Trump isn’t being charged for executive decisions. That is not what he is facing, nor does this lead to future presidents being charged.
You belong on du, not fr.
I believe Trump said a celebrity can even grab some one in the pussy and get away with it. That was reported by an NBC reporter. Not sure he ever said HE grab someone like that. I invite others to prove me wrong.
I did see the statement, 6 years ago.
She has addressed it. She signed it to try to remain in compliance with the nda.
She will testify.
Ok. Don’t know what that is, but they have an open bar?
Run along now, the DUmp is waiting for you.
Even further than the germaphobe/petri dish argument, the woman looks like trash. Trump could afford much nicer for much less if he had wanted.
Women like her would never lie, would they? There’s something off about her, something just a little less pretty than a normal looking gal. They make these stories up to make others believe how much rich and powerful men “want” them.
He’s a discusting agitator troll.
No , the client does not “need” to be there and in fact President Trumpmhas not been to previous oral arguments.
Here’s the transcript. Make of it what you will.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_Access_Hollywood_tape
And her testimony will be unequivocal BS. She’s literally a whore, testifying against a United States president. Like all of these “cases”, it’s made up out of whole cloth.
>> The petitioner is represented by council
Pray tell WHAT council represents Petitioner Trump, Oh Learned One?
The Student Council?
The local Boy Scout Council?
Or perchance did you mean “counsel”, you who are so wise in the ways of... well, apparently everything? Except maybe spelling and grammar?
Closer to a monkey. Don’t much care for makeup and I can pick up things with my toes on a good day.
The client has the right to be there.
Re: 64 - you could be correct about possible home confinement conditions; those would certainly subject to appeal.
The dive bar in the village? Thought that closed in the late 80s.
So you’re trying to tear down Trump. Then who do you hope wins the election? The effect of your recent post is to assist the Biden campaign.
Re: 115 - you need to point me to some case law that bears out your claim that an Appellant has a right to personally attend Supreme Court oral arguments.
If I had a Nicole for ever time I spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to women to not talk about lies…..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.