Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/17/2024 10:10:39 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Depending on the politics — $50 fine for the anti-Kavanaugh protestors and 20 years for the Trump supporters.

Hope SCOTUS introduces some sanity to this.


2 posted on 04/17/2024 10:16:02 AM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Free all Biden regime political prisoners.


3 posted on 04/17/2024 10:23:33 AM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Biden’s Solicitor General’s argument to the court seemed to serve a dual purpose:
<><>to placate the court’s concerns that the govt’s reading of Section 1512(c)(2) is overbroad
<><>and to convince the justices that the DOJ applies the statute uniformly.

Yet, judging by the questions and responses from the bench, a majority of the justices remained unconvinced.

Far from establishing that the Biden DOJ enforces Section 1512(c)(2) uniformly,
<><>his solicitor general’s argument painted a far different picture
<><>that the Biden admin acted solely in its own interests
<><>that it enlarged or contracted statutory language to serve its political purposes of the moment.


4 posted on 04/17/2024 10:26:54 AM PDT by Liz (This then is how we should pray: Our Father who art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Section 1512(d)(2) should be declared unconstitutional, as it is overly broad to the point that it interferes with First Amendment guarantees. A reasonable person would not know if their action is unlawful under this statute.


5 posted on 04/17/2024 10:43:51 AM PDT by Savage Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Is this is the guy that was doing the arguments about the law being misused in the case of the J6 defendants? If so then I can say that he did a terrible job. It was the justices themselves that brought up the good arguments.


6 posted on 04/17/2024 11:18:35 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Sotomayer and Kagan seemed to be thinking that Congress passed a law with the intent to be as broad as possible and to anything which caused annoyance in regards a legislative session, hearing, or task.


7 posted on 04/17/2024 11:37:59 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

It would be good, to have the Supreme Court rule in a way that frees most of the J6 Protesters.

It would also be good for the DOJ to get slapped down to size for lawfare.


9 posted on 04/17/2024 12:51:22 PM PDT by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

They noticed it was a scam


10 posted on 04/17/2024 12:58:29 PM PDT by NWFree (Sigma male 🤪)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson