Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FCC votes to restore net neutrality rules
The Hill ^ | 04/25/2024 | JULIA SHAPERO

Posted on 04/25/2024 9:38:02 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted Thursday to restore Obama-era net neutrality rules.

The agency voted 3-2 along partisan lines to revive rules barring broadband providers from blocking or throttling internet traffic to some websites and speeding up access to others that pay extra fees.

The move brings broadband under the purview of the FCC by classifying it as telecommunications service under Title II of the Communications Act.

“Four years ago, the pandemic changed life as we know it,” FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel said at Thursday’s commission meeting. “We were told to stay home, hunker down and live online. So much of work, school and healthcare migrated to the internet. If we wanted to engage with the world, we needed to do it all through a broadband connection.”

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1984; arrestrosenworcel; bigbrother; censorship; enemieslist; fcc; fccsedition; governmenttakeover; jessicarosenworcel; netneutrality; neutrality; restore; rules
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
FCC is garbage
1 posted on 04/25/2024 9:38:02 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

...which seems to open the door for FCC
regulation of CONTENT on the interwebsnet.


2 posted on 04/25/2024 9:49:18 AM PDT by William of Barsoom (In Omnia, Paratus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William of Barsoom

Always what this was about.


3 posted on 04/25/2024 9:50:16 AM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
The agency voted 3-2 along partisan lines to revive rules

About what I expect for "Neutrality" rules.

4 posted on 04/25/2024 9:50:54 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (It's not "Quiet Quitting" -- it's "Going Galt".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Wish they’d come here and see what’s up with our radio signals. Anyone else having issues. Seems daily here in Reno all stations AM/FM go offline. Sometimes just a few minutes, others seems like a half an hour. Solar flare issues? I still get the XM radio signal ad.


5 posted on 04/25/2024 9:53:46 AM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this💩? 🚫💉! 🇮🇱👍!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

About time. If I contract for unlimited service, it should be just that. And it is none of the supplier’s business what my content is, whether competitor or otherwise. That is net neutrality. Now, if the supplier wants to offer me a discounted service to filter my service, blocking competitors, let them offer it, I might consider it.


6 posted on 04/25/2024 9:59:13 AM PDT by Reno89519 (If Biden is mentally unfit to stand trial, he is mentally unfit to be president. He needs to resign.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

39 years old nobody lawyer when Obama brought her into government. And zero background in anything to do with radio, internet or TV.


7 posted on 04/25/2024 9:59:25 AM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Besides, without net neutrality, Internet service providers might block FreeRepublic. So, yes, we do need net neutrality.


8 posted on 04/25/2024 10:00:36 AM PDT by Reno89519 (If Biden is mentally unfit to stand trial, he is mentally unfit to be president. He needs to resign.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

Only Net Neutrality isn’t what you are going to get.


9 posted on 04/25/2024 10:01:44 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

“Besides, without net neutrality, Internet service providers might block FreeRepublic. So, yes, we do need net neutrality.”

Exactly.

Unfortunately a lot of people commenting on net neutrality don’t actually know what it is.


10 posted on 04/25/2024 10:03:01 AM PDT by JSM_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: dfwgator

I know the term is abused, but the generic concept is what is needed. As long as the content is legal, it should be untouchable by the Internet service provider.


12 posted on 04/25/2024 10:03:13 AM PDT by Reno89519 (If Biden is mentally unfit to stand trial, he is mentally unfit to be president. He needs to resign.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

As I recall the arguments from the last time, net neutrality was a big freebie for the large players like Netflix, who hog the bandwidth of the ISPs.


13 posted on 04/25/2024 10:06:02 AM PDT by Chad C. Mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chad C. Mulligan

Waiting for Karl Denninger to chime in.........


14 posted on 04/25/2024 10:08:13 AM PDT by Chad C. Mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Affordable Care Act, PATRIOT Act, Inflation reduction Act, No Child Left Behind, etc.... All modern policies and laws do the exact opposite of what they are termed or titled.

And now we have Net Neutrality. Which precisely means we will have Government Managed Internet, with censorship of Content.


15 posted on 04/25/2024 10:09:43 AM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Well the “disaster” of having it go away never took place. Honestly nothing changed. So I expect nothing to change again.


16 posted on 04/25/2024 10:09:53 AM PDT by discostu (like a dog being shown a card trick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
Affordable Care Act, PATRIOT Act, Inflation reduction Act, No Child Left Behind, etc.... All modern policies and laws do the exact opposite of what they are termed or titled.

Exactly.

17 posted on 04/25/2024 10:12:01 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

You are falling for the propaganda name of the policy.
That is why they name bills and policies the way they do.

Did your health insurance get cheap with the Affordable Care Act? Did the PATRIOT act protect us from islamic terrorists or did it target American citizens on behalf of DC?


18 posted on 04/25/2024 10:12:49 AM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
There is a defect in the net neutrality concept. It insists on equality of outcome without acknowledging the cost to achieve a high performance network node. It is DEI for networking. Worse, it ignores that network transmission facilities, switches, bridges, firewalls and servers are privately owned hardware with a broad range of performance characteristics. There is no "equality" of performance. You get performance in proportion to what you spend for hardware, software and competent engineers to configure and operate it.

At a more pedestrian level, the FCC thinks it is OK to limit billable service pricing regardless of how much the end user consumes. There is a huge difference in data transfer quantity between an e-mail/browser end user, a perpetual video watcher and a party running large servers pulling website data scrapes to train an AI model. The needs for speed and volume vary for each case and should be priced by the burden imposed on the network services provider. FCC argues they should all pay the same. The only way that works out is much higher prices for everyone as the pricing must cover the costs for the most burdensome services OR providers exit the business because they can't remain profitable.

19 posted on 04/25/2024 10:13:38 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Most modern radio stations are computer driven audio switches running off network audio feeds. Everything is precisely timed. Any failure of a network stream or the switch software takes the station offline. Solar flares can be a cause. So can DDOS attacks that swamp all of the network bandwidth.
20 posted on 04/25/2024 10:16:08 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson