Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Raskin: Supreme Court should be moved ‘over to the RNC headquarters’
The Hill ^ | 04/26/2024 | FILIP TIMOTIJA

Posted on 04/26/2024 11:00:09 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) said the U.S. Supreme Court should be moved to the Republican National Committee (RNC) headquarters, after some conservative justices suggested being open to arguments in favor of presidential immunity from prosecution for former President Trump.

“They’re politicians who are not even subject to popular election, unlike me,” Raskin said during his Thursday appearance on MSNBC’s “The ReidOut.” “They should move the Supreme Court over to the RNC headquarters because they’re acting like a bunch of partisan operatives.”

Raskin’s assessment comes as D. John Sauer, the attorney representing Trump in Thursday’s arguments regarding the former president’s immunity, suggested his client could hypothetically could order a military to eliminate his political rival and still be covered by presidential immunity.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: ag; ags; basketcase; crybaby; demmoron; demonicrat; headquarters; jamieraskin; jerkmeratskin; raskin; ratskin; rnc; scotus; sidebarabuse; sumpremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: Gay State Conservative

I’d like to take a bat and whirlwind his head


41 posted on 04/26/2024 11:50:29 AM PDT by Fledermaus (Is it me, or all of a sudden have the buried trolls come out on FR like cicadas? It's all noise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sasquatch
Okie Dokie

Okey Donkey

42 posted on 04/26/2024 11:50:45 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Goes to show you just how outta touch woke libs are!


43 posted on 04/26/2024 11:50:56 AM PDT by bantam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

DOJ is at DNC headquarters.


44 posted on 04/26/2024 11:52:02 AM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mware
DOJ is at DNC headquarters.

DOJ is in Biden's pocket and Garland is up his putooty.

45 posted on 04/26/2024 11:52:59 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I noticed he stopped playing the “cancer card” with that blue bandana of his …. (Or was he dressing as a crip and got called out for cultural appropriation by AOC? )


46 posted on 04/26/2024 11:53:39 AM PDT by Free Louie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

To a Democrat, anyone who believes in the rule of law is the enemy.


47 posted on 04/26/2024 11:53:53 AM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

If Biden had another SOTU address he could let Ratskin write it.


48 posted on 04/26/2024 11:54:34 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pookie18

I’m wondering if the J6 committee members could be held legally liable for misrepresenting the truth in their reports.

Reports are not supposed to be for debating; they’re supposed to be for reporting findings. Leaving out stuff like Trump authorizing 10,000 National Guardsmen for J6 is misrepresentation - IOW, lying by ommission.

Holding Nancy Pelosi off-limits in the investigation could be considered obstruction of justice.

Etc.


49 posted on 04/26/2024 11:55:17 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Where was this idiot during Ruth Bader Ginsberg’s unholy reign of terror. How soon they forget. Roe v. Wade was the biggest DNC giveaway of all time by a SCOTUS.


50 posted on 04/26/2024 11:55:44 AM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (America -- July 4, 1776 to November 3, 2020 -- R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Ratskin can go take a long walk off a short pier.


51 posted on 04/26/2024 11:56:44 AM PDT by sauropod (Ne supra crepidam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

My exact thoughts.


52 posted on 04/26/2024 11:57:09 AM PDT by sauropod (Ne supra crepidam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

The DOJ is arguing that a President should have immunity if his/her AG tells him/her that an action is legal.

Alito asked why wouldn’t a POTUS just choose an AG who would allow them to do anything.

This is all a backhanded way of trying to make anything Garland says OK for Biden to do.


53 posted on 04/26/2024 11:57:44 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
The DOJ is arguing that a President should have immunity if his/her AG tells him/her that an action is legal. Alito asked why wouldn’t a POTUS just choose an AG who would allow them to do anything.

Heard that, the lawyer said that the Senate confirmation process would police that, yep, sure.

54 posted on 04/26/2024 11:58:46 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Come on cancer! Finish the job!


55 posted on 04/26/2024 11:59:02 AM PDT by DarthVader (Not by speeches & majority decisions will the great issues of the day be decided but by Blood & Iron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Soooo nice to hear Rat-Skin squeal.


56 posted on 04/26/2024 12:14:09 PM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Freedom is never free. It must be won rewon and jealously guarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

I can’t believe that anybody would be willing to confirm somebody if they knew that person was going to have legal license to approve ANYTHING he wanted the POTUS to do.

If this is how it would be, there would never be another US Attorney General.

In order to hold the POTUS accountable they argue to have an untouchable AG. Unbelievable. And it would be an untouchable AG because that AG could have the POTUS order the Deep State to literally murder anybody who tried to prosecute the AG.

Also, the Senate that they claim can’t be trusted to do the impeachment trial necessary to hold a POTUS accountable for crimes.... is supposed to be trusted to keep a lawless AG from being confirmed? If the legislative branch is supposed to hold the executive accountable then what’s their gripe against the Constitutional means to hold a President accountable - namely through impeachment?


57 posted on 04/26/2024 12:16:57 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Would that help offset the DOJ over at the DNC?


58 posted on 04/26/2024 12:29:26 PM PDT by NWFree (Sigma male 🤪)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Democrats have to win all the time or something unconstitutional has to be done to save democracy.


59 posted on 04/26/2024 12:32:06 PM PDT by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Justice Jackson said at the hearings on immunity:
“the Oval Office Could Turn Into a Seat of Criminality”...


Golly, who knew she was that alert.....keeping track of Biden’s activities.


60 posted on 04/26/2024 12:37:28 PM PDT by Liz (This then is how we should pray: Our Father who art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson