Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN’s Honig: Cross Examination of Stormy Daniels Was ‘Disastrous’
Breitbart ^ | 05/08/2024 | Pam Key

Posted on 05/08/2024 6:22:41 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

CNN senior legal analyst Elie Honig said Tuesday on “The Source” that during the New York business record case, adult film star Stormy Daniels’ cross-examination by former President Donald Trump’s lawyers was “disastrous.”

Honig said, “It’s hard for me to believe that a juror heard that and thought, this is entirely made up. There may well be some embellishments…but I think it’s quite clear they had sex in 2006 in that hotel room. But the cross-exam, boy, her responses were disastrous. I mean, ‘Do you hate Donald Trump?’ Yes. Of course, she does. That’s a big deal. When the witness hates the person whose liberty is at stake, that’s a big damn deal. And she’s putting out tweets, fantasizing about him being in jail. That really undermines the credibility.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: crossexamination; daniels; disastrous; honig; juanmarchan; stormydaniels; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last
To: AnotherUnixGeek

So was she lying all the times she said they didn’t have sex or is she lying now?

There is a whistleblower that says the whole thing was a scam she did with Cohen to get money out of Trump.


41 posted on 05/08/2024 7:07:10 AM PDT by tired&retired (Blessings )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SomeCallMeTim

Trump is a well known Germophobe, does not even like shaking hands. I can’t believe he would put little Don anywhere near a walking bug factory like “Stormy”


42 posted on 05/08/2024 7:09:52 AM PDT by ABN 505 (Right is right if nobody is right, and wrong is wrong if everybody is wrong. ~Archbishop Fulton John)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
She did a bit on Jimmy Kimmel's late show...and her true colors came through loud and clear. She's a whore looking for money. She owes Trump something like $600,000.

The case has NOTHING to do with sex...it's that he didn't list $130,000 blackmail paid to whore...

43 posted on 05/08/2024 7:10:12 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm
My understanding is two members of the jury are attorneys. They have to know how over the top this case had become. Of course politics can enter their decision but hard to imagine one ruling Trump as guilty when they still have not established the actual crime.

Turley also thinks there is a chance of direct verdict.

44 posted on 05/08/2024 7:13:02 AM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
Part was done yesterday. To continue on Thursday.

What can the jury be thinking...no way can they see her as anything but a whore looking to blackmail Trump.

And by the way...the world knows he wears boxers and silk pajamas. He even sells Trump Pajamas.

45 posted on 05/08/2024 7:13:22 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm
Marchan knows this case cannot withstand appeal if there is a conviction.

True, and his legacy will be sealed in history as the judge who purposefully and willfully allowed a corrupted case to go forward with the single intent of HIS to obstruct and interfere with a Presidential election - really a p*ss poor legacy even for an activist judge.

46 posted on 05/08/2024 7:15:14 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: high info voter

Imagine if Trump walked into court with a suit covered in knee pads with Willie Brown written on them. Everyday he could wear a message. It would leave a mark.


47 posted on 05/08/2024 7:16:16 AM PDT by cnsmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

I will tell you something else. Trump has his own line of cologne. He would not have Old Spice in his bathroom cabinet.


48 posted on 05/08/2024 7:17:52 AM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm

“this case cannot withstand appeal if there is a conviction.”

Of course it can. The same way it became a case in the first place. We absolutely cannot assume that an appeal will be cleaner or more fair that what’s going on now.


49 posted on 05/08/2024 7:19:03 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Navarro didn't kill himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired

“a scam she did with Cohen to get money out of Trump”

Supposedly, the true affair was between Daniels and Cohen, and they cooked up this money-grubbing con on Trump together, with Cohen as the instigator.


50 posted on 05/08/2024 7:21:29 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Navarro didn't kill himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mware

Yeh....Old Spice makes no sense...We all would have known it. I’ll go do some googling....though I agree with you.


51 posted on 05/08/2024 7:24:52 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

https://www.amazon.com/Stainless-Manicure-Pedicure-Grooming-Beauty/dp/B085JPD9GP


52 posted on 05/08/2024 7:29:01 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Bet this is where the Gold Manicure set came from....lol


53 posted on 05/08/2024 7:29:56 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

Daniels and Avenetti...I think..


54 posted on 05/08/2024 7:30:54 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

But wait. What about the people here who claim he is a germaphobe and would never touch a woman like her?


55 posted on 05/08/2024 7:33:53 AM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

https://www.perfume.com/donald-trump


56 posted on 05/08/2024 7:37:20 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

The above came out in 2004...so timely for 2006...


57 posted on 05/08/2024 7:37:49 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: MNnice

You actually expect Harvey Weinstein and Donald Trump to both receive equitable treatment in the NY courts? That part of the law got on the train and left town a long time ago.


58 posted on 05/08/2024 7:41:45 AM PDT by Locomotive Breath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
All the stories on Trump's trial written by LIBERAL LEFTISTS seem to convey a DESPERATE effort to impart guilt and show "ineffectiveness".

Trump is under "God's Hedge of Protection" and WILL, in the end, PREVAIL!

59 posted on 05/08/2024 7:45:48 AM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: high info voter
Prostitutes perform a service discreetly, WHORES rob the John afterwards.

Proper categorization is important.

60 posted on 05/08/2024 7:45:54 AM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (The yoke of government must be kept light if Freedom is to Prevail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson