Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pat Buchanan is finished at MSNBC
MSNBC | 3/11/03 | Interious

Posted on 03/11/2003 11:59:38 AM PST by Interious

Talking about the Jim Moran imbroglio regarding Jewish influence vis a vis the war, Pat Buchanan sticks his foot in mouth once again by refering to the Jewish lobby as the "Amen Corner".

I like Pat, he is a patriot with a good soul. But is this not stupid? Egad.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: amencorner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: Interious
My big problem with Buchanan is that he had no problem staying on that loser Nixon's team
He was right there in China with Nixon and Kissinger helping drag China out of the backwaters into the main world

All that after ranting about the evils of communism for years
41 posted on 03/11/2003 1:55:55 PM PST by uncbob ( building tomorrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Vast Right Wing
"Patriot with a good soul? I think he is an anti-semetic bigot, how does that make him a patriot?"

Well, the question I ask in these instances is: Would I trust him/her to raise my children. In the case of Pat, I would. In the case of Clinton, for example, I would not.

That assumes that he would not indoctrinate my progeny with his endless difficulty with Jews and Israel. Perhaps a tall order. I hope not.

42 posted on 03/11/2003 2:10:46 PM PST by Interious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Pat Buchanan's on MSNBC?

Yea he and Bill Press have a sort of crossfire show..pretty good..

43 posted on 03/11/2003 2:14:52 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Bill Press??? Man, I'd have to be in jail to watch Buchanan and Press. Yikes.
44 posted on 03/11/2003 2:26:14 PM PST by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Beats Greta Van liberal face
45 posted on 03/11/2003 2:31:37 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Interious
Hitler was a "patriotic" German, but a moron. Pat is not a Patriot. His ideas would end this country. He is a big mouth fool who is full of himself. He has no place in the conservative movement. He is a better fit for the Dems.
46 posted on 03/11/2003 7:41:16 PM PST by Broward Lion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Interious
Pat like Arianna seeks and basks the light of publicity. They feed off it. He is just another wannabe spotlight hunter who is an embarrassment to himself.

Pat belongs in the Europe of the left wing anti semitic trash not America.

47 posted on 03/11/2003 8:55:34 PM PST by eleni121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
My definition of "patriot" is NOT someone who tells us we should have minded our own business during World War II.

Pat said this? When?

48 posted on 03/12/2003 4:53:07 AM PST by Cacophonous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: holdonnow
Pat has John Sweeney's domestic agenda, George McGovern's foreign policy agenda, and Huey Long's delivery.

I guess we should be glad Pat doesn't have Elton John's domestic agenda, George Michael's foreign policy, and Huey Lewis' delivery.

Seriously though, is McGovern like the New Patron Saint of the Dem Party right now, or what? Talk about self-mutilation...

49 posted on 03/12/2003 5:02:42 AM PST by ez (Advise and Consent = Debate and VOTE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Cacophonous
It was one of the central messages in his book A Republic Not An Empire.
50 posted on 03/12/2003 5:34:01 AM PST by Illbay (Don't believe every tagline you read - including this one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
I've read A Republic Not an Empire, and I remember he wrote that WWII was avoidable, but that once we were attacked, we had no choice but to enter the war. I don't remember his saying we should have minded our own business. Could you tell me where he said this?

I know he talked about the foolishness of the war guarantees Britain made to Poland, which had the effect (his theory) of turning German attention to the Brits instead of the Soviet Union. He opined that it would have been better to let the Communists and Nazis beat each other up, and let GB better prepare itself to clean up the remnants of whichever dictator was left. It may also have had the effect of avoiding the pounding London and the rest of England took.

I don't necessarily agree with that view, but I don't think that it implies any sort of support for Germany or Hitler, as many on here claim (hopefully you are above that).

51 posted on 03/12/2003 8:44:22 AM PST by Cacophonous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson