Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

One Democratic Debate, Nine Losers,(One Cowardly Gen).
NRO ^ | October 10, 2003, 8:38 a.m. | Byron York

Posted on 10/10/2003 6:34:14 AM PDT by .cnI redruM

You can say this about Richard Gephardt: He sticks to his ideas, even when they make absolutely no sense.

Gephardt's unerring consistency was on full display at the presidential debate Thursday night when a woman named Joy Clayton, the owner of a small business called Bobby C's Lounge and Grille, rose to ask the candidates what they would do to help ease the burden that government places on her business.

"I found that there were so many taxes associated with going into business," Clayton said. "There were taxes upon taxes. There's a privilege tax that you're levied just for the privilege of doing business. What would you do to try to help those of use who are trying to be in small business accomplish it without so much of the pain?"

Debate moderator Judy Woodruff turned to Gephardt. You've advocated repealing the entire Bush tax cut, she said. Wouldn't that be a tax increase for people like Joy Clayton?

Perhaps Gephardt didn't hear the question. Or perhaps he just didn't understand it. In any event, after telling Clayton that "small businesses like yours are having to pay a lot of tax," Gephardt said the solution to her problem would be to...repeal the Bush tax cut.

Gephardt explained to Clayton that even though she was struggling under high taxes, by raising her taxes even further, he would be able to fund universal, single-payer health care, which would save her the money she spent providing health care for her employees.

The problem was, almost anybody watching could guess that Bobby C's Lounge and Grille, like many small businesses, probably didn't have a full-scale employee health-care plan. Even John Kerry could figure that one out.

"I'm not sure that's even applicable here," Kerry said, jumping in to the exchange. "Do you even have health care for your employees?" Clayton nodded her head no, meaning that the answer Gephardt had just given her was resoundingly irrelevant to her actual situation. Sensing that he had scored a takedown, Kerry went on to tell Clayton that he would not raise her taxes.

The moment was Gephardt's worst of the debate. It came toward the end, when the candidates have removed their coats, rolled up their sleeves and got down to the business of answering questions from the audience. Before that, in the more formal, wear-your-coat-and-stand-behind-the-podium portion of the debate, the candidates devoted less time to misunderstanding the needs of small businesses and more time to attacking Wesley Clark.

Howard Dean got things started when he reminded the audience that last year Clark had advised a congressional candidate, Katrina Swett, to support the resolution for war in Iraq.

A short time later, Joseph Lieberman picked up where Dean left off. "I must say that I've been very disappointed since Wes Clark came into this race about the various positions he has taken on the war against Saddam Hussein," Lieberman said. "Howard Dean is right...When [Clark] became a candidate he said he probably would have voted for the [Iraqi war] resolution. There was an uproar. Then he said: I never would have voted for the resolution....We need a candidate who will meet the test of reaching a conclusion and having the courage to stick with it."

Clark tried to defend himself. He really, really opposed going into Iraq, he said. "I would never have voted for war," Clark said. "The war was an unnecessary war. It was an elective war, and it's been a huge strategic mistake for this country."

Then Clark sent what any candidate would recognize as a distress signal. "I'm not going to attack a fellow Democrat," he declared in a voice that said, Please stop attacking me.

If Clark really thought that would work, he was seriously mistaken. "I disagree with General Clark that this is an attack when Joe Lieberman raises an issue," Kerry said, piling on. "The fact is that last year General Clark did say he would vote for the resolution that was in the Congress. In addition to that, at the time in May when he said that the right people were in charge, referring to Bush and to Cheney and Rumsfeld."

Beaten back, Clark tried to present his bona fides. "Let me be very clear on this: I did not vote for George W. Bush. I voted for Al Gore." Then, in what seemed like an admission, he confessed that he had indeed once said something positive about Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld: "Like every other American, I wanted the national security team to be successful."

But nothing Clark said could buy him peace. The audience laughed when a clearly delighted Lieberman said to him, "The first thing I want to say, Wes Clark, welcome to the Democratic presidential campaign." Then Lieberman made clear: "Look, none of us are above questioning."

Things took a momentarily surreal turn when Dennis Kucinich stopped attacking Clark and instead attacked Dean for being an hawk on Iraq. The former Vermont governor had said that even though he opposed the war, the U.S. could not simply withdraw its troops. Kucinich — who sometimes chants "U.N. in, U.S. out" — supports an immediate retreat.

"Would you fund keeping the troops in Iraq?" Kucinich asked Dean.

"Yes," Dean said.

"You would?" Kucinich said, a little incredulously.

"If the president was willing to pay for it..."

"I would say bring our troops home, Governor," Kucinich said.

"You can't do that," Dean answered.

After that brief dustup, everyone got back to whacking Clark.

There was no winner in Thursday night's debate, which was the most contentious of the four debates held so far. Gephardt embarrassed himself, Clark was a punching bag, and Kerry stumbled through. Even Al Sharpton didn't get in his normal quotient of crowd-pleasing lines. Dean, as he has at previous debates, did not dazzle but also did not make any serious mistakes.

When it was over, CNN, the network that sponsored and aired the debate, cut away quickly, with only minimal commentary, to resume its coverage of the Kobe Bryant case. By that time, many of its viewers had no doubt already left.


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; barracksemporer; democratdebate; dems; losers
I'm thinking we can put a fork the turkey formerly known as Barracks Emporer Wastely Clark. I haven't seen that poorly executed a retreat since the Iraquis fled Kuwait City for Basra back in 1991.

I'm frightened to say this, but judging from the snippets presented here, John Kerry actually made MORE sense than the other jet fuel geniouses gathered in Phoenix to insult the collective intelligence of the electorate.

York is correct. These people are moronic lamesters!!!

1 posted on 10/10/2003 6:34:14 AM PDT by .cnI redruM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Donate to Free Republic, and Save Larry The Lobster!!!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

2 posted on 10/10/2003 6:37:12 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Thanks to Byron York for watching and reporting on this stuff. I can't stand it. I will not watch any Demo. candidate events until after the Super Bowl.
3 posted on 10/10/2003 6:40:49 AM PDT by G L Tirebiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
"Like every other American, I wanted the national security team to be successful." ... Wesley Clark

Wesley baby, there were 9 "Americans" on the stage with you who did not want the security team to be successful. That's counting Judy Woodruff, of course.

4 posted on 10/10/2003 6:47:39 AM PDT by Aegedius (Money can buy happiness. Money can buy love. Money can't buy class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
I watched the debate last night. I found it very interesting. Some dems did say some things that I personally agreed with. But, just when I got my hopes up, typical leftist crap would come out of their mouths. If they don't wish to win, they should keep on bashing Bush.

I think the moderator did a decent job at keeping the Bush bashing to a min.
5 posted on 10/10/2003 6:50:53 AM PDT by mmandahl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
I'm frightened to say this, but judging from the snippets presented here, John Kerry actually made MORE sense than the other jet fuel geniouses

LOL! I wouldn't be TOO frightened to say that...it's not exactly high praise!

6 posted on 10/10/2003 6:53:08 AM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmandahl
I agree. Several did pretty good, actually. Kerry is getting much, much better. Dean held his own, and Clark is self-destructing. I think it will be a slugfest between Dean and Kerry and Edwards will be the VP candidate. He's coming up strong on the outside. Kucinich,Braun and Sharpton ought to just get out. They are taking up space on the stage.
7 posted on 10/10/2003 7:03:26 AM PDT by RichardW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: G L Tirebiter
Thanks to Byron York for watching and reporting on this stuff. I can't stand it. I will not watch any Demo. candidate events until after the Super Bowl.

I tried to watch for a few minutes last night. I had to bail when Gephardt gave klinton credit for the economic bliss of the 90's, then said "if you want to live like a Republican, vote for a democrat". Such stupidity and delusion gathered in one place is truly something to behold, provided that one is immune from nausea.......

8 posted on 10/10/2003 7:07:04 AM PDT by awelliott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Y'all don't understand. Ahsley's sposed to be the punching bag. That's the way rapistx42 and The Hildabeaste want it.

They've got all the dwarves arguing among themselves.

Just when it looks hopeless, The Hildabeaste will come charging in on her white horse wearing her white hat (and won't that be a nice compliment to black CRUSTY? :) and save the day for all of us.

And don't you feel sorry for the horse? Let's hope she doesn't ride bareback :)

9 posted on 10/10/2003 7:10:29 AM PDT by upchuck (Wanna make the Taglinus FreeRepublicus list? Simple-just jiggle jigsaw with yer credit card number :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G L Tirebiter
I had the debate on when my two year old came into the study and popped a Teletubbies cassette into the machine. I watched TT for five minutes before I realized what he had done.
10 posted on 10/10/2003 7:15:09 AM PDT by wtc911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mmandahl
I could only watch snippets of the debate, while trying to watch the Red Sox play those Damn Yankees. The Nine Losers were so in the attack mode, I thought they were all turning on Judy Woodruff at one point. This was a good article.
11 posted on 10/10/2003 7:23:21 AM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
I had the debate on when my two year old came into the study and popped a Teletubbies cassette into the machine. I watched TT for five minutes before I realized what he had done.

I'd have probably wondered why everything suddenly started to make sense...
12 posted on 10/10/2003 7:30:25 AM PDT by G L Tirebiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
By that time, many of its viewers had no doubt already left.

There is no "s" on viewer.

13 posted on 10/10/2003 8:14:51 AM PDT by 1Old Pro (ESPN now has 4 little wimpy sissies left. I'm switching back to FOX.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776
The Nine Losers were so in the attack mode

Are you referring to the Red Sox or the Dems because the BoSox weren't in any attack mode as far as I could tell.

14 posted on 10/10/2003 8:16:54 AM PDT by 1Old Pro (ESPN now has 4 little wimpy sissies left. I'm switching back to FOX.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
At least the moderator stayed awake...
15 posted on 10/10/2003 8:17:20 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (Zot me and my screen name gets even dorkier!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
At least the moderator stayed awake...

If you lived with Al Hunt you wouldn't clse your eyes either, he's a slimey rodent.

16 posted on 10/10/2003 8:19:11 AM PDT by 1Old Pro (ESPN now has 4 little wimpy sissies left. I'm switching back to FOX.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Did I understand the prescription drug woman at the Democrat debate mention in passing that she was on the Pfizer drug assistance program which cut her costs from $484 to $51/month? Then the Democrat candidates took off on the drug companies as the cause for high drug costs with her nodding in total agreement? Did I hear it right?
17 posted on 10/10/2003 8:26:59 AM PDT by Rushian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rushian
You did. The Welfare State is a monopoly, just like OPEC. If Pfizer can deliver social assistance more efficiently and less expensively than the US Government, then that monopoly comes under fire from superior competition.

The exchange you mentioned, IMHO, was one of the best philosophical moments in the entire affair. If Pfizer really can look after indigent patients better than Washington, DC, than even voters who have a generally positive opinion of Howard Dean, would come to believe he serves the country better as a doctor in Vermont than as a spoilsman in DC.
18 posted on 10/10/2003 8:37:19 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (Zot me and my screen name gets even dorkier!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
sniff...referring to the democrats attacking each other and lashing out at Judy Woodruff
19 posted on 10/10/2003 4:48:10 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
I saw the debate where that lady asked the question referred to at the beginning of the article. It was silly (even Kerry pointed that out) when Gephardt said the key to easing the tax burden on business owners was to reverse the Bush tax cuts. these guys just dont get it.
20 posted on 10/12/2003 8:29:53 AM PDT by anncoulteriscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson