Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking trust with the children (Gov. Davis of CA steals special-ed funds from local schools)
San Diego Union Tribune ^ | March 27, 2002 | Marsha Sutton

Posted on 03/29/2002 11:07:41 AM PST by John Jorsett

California educators were finally rewarded for their lobbying efforts when the federal government sent $135 million to the state to reimburse school districts for money they've been forced to spend on federally mandated special education programs.

Educators were thrilled, but the celebration was brief. Upon receiving the money, Gov. Gray Davis chose not to pass it through to the school districts but rather decided to apply the funds to help ease the state's budget shortfall.

By usurping the money, some say Davis betrayed the education community, stole from the children of California, and broke faith with those who have trusted and supported him all these years.

This disappointing decision is particularly disheartening, because this governor has done so much in the past to champion California's public education system.

Over the years, educators have been pressuring national leaders to fund special education programs, which Congress began mandating in the 1970s. At the time, Congress promised to pay 40 percent of the costs.

Yet since then, the most the federal government has paid for these mandatory services has been 15 percent, forcing school districts to dip into their general funds for the difference. This has meant less money for regular education for all K-12 students and for daily instructional resources like textbooks, library books, supplies, equipment, field trips, and teacher aides.

Finally this year, Congress authorized an increase to states for special education programs, and California's share came to $135 million – still a fraction of actual costs but a significant chunk of change by anyone's standards. But educators were left to wring their hands in frustration, as they saw the money vanish under the governor's rearranged budget priorities.

Children with learning disabilities or other special needs have the unquestionable right to equal opportunity in education. No one would disagree with this.

However, the cost of providing these programs, many of which are extremely expensive, greatly exceeds the funding that state and federal governments give. And the programs, more and more each year, are mandated. Districts can be sued for not providing appropriate educational services for children with special needs.

Transportation for special education students is one of the services mandated by the state. In Del Mar, for example, the annual cost of transporting 28 special education students to and from school is $225,000, according to the superintendent. This comes to a staggering $8,035 per child per year.

The San Diego County Office of Education said that, this year, $615 million is being spent on special education programs and services for the 42 school districts in the county. The federal government pays back $34.6 million, and $275 million comes from state and local sources. This leaves an encroachment of $309 million that San Diego school districts must absorb.

School districts provide special education services willingly and feel they are worthwhile, but they'd like some help paying the bills. Although that $135 million was to be distributed to districts throughout the state, San Diego County's portion, however small, would surely have been welcomed by local school districts.

With this disreputable act, the long tradition of ignoring students with disabilities and taking their educational needs for granted continues. And when districts have to pay huge sums of money from their own general funds to support these costly, mandated programs, there's considerably less money for all the other students who do without. So their needs too are being disregarded.

By diverting federal money earmarked specifically for special education, Davis has committed a grave injustice to the education world, and he has broken an unwritten promise with the children of this state who count on him to be fair and honorable.

Return the money to the schools, governor, and restore faith.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: calgov2002
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Oh yeah, we want four more years of this. Vote Simon.
1 posted on 03/29/2002 11:07:41 AM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
"Return the money to the schools, governor, and restore faith."

Return the damn money to the PEOPLE it was stolen from, yes the California working class/taxpayers, and leave us the hell alone!

2 posted on 03/29/2002 11:11:50 AM PST by tinacart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Is this LEGAL? I thought money sent by the feds had to be used for the purpose for which it was intended.

Attention Bill Simon: DAVIS STEALING FROM CHILDREN!! Get those ads up pronto!!

3 posted on 03/29/2002 11:12:38 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
By usurping the money, some say Davis betrayed the education community, stole from the children of California, and broke faith with those who have trusted and supported him all these years.

Just another mean spirited dem stealing from the children.

I'm sure Reuters,AP,CNN, will be all over this story.(not)

4 posted on 03/29/2002 11:12:49 AM PST by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
By diverting federal money earmarked specifically for special education, Davis has committed a grave injustice to the education world, and he has broken an unwritten promise with the children of this state who count on him to be fair and honorable.

He may also have violated the law. For any entity to use Federally appropriated funds in a manner inconsistent with the stated purpose is a violation of appropriations law.

5 posted on 03/29/2002 11:19:54 AM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
How's this different from what Gov. Davis accused the power companies of last summer?
6 posted on 03/29/2002 11:19:56 AM PST by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
I'd be curious to know if this is being reported in the LAT and San Francisco Chronicle. This sounds like the end of Davis. . .
7 posted on 03/29/2002 11:22:32 AM PST by Alissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
if this is federal money for a specific program,is illegal to take it for something else!
8 posted on 03/29/2002 11:27:33 AM PST by green team 1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
GoD Bless America and Help US free our children from the grasps of these mindless nabobs in public office like GraYouT DeViou$

We should expect better then this from our elected officials..
See Bill.. See Bill Run.. Go Bill Go !!! Fight Bill Fight!! WIN BILL WIN... !!!!






SEMPER FI
Norm
9 posted on 03/29/2002 11:29:36 AM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Looks like Grayout Davis is screwing up. I love it!
10 posted on 03/29/2002 11:30:59 AM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Looks like Grayout Davis is screwing up. I love it!

Didn't he do that already with that nasty interview he gave to the San Diego Union-Tribune recently?

11 posted on 03/29/2002 11:36:44 AM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Its fun watching Dimocrat Davis and the even more dim legislature figure out how to balance the budget. Except in the end you know that they will increase taxes.
12 posted on 03/29/2002 11:54:53 AM PST by Baytoh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest at the Beach; calgov2002
pingaroonie and index action...
13 posted on 03/29/2002 11:56:44 AM PST by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eureka!
It's my money and I'll do what I want
14 posted on 03/29/2002 12:21:31 PM PST by tbird-james
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
OK, I'm confused. Should I be happier that Davis kept the money

Or that he turned it over to the whores in the Teacher's Union?

Reducing budget shortfall ( and optimistically, future taxes); Mayber he's actually done the right thing?

15 posted on 03/29/2002 12:36:50 PM PST by IMHO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IMHO
The money was to reimburse the local school districts for the funds they expended in meeting federal mandates. Having Davis divert it is essentially taking it from the local taxpayers to spend it on something else. That amounts to a tax increase on the local taxpayers, and also means they won't be able to spend it on their priorities as opposed to Gray's. It may have been squandered anyway, but at least there'd have been a chance that the local school board could have been influenced. As it is, the money is out of their control.
16 posted on 03/29/2002 12:44:50 PM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
In most school districts, special ed serves around 15% of the students, and uses more than 20% of the budget. And that doesn't include the cost of the regular ed services that special ed kids need. This program is so terribly overmandated and underfunded that even giving the schools all these new fed payments hardly covers what they'll pay out in the next year. Dump Davis.
17 posted on 03/29/2002 1:18:54 PM PST by UserFPC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: UserFPC
This program is so terribly overmandated and underfunded that even giving the schools all these new fed payments hardly covers what they'll pay out in the next year.

Yep. The article says the the $135 million doesn't come close to covering the expenses to date.

18 posted on 03/29/2002 1:53:06 PM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tbird-james
Re #14 Yep. Grayout is King. Or so he thinks. It seems this week though--with this and California crime up, Simon has some good ad material. GoSimonGo...
19 posted on 03/29/2002 3:16:52 PM PST by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: UserFPC
Why the heck do we need so much for special education?

If I were spending the money, I'd spend nothing on students who can't learn, and pour my resources into those who can.

I don't understand this obsession with pouring money down the rathole of the weak, the stupid and the handicapped.

I remember seeing a course catalogue that included a three-part course on "The Exceptional Child". I thought it was going to be neat stuff for the brilliant, but it went something like this: Part I addressed disrupters. Part II addressed the retarded. Part III addressed the physically handicapped. If there was time, the gifted might get a few scraps.

What kind of pathetic society are we going to have in the future, if we give all our attention to those who don't deserve any?

D

20 posted on 03/30/2002 6:46:17 AM PST by daviddennis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson