Skip to comments.
Breaking trust with the children (Gov. Davis of CA steals special-ed funds from local schools)
San Diego Union Tribune ^
| March 27, 2002
| Marsha Sutton
Posted on 03/29/2002 11:07:41 AM PST by John Jorsett
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Oh yeah, we want four more years of this. Vote Simon.
To: John Jorsett
"Return the money to the schools, governor, and restore faith."
Return the damn money to the PEOPLE it was stolen from, yes the California working class/taxpayers, and leave us the hell alone!
2
posted on
03/29/2002 11:11:50 AM PST
by
tinacart
To: John Jorsett
Is this LEGAL? I thought money sent by the feds had to be used for the purpose for which it was intended.
Attention Bill Simon: DAVIS STEALING FROM CHILDREN!! Get those ads up pronto!!
To: John Jorsett
By usurping the money, some say Davis betrayed the education community, stole from the children of California, and broke faith with those who have trusted and supported him all these years.Just another mean spirited dem stealing from the children.
I'm sure Reuters,AP,CNN, will be all over this story.(not)
4
posted on
03/29/2002 11:12:49 AM PST
by
mdittmar
To: John Jorsett
By diverting federal money earmarked specifically for special education, Davis has committed a grave injustice to the education world, and he has broken an unwritten promise with the children of this state who count on him to be fair and honorable. He may also have violated the law. For any entity to use Federally appropriated funds in a manner inconsistent with the stated purpose is a violation of appropriations law.
To: John Jorsett
How's this different from what Gov. Davis accused the power companies of last summer?
6
posted on
03/29/2002 11:19:56 AM PST
by
Lockbox
To: John Jorsett
I'd be curious to know if this is being reported in the LAT and San Francisco Chronicle. This sounds like the end of Davis. . .
7
posted on
03/29/2002 11:22:32 AM PST
by
Alissa
To: John Jorsett
if this is federal money for a specific program,is illegal to take it for something else!
To: John Jorsett
GoD Bless America and Help US free our children from the grasps of these mindless nabobs in public office like GraYouT DeViou$
We should expect better then this from our elected officials..
See Bill.. See Bill Run.. Go Bill Go !!! Fight Bill Fight!! WIN BILL WIN... !!!!
SEMPER FINorm
To: Miss Marple
Looks like Grayout Davis is screwing up. I love it!
10
posted on
03/29/2002 11:30:59 AM PST
by
hchutch
To: hchutch
Looks like Grayout Davis is screwing up. I love it! Didn't he do that already with that nasty interview he gave to the San Diego Union-Tribune recently?
To: John Jorsett
Its fun watching Dimocrat Davis and the even more dim legislature figure out how to balance the budget. Except in the end you know that they will increase taxes.
12
posted on
03/29/2002 11:54:53 AM PST
by
Baytoh
To: Ernest at the Beach; calgov2002
pingaroonie and index action...
13
posted on
03/29/2002 11:56:44 AM PST
by
eureka!
To: eureka!
It's my money and I'll do what I want
To: John Jorsett
OK, I'm confused. Should I be happier that Davis kept the money
Or that he turned it over to the whores in the Teacher's Union?
Reducing budget shortfall ( and optimistically, future taxes); Mayber he's actually done the right thing?
15
posted on
03/29/2002 12:36:50 PM PST
by
IMHO
To: IMHO
The money was to reimburse the local school districts for the funds they expended in meeting federal mandates. Having Davis divert it is essentially taking it from the local taxpayers to spend it on something else. That amounts to a tax increase on the local taxpayers, and also means they won't be able to spend it on their priorities as opposed to Gray's. It may have been squandered anyway, but at least there'd have been a chance that the local school board could have been influenced. As it is, the money is out of their control.
To: John Jorsett
In most school districts, special ed serves around 15% of the students, and uses more than 20% of the budget. And that doesn't include the cost of the regular ed services that special ed kids need. This program is so terribly overmandated and underfunded that even giving the schools all these new fed payments hardly covers what they'll pay out in the next year. Dump Davis.
17
posted on
03/29/2002 1:18:54 PM PST
by
UserFPC
To: UserFPC
This program is so terribly overmandated and underfunded that even giving the schools all these new fed payments hardly covers what they'll pay out in the next year. Yep. The article says the the $135 million doesn't come close to covering the expenses to date.
To: tbird-james
Re #14 Yep. Grayout is King. Or so he thinks. It seems this week though--with this and California crime up, Simon has some good ad material. GoSimonGo...
19
posted on
03/29/2002 3:16:52 PM PST
by
eureka!
To: UserFPC
Why the heck do we need so much for special education?
If I were spending the money, I'd spend nothing on students who can't learn, and pour my resources into those who can.
I don't understand this obsession with pouring money down the rathole of the weak, the stupid and the handicapped.
I remember seeing a course catalogue that included a three-part course on "The Exceptional Child". I thought it was going to be neat stuff for the brilliant, but it went something like this: Part I addressed disrupters. Part II addressed the retarded. Part III addressed the physically handicapped. If there was time, the gifted might get a few scraps.
What kind of pathetic society are we going to have in the future, if we give all our attention to those who don't deserve any?
D
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson