Posted on 04/02/2002 4:03:08 PM PST by veronica
What is Israel trying to accomplish in its latest incursion into the West Bank and Gaza?
At first sight, it seems merely a resumption of the bailing operation that was interrupted in deference to the third "peace process" mission of retired Marine Gen. Anthony Zinni. The Israeli ship is filling with water, in the form of constant suicide bombings destroying public morale, the sense of security, and even the national economy. The scheme is to eliminate terrorists faster than they can come at you -- to bail the water faster than it is entering the ship. It is one way to remain afloat, and not to be despised when there is no alternative.
A closer look reveals larger, but still limited, ambitions. "Operation Root Treatment," the last round of incursions, aimed at clearing terrorist operations, including bomb and rocket factories, out of sanctuaries in the Palestinian refugee camps. It is succeeded by an operation that has gone straight to Ramallah, and whose purpose is almost certainly to wreck the whole infrastructure of Yasser Arafat's Palestinian Authority. That the whole of the PA is now a terrorist front, no less than, say, Hezbollah, almost goes without saying. (It runs schools and hospitals, but then, so does Hezbollah.)
Consider, for instance, the list of weapons the IDF were able to confiscate from Mr. Arafat's "civil government" compound when they took most of it over. These included not only dozens of Kalashnikov rifles and "micros" and other assault rifles, but Berettas and Norwegian sniper weapons.
There were extensive stores of bombs, mortars and their launchers, fragmentation and smoke grenades, crates of machine-gun and pistol magazines, commando knives, telescopic sights, night-vision devices, bulletproof and combat vests.
About 500 Palestinian men were arrested in and around Mr. Arafat's compound, dozens of whom were on Israel's lists of wanted terrorists.
European "peace activists" were used as a front by the Palestinians in a clever operation to smuggle several of the most-wanted terrorists who had retreated to Mr. Arafat's office. They surprised the Israelis on their way in, but on their way out IDF soldiers surrounded them and detached and grabbed their suspects. These may have included the murderers of the Israeli tourism minister, Rehavam Zeevi.
Under the Madrid/Oslo "peace process," Mr. Arafat agreed, in return for being allowed to return to the West Bank and Gaza, to limit armaments in Palestinian-administered territories to sidearms and standard equipment required by police. He undertook not only to prevent violent attacks on Israel and Israelis, but to adopt a pacific tone, and of course disavow terrorism.
The pretense that he has done anything other than fuel and incite violence, since the moment he arrived, is no longer sustainable. Explosives of the very kind used by Palestinian suicide bombers have been found in Palestinian Administration police caches all over the territories. And Mr. Arafat's constant rhetorical celebration of the cult of "martyrdom" and other forms of homicide is now a matter of public record. His game is up.
Most significant is the intelligence haul from Mr. Arafat's compound. The IDF soldiers have been at pains to secure and remove files, documents, and communications records; the mission to Ramallah was in some sense planned like the commando raid on the Karine A in the Red Sea in January. There is presently a large traffic of intelligence "content" between the Israeli government and the CIA, Pentagon, U.S. State Department and White House in Washington. Connections between the Palestinian Authority and international Islamist terror organizations, including al-Qaeda, are being established, chapter and verse.
It is this intelligence haul that will keep the operation going. It is, in effect, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's repayment to President George W. Bush for understanding as Israel proceeds with -- judging from the reported call-up of some 31,000 reserves -- its largest single military operation since the invasion of Lebanon in 1982.
On this scale, it must be assumed that the IDF will go through the entire West Bank and Gaza, rounding up suspects, weapons and documents in the most thorough clean-out of terrorist nests yet attempted.
The Israeli air force has not been used this time in the Palestinian territories, but there have been more than a dozen bombing and strafing runs against Hezbollah positions in southern Lebanon in response to an increase in mortar attacks across Israel's northern frontier (timed to coincide with the escalation of suicide bombings). These still amount to warning shots, but if trouble persists in Israel's north, I would expect the airstrikes on Lebanese positions, and potentially even on Syrian ones, to expand dramatically.
The flipside of Mr. Sharon's understanding with Mr. Bush is a time constraint.
The Israelis must work quickly and try to conclude their operation in May -- for the U.S. should be in a position to strike against Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq by early June, and won't need the complication.
I believe the U.S. and Israel are presently negotiating with Morocco for a place to send Yasser Arafat (other than to hell). The Bush administration has -- after Vice-President Dick Cheney was effectively spat in the face by Mr. Arafat upon offering to meet him in Cairo -- finally written Mr. Arafat off. The problem now is what to do with him that will cause the least excitement in the Arab world, and what kind of self-administration can be established by the Palestinians once he is gone.
Will the Israeli operation succeed?
The short answer is no. The new mission title, "Operation Defensive Wall," is a misnomer. There is no indication the Sharon government is yet seriously considering the kind of Berlin Wall that would have to be erected between Israelis and Palestinians to put a permanent stop to suicide bombers. The reality is the two societies, though separated neighbourhood from neighbourhood, co-exist and mix in everyday life on either side of the Green Line (Israel's borders before the Six Day War in 1967). Some 1.2 million Arab Muslims live on the Israeli side of this line, and 400,000 Israeli Jews on the other.
And the bombing in Haifa on Sunday helped display the scale of the problem. Haifa, the seat of Israeli pacifism, was the one city where Jews and Arabs had, until recently, co-existed in peace. This ended months ago with a bus bombing. Sunday's bomber was an Arab Israeli citizen; the restaurant, named Matza, was likewise owned by an Israeli Arab; the clientele were mostly Jewish. It was part of a campaign within the campaign of suicide bombings: the Palestinian militias doing everything in their power to recruit Israeli Arabs, and to strike in ways that will polarize the two communities. The intention is to force Israel to turn against its native Arab population, in the hope of further radicalizing that community and, ultimately, creating a fresh refugee crisis.
The hard truth is that a real "defensive wall" would not begin to work before a Balkan-style exchange of populations. Any Jewish settlements outside the "defensive wall" would have to be withdrawn, and Israel would have to begin evicting the "fifth column" that has been forming within. The economic ramifications are equally huge to both sides. For the Palestinians, it would mean almost total unemployment and the loss of most of the existing food supply. For the Israelis it would mean a major retrenchment and economic transformation.
Before anything on that scale is contemplated, the Israelis will wait and see what comes of the U.S. mission to Iraq. Like the Gulf War of 1991, this will change the situation on the ground throughout the region. Meanwhile, they continue bailing, but with a bigger bucket.
I totally agree with this BTW. This is what Rush Limbaugh says and has been saying every day now.
Bollocks. Bush knows he can't count on the Arabs. Bush is figuring on four countries: Israel, Turkey, the U.K., and ourselves. That's all he needs. We are NOT about the business of rebuilding the Coalition.
But he deosn't get it. They don't give a crap about the Palestinians, in fact most of those countries killed Palestinains or drove them out of their own countries.
Of course he does. His going on about a "Palestinian State" is so much agitprop. After Iraq is conquered, the political conditions on the ground will change.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
When did Cheney make that offer?
Thanks for the compliment of asking my opinion. Really, I don't know, but I suspect that there's little connection between Israel's current war with the Palestinian Authority and America's apparently coming war with Iraq. It is true that Israel is under U.S. pressure to not push for victory too hard until after our Iraq D-Day. On the other hand, pressure on Israel from overseas democracies to act weakly is always present. Plus, there's always pressure from Egypt (and maybe Jordan) that if Israel goes too far, they'll break their peace treaties. It's also important that Israel not offend Turkey, its crucial Moslem ally. Then there's the constant pressure of the big Israeli left. You did know a lot of Jews are liberals, didn't you :-)
All these factors mean that there never is a good time for Israel to make preemptive strikes. Out of office right wing politicians, like Netanyahu, claim that if only they were in office, things would be different. Not really true. It is always tough for a democracy to mobilize properly for war. The U.S. is a little different in that we put up with a bit less than most other democracies. This is why we are, despite the one terrible day of terrorist success last September, are safer than most.
Oh please let this be true! If so, maybe arafart can star in the new movie "Running from Miss Daisy Cutter." :-D
I just don't understand why President Bush said that arafart is not a terrorist. I tried calling the White House all day, but the switchboard was constantly busy. Hopefully lots of people were as pissed off as I am.
About time.
Its not about that, its because I'm not playing a stupid game of political manipulation. And he is.
Bush says that Arafat is a force for peace
Is that right? Do you agree with Bush that a guy who has 400 wanted men in his compound, grenades, the same bombs suicide bombers use, rifles, mortars, who is connected to the arms shipment from Iran, is a force for peace.
Well, he's not. Fact. I don't need to be the head of the frigging CIA to know that.
But if you want to be a blind sheep who says: "my party, my president, right or wrong" you go right ahead. But I won't because that's not conservatism, that's what liberals do. Shame on you, open your eyes fool.
The solution first to every problem is to tell the truth. Any person who can read the above article would know that Arafat is not a "force for peace". Yet Bush told us that just yesterday. He told us that even though he knew it wasn't true.
Furthermore I don't need Colin Powell around to know that Islam is not a "religion of peace" but our president also tells us it is.
Bush is certainly better than any democrat, but I still resent being lied to myabe you people don't mind Clintonian behavior as long as the guy doing it has an (R) by his name, but I do!
if you sheeple want to say "my president right or wrong" no matter what nonsense he says you go right ahead, but we intelligent people know when we are being lied to, and we don't like it. Wake up moron.
To: sinkspur
>>lewrockwell.com is a Western Al-Qaeda outpost.
LRC is one of the true voices of sanity on the web.
15 posted on 3/21/02 7:32 PM Pacific by ak47fred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
He can get those countries behind him without lying about what Arafat is. There's no need for it.
Of course he does. His going on about a "Palestinian State" is so much agitprop. After Iraq is conquered, the political conditions on the ground will change.
Its not about that. Its about lying. And saying that Arafat is force for peace is a lie that hurts good people (the Israelis that Arafat helped murder and their families) for no good purpose.
Granted Bush is better than any democrat, but his conduct in this matter is terribly disappointing.
Not to split hairs, here, but I believe that all that Bush has said is that Arafat has negotiated in the past, so we can deal with him. We have not absolved him of responsibility for the present slaughter, nor have we indicated that we will negotiate with him directly in future.
Bush isn't lying. He just doesn't want to give the game away.
Be Seeing You,
Chris
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.