Skip to comments.
White Officer Wins Job Bias Suit.....Wins Reverse Discrimination Suit
ABC NEWS ^
| April 18 2002
| AP
Posted on 04/18/2002 5:44:00 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: *Reverse Racism
index bump
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
His lawyer, Gregory Smith, said Wood just wanted "to be vindicated in his belief that he was a victim of reverse discrimination." You'd think his lawyer would have gotten it right and just called it "discrimination".
3
posted on
04/18/2002 5:46:57 PM PDT
by
randog
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Folks claim the end of the world is nigh because a red heifer was born in Israel, but that story ain't got nothin' on this.
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
He added, "I thought it was unfortunate that we didn't have a more diverse jury." There was only one black juror. Note to self: L.A. Times is still full of self-hatred for their sorry white selves.
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Nelson Atkins, one of the attorneys who represented the city of Inglewood, said there was a lot of testimony from disgruntled city employees that may have influenced the jury. This is true, there area lot of victims of Reverse discrimination out there who are disgruntled
He added, "I thought it was unfortunate that we didn't have a more diverse jury." There was only one black juror.
Yes, it would be more fair if there had been a jury full of NAACP members. They would have been much more unbiased.
6
posted on
04/18/2002 6:04:37 PM PDT
by
Pontiac
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
White Officer Wins Job Bias Suit.....Wins Reverse Discrimination Suit This is a case of discrimination, there's no "reverse" about it.
Isn't it ironic how the very people who decry racism the loudest tend to be the worst offenders? State-sponsored racism dictates that it's okay if you do it against a white guy.
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Nelson Atkins, one of the attorneys who represented the city of Inglewood, said there was a lot of testimony from disgruntled city employees that may have influenced the jury. "Disgruntled city employees." I guess that's one term for the other people who are also victims of government-sponsored racism.
To: All
9
posted on
04/18/2002 6:27:27 PM PDT
by
Bob J
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
"Disgruntled city employees." I guess that's one term for the other people who are also victims of government-sponsored racism. No. It is a euphamism for white honkies.
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
i meant euphemism. i think.
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Oh my, the monster has killed Dr. Frankenstein.
I dentity politics is the death of this nation, so naturally it makes me happy when I see the rules reversed and applied uniformly.
12
posted on
04/18/2002 6:46:33 PM PDT
by
Jhoffa_
To: Jhoffa_
Oh yeah. The degree of success is in direct relation to how loud Jesse Jackass and Al Sharpton (or some wack liberal action committee) will scream about this "injustice".
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Still not close to the one FORD lost after which some black woman from personnel said, "I didn't think white men had civil rights". At least they got rid of diversity Naser.
14
posted on
04/18/2002 7:14:19 PM PDT
by
Righty1
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
And they will scream, for sure.
Because these rules were NEVER supposed to be enforced uniformly.
They were intended to be heavy burdens on other peoples backs, not their own.
15
posted on
04/18/2002 7:15:47 PM PDT
by
Jhoffa_
To: Righty1
...some black woman from personnel said, "I didn't think white men had civil rights". I believe it. These people are fed a steady diet of lies from the time that they are little kids. They have the victimhood mentality banged into their heads from day one. They're like the Palestinians. There are "minority" people in Hollywood who are damn near billionaires (like Bill Cosby) who insist that all minorities everywhere are subject to racism from everybody everywhere that isn't of their race. If they don't get a job or are passed over for promotion, it's automatically a racist conspiracy. And all too often, misguided sympathetic juries agree with them.
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
He added, "I thought it was unfortunate that we didn't have a more diverse jury." There was only one black juror. How true. Didn't OJ Simpson teach us that blacks will always rule in favor of blacks regardless of the evidence in the case.
Can you imagine the reverse, if in a discrimination suit against blacks one of the attorneys lamented that there werent more whites on the jury. The media would have a heart attack.
17
posted on
04/18/2002 7:32:47 PM PDT
by
Godel
To: Godel
He added, "I thought it was unfortunate that we didn't have a more diverse jury." If you read "diverse" as "liberal", you get the true meaning.
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
In other news, Satan, Lord of the Underworld, made the dramatic first time ever decision to light his kerosene heater. "It's damn cold today." he is quoted as saying. Various demonic sources were unavailable for comment concerning the recent freezing over of hell.
To: Senator Pardek
Whoa, haven't seen you around for awhile.
If you've been gone, welcome back.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson