Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stripper Mom: I'm Following The Bible
WorldNetDaily ^ | May 17, 2002

Posted on 05/17/2002 3:36:51 AM PDT by L.N. Smithee

Friday, May 17, 2002



Stripper mom: I'm following the Bible
Mother says high-paying job gives her time to teach daughter values


Posted: May 17, 2002
1:00 a.m. Eastern


© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com

The mother of a 5-year-old California girl facing expulsion from the Christian school she attends acknowledges her job as a stripper is not one to be proud of, but says her work allows her time to follow the Bible by being a "hands-on" parent.

As WorldNetDaily reported yesterday, the mother, Christina Silvas, was called into a conference at Capital Christian School in Sacramento after school officials became aware that she works as a part-time strip-tease dancer at a local club.

Rick Cole, senior pastor of Capital Christian Church, which sponsors the school, and other staff members met with Silvas to discuss their contention that her occupation is in violation of an agreement with and commitment to the school philosophy that parents must sign before the children are admitted as students. Her daughter would have to be removed, she was told, if Silvas did not quit her job.

The officials offered to cover the girl's last month's tuition of $400 if Silvas would change jobs. They also offered to support Silvas both financially and spiritually, and to help her find a different job that was in keeping with the school's values. Silvas declined the offer.

As a requirement for admission, parents of prospective students must sign a "commitment" to support the philosophy of the school. That philosophy, in part, reads: "Emphasis is placed on learning about God and the truths of God's Word in relationship to man and his world; recognizing that the way to God comes through personal faith in Jesus Christ; and Christian maturity comes by application of the truths of the Bible in all areas of life." In signing the document, parents agree to maintain a "partnership" with the school "regarding the standards and criteria of a Christian learning structure that involves the entire family."

According to reporter George Franco of KOVR-TV, Silvas has retained legal counsel and is considering filing a motion for an immediate injunction to have the child remain in school while the mother continues to work as a stripper.

Last night, Cole and Silvas discussed the matter with Bill O'Reilly, host of "The O'Reilly Factor" on Fox News Channel.

"We have appealed to her to change her occupation," Cole told O'Reilly, adding that "God would bless" such a decision.

While Silvas said she agrees with the school's philosophy, she sidestepped the question of whether she considered her occupation a "sinful lifestyle."

"I am just doing it for a season," Silvas reasoned, adding, "I'm not proud of what I'm doing."

Silvas argued that since her job takes her away for only three days a week – the days her daughter, Abby, is with her father – she is therefore available to be "the one to teach [Abby] the Bible at home," thus upholding her commitment to partner with the school in her daughter's education.

"The Bible calls on parents to be hands-on," Silvas told O'Reilly. She sees her situation as better than that of a single mother who puts her child in daycare for several hours a day.

When asked if it was fair that the school's actions were, in effect, punishing the daughter, Cole put the responsibility for the expulsion on the mother.

"My concern is, who is the cause of this consequence?" he asked. "The consequence of [Silvas'] choice is affecting her daughter adversely."

None of the participants in the televised segment talked about the possibility of litigation. Silvas did mention, however, that she hoped to find a new job soon and that people outside Capital Christian Church had offered to help her find work.

Previous story:

Kindergartener's stripper-mom in church-school flap


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: christinesilvas; medianonsense; privateschool; strippermom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-460 next last
To: AppyPappy
Who is accusing this mother of being a prostitute?

Every strip joint that I have seen has very strict rules. You touch the women, you are OUT OF THERE!

Actually, when I travel around the world and end up in some unusual cities, a stripper bar is the safest place for me to be. They always have a huge bouncer to insure that the women are protected.

21 posted on 05/17/2002 4:49:47 AM PDT by Hunble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
How about her natural talents as a prostitute or drug dealer? Would you deny her a living?

How is that different than an athalete using his or her natural talents to make a living? A football player or a boxer? Both are known to be terribly dangerous sports.

Mark

22 posted on 05/17/2002 4:50:49 AM PDT by MarkL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
What gives you the right to judge this woman? Why does no one ask where is dear ol' dad in this situation?
23 posted on 05/17/2002 4:53:17 AM PDT by MJM59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MJM59
I'm not judging her. I'm judging what she does.
24 posted on 05/17/2002 4:54:05 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Hunble
Sorry, but place my vote in the "Good Mother" side.

Oh, you mean the "Good Mother Who Wants Her Daughter Taught To Do The Right Thing But Does The Wrong Thing And Justifies It By Saying I Was Doing The Wrong Thing So You Could Learn To Do The Right Thing" side?

25 posted on 05/17/2002 4:54:18 AM PDT by L.N. Smithee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MarkL
Sports is not inherently immoral. Prostitution and drug dealing are.
26 posted on 05/17/2002 4:54:36 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Hunble
Let's see. Exchanging money for sexual favors. Yep, sounds like prostitution.
27 posted on 05/17/2002 4:55:07 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: notyourregularhandle
Prostitution is not illegal everywhere. Some forms are legal everywhere.
28 posted on 05/17/2002 4:55:45 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MJM59
Why does no one ask where is dear ol' dad in this situation?

It's a good question. But she's not targeting her daughter's father. She's going after the school.

Why do you think that is?

29 posted on 05/17/2002 4:55:49 AM PDT by L.N. Smithee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Let's see. Exchanging money for sexual favors. Yep, sounds like prostitution.

What, like a woman that gets married? You know, she gets her husband's income, a house, a car, etc....

30 posted on 05/17/2002 4:57:45 AM PDT by Hunble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Yeh, so they expel the child three weeks before the end of the term. Beautiful example of Christian mercy and forbearance. A rational person would have not wanted to loose the chance to influence the mom. This is just some tight asses indulging themselves. Real Christians would have jumped on this oportunity like a dog on a bone.
31 posted on 05/17/2002 4:58:13 AM PDT by Rifleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Rifleman
The child has been allowed to stay. You would think the mother would forgoe stripping long enough to let the child graduate but I guess her priority was stripping over her child.
32 posted on 05/17/2002 4:59:26 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
You probably are unusual if you read all the fine print of every contract you sign. While reading contracts is a great idea and I commend you for it, a lot of contracts are "adhesion contracts." If you want what the other party will provide, you must sign the contract whether you like it or not. I would sign the contract if I wanted what the other party will provide.
33 posted on 05/17/2002 5:02:18 AM PDT by TheCPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
I suppose that your life has been without even the least suggestion of impropriety. Frankly, I feel that the idea of men putting down a woman for exotic dancing is the ultimate pot calling the kettle black. It is an industry that caters exclusively to men. Many of whom are claiming to be as self righteous as you portray yourself.

And as long as what she is doing is not hurting anyone, you still have no right to judge, I believe that is left up to God. But thanks for calling.

34 posted on 05/17/2002 5:02:23 AM PDT by MJM59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
The child should not be punished for the actions of her mother. The contract is subject to interpretation. When the child is with her mother, the mother is not working and is spending time with her child.
35 posted on 05/17/2002 5:03:56 AM PDT by TheCPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hunble
Drugs are not the subject

hence the "what if" sceanrio I preceded it with.

I was just wondering if your position was that a "good mother" will do whatever she had to do to keep a child out of daycare, spend more time with the child, etc., yet at the same time do "whatever" to make enough money to be able to do all that. Stripping is what this mom chose....maybe another "good mom" would see the benefits of dealing drugs which would bring in tons of $$$ and provide her with the means to stay home with the child.

36 posted on 05/17/2002 5:04:55 AM PDT by ZinGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Hunble
I have absolutly no problem when a woman uses her natural tallents to make a profit.

That isn't the issue. The question is, what if other people do have a problem?

She can make all the profit she likes, and if she can find some school that -- mistakenly -- thinks that stripping is compliant with Christian values, she can enroll her kid in that school. Capital Christian Center is NOT one of those.

37 posted on 05/17/2002 5:05:09 AM PDT by L.N. Smithee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TheCPA
The mother should not punish the child with her behavior. The mother can find another school but the child cannot find another mother.
38 posted on 05/17/2002 5:06:25 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
Sorry guys I got to break with you guys on this one. And no I don't believe that being a stripper is ok. Shouldn't the church be trying to get closer inside an area of influence where they can help her, to show her why what she is doing is wrong? By kicking the kid out of the school, the church is basicly giving up the only area of influence that they have over the sinner. Looks to me that this women has some good things going for her already:

1. She believes in God

2. She believes that following the bible is good

3 She desires to have her kid brought up with those same values

As a Christian who desires to help people, sounds like a good base to work from if you ask me.
39 posted on 05/17/2002 5:07:01 AM PDT by Honcho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hunble
What, like a woman that gets married? You know, she gets her husband's income, a house, a car, etc....

If that's what being married means to you, I hope you aren't.

40 posted on 05/17/2002 5:07:04 AM PDT by L.N. Smithee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-460 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson