Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse
Tycobb

Posted on 06/09/2002 4:43:49 AM PDT by Tycobb

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: elfman2
See,that is where people make the mistake. For example; people say that there have always been wars and rumors of wars. The difference now is the Israel is in her land and Jerusalem (other than Temple Mount) is under her control. The Four Horsemen, and the prophetic clock, could not ride until that all happened. Anything (Wars or other prophetic happenings) before 1967 didn't matter, i.e. We have not had a World War since, for that matter, even 1948.
41 posted on 06/09/2002 12:50:48 PM PDT by Tycobb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell
The AC doesn't destroy Israel to get control of the land. His whole intent is to destroy all the Jews and destroy all the Christians. Jesus, as far as the Christians are concerned, said that, "And except those days should be shortened (Rapture), there shall be no flesh (Christians) be saved; but for the elect sake (Christians) those days shall be shortened." (Matt. 24:22)
42 posted on 06/09/2002 12:56:55 PM PDT by Tycobb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
You may not have been to church in years but you sure remembered the most important message. AMEN!
43 posted on 06/09/2002 1:00:53 PM PDT by elephantlips
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cousair
I kind-of had that report in mind when I posted this thread. I mentioned in that thread that, in my opinion, the White Horse may already be riding. If what Arafat is saying comes to happen, I wonder if that would be the start of the Red Horsemen riding. "....And there went out another horse that was red: and power was given to him that sat thereon to take peace from the earth, and that they should kill one another: and there was given unto him a great sword" (Rev.6:4).
44 posted on 06/09/2002 1:13:33 PM PDT by Tycobb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Tycobb
And I am not suggesting that Arafat is the AC.
45 posted on 06/09/2002 1:18:19 PM PDT by Tycobb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: PokeyJoe
"God (Heavenly Father) doesn't want us to fail"
If he does, we might as well hang it up.
"and will provide help when needed "
If He won't, nothing will.
"- but that there are some who will eat the apple because they want to eat the apple."
I definitely know what you mean. It's hard to imagine that anyone would knowingly turn away from God...but...it's naive to think otherwise, isn't it? To think, "I never could," is hubris.

Thanks, Joe. Your ideas are very good ones.

46 posted on 06/09/2002 1:51:53 PM PDT by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell
That's true, it has changed hands an excessive amount of times. Your post just made Daniel's gold-headed beast more clear. :^)
47 posted on 06/09/2002 8:47:30 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
I don't agree, 3.

I'm not a pastor, just a discusser. So the wise would check it out for themselves and draw their own conclusion. :^)

48 posted on 06/09/2002 8:52:38 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Tycobb
Jesus, as far as the Christians are concerned, said that, "And except those days should be shortened (Rapture), there shall be no flesh (Christians) be saved; but for the elect sake (Christians) those days shall be shortened." (Matt. 24:22)

There doesn't seem to be a "(Rapture)" or a "(Christians)" in my concordance. Did you plug those in yourself?

49 posted on 06/09/2002 9:10:45 PM PDT by William Terrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Tycobb; Jeremiah Jr; 2sheep; crystalk; Dallas; dighton; dennisw; sheik yerbouty; Light Speed
Compare the colors of the horses - white, red, black, green (pale = "chloros") - to:

Pan-Arab Colours

Arab Revolt Flag, Arab Liberation Flag

 

Origin of the Pan-Arab Colours

From the PASSIA home page:

Red
The Khawarij were the first Islamic group to emerge after the assassination of Caliph Uthman III, forming the first republican party in the early days of Islam. Their symbol was the red flag. Arab tribes who participated in the conquest of North Africa and Andalusia carried the red flag, which became the symbol of the Islamic rulers of Andalusia (756-1355).
In modern times, red symbolizes the Ashrafs [ie. Sharifians] of the Hijaz and the Hashemites, descendants of the Prophet.
Green: The Fatimid Dynasty (909-1171), North Africa
The Fatimid Dynasty was founded in Morocco by Abdullah Al-Mahdi, and went on rule all of North Africa. They took green as their color, to symbolize their allegiance to Ali, the Prophet's cousin, who was once wrapped in a green coverlet in place of the Prophet in order to thwart an assassination attempt.
White: The Umayyad Dynasty (661-750), Damascus
The Umayyads ruled for ninety years, taking white as their symbolic color as a reminder of the Prophet's first battle at Badr, and to distinguish themselves from the Abbasids, by using white, rather than black, as their color of mourning. Mu'awia Ibn Abi Sufian (661-750), founder of the Umayyad state, proclaimed himself Caliph of Jerusalem.
Black: The Prophet Mohammad (570-632)
In the seventh century, with the rise of Islam and subsequent liberation of Mecca, two flags - one white, one black - were carried. On the white flag was written, "There is no god but God (Allah) and Mohammad is the Prophet of God."
In pre-Islamic times, the black flag was a sign of revenge. It was the color of the headdress worn when leading troops into battle. Both black and white flags were placed in the mosque during Friday prayers.
The Abbasid Dynasty (750-1258), ruling from Baghdad, took black as a symbol of mourning for the assassination of relatives of the Prophet and in remembrance of the Battle of Karbala.

Quoted source: Mahdi Abdul Hadi, Evolution of the Arab Flag, Amman, February 1986


Arab Revolt Flag

From the PASSIA home page:

"Sharif Hussein designed the flag of the Arab Revolt on June 1916. The Palestinian people raised it as the flag of the Arab National movement in 1917. In 1947, the Arab Ba'ath Party interpreted the flag as a symbol of the liberation and unity of the Arab nation. The Palestinian people readopted the flag at the Palestinian conference in Gaza in 1948. The flag was recognized by the Arab League as the flag of the Palestinian people. It was further endorsed by the PLO, the representative of the Palestinians, at the Palestinian conference in Jerusalem in 1964."

Quoted source: Evolution of the Arab Flag, by Mahdi Abdul Hadi, Amman, Feb. 1986.

After the fall of Hejaz the colors were used by Husain's sons 'Abdulla (emir of the Transjordan) and Faisal (king of Iraq). Later on they became known as the Pan-Arab colors.

Harald Müller, 13 March 1996

The flag of Sharif Hussein of Hejaz, was a conscious union of the old Islamic dynasties, plus the red of Sharifian clan. The red also came to symbolise revolt against the Turks. Husain's 3 sons became kings of Jordan, Syria, and Iraq, hence the minor differentiations in the Sharifian flag. Hussein's original intent was for his flag to be identical in those 3 countries with the addition of one star for Jordan-Palestine, two stars for Iraq, and three stars for Syria. The Jordanian one is the only that has survived, and the Palestinians use the same flag without the star as a tie to their original territorial integrity. (Palestine and Transjordan were split in 1923 to clarify that a Jewish homeland did not apply to the latter.) In 1961 Kuwait switched from its red Gulf flag to a Sharifian variant.

T. F. Mills, April 1998

During World War I, Arabs in the Hejaz (the Red Sea coast of the Arabian peninsula) rose up against the Ottoman Sultan, with the help of the British, who were fighting the Ottomans at the time. The revolt was headed by the Hashemite dynasty of Mecca, and their banner was red, white, green, and red. Jordan is the last state left with a Hashemite ruling king, and thus its flag is closest to the original model. The colours are intended to correspond to the early Islamic dynasties of the first half of the middle ages; this is probably an "invented tradition," as the use of flags by such dynasties is anachronistic.

The Hashemite revolt was the Arab world's first embrace of European-style nationalism, but it was largely unsuccessful, mostly due to lack of Western support. The Arab-speaking areas of the old Ottoman empire were mostly divided up between France and England, though the British did install Hashemite princes as local rulers in the areas they controlled. Even in the Hejaz, the Hashemites were driven out by the Wahabi Saudi dynasty, which, then as now, was less concerned with Arab nationalism than in its doctrine of religious fundamentalism. Nevertheless the flag was remembered as associated with Arab nationalism, even if the Hashemite dynasty was not.

Joshua Fruhlinger, 11 January 1999

Source (you'll have to go here to access the above links):

http://www.fotw.net/flags/arabcols.html

Jordan:

http://www.fotw.net/flags/jo.html

"Palestine":

http://www.fotw.net/flags/ps.html

Also worth noting:

The flag of the Hejaz was designed by Sir Mark Sykes of the British Foreign Office for the Arab forces under the Sherif Hussein operating with Allenby in Palestine.

http://www.fotw.net/flags/hejaz.html

50 posted on 06/09/2002 9:15:50 PM PDT by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB
Beelzebubba, you say!
51 posted on 06/09/2002 9:20:31 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Thinkin' Gal
Good point, and they are revolting. They are trying to set the world on fire.
52 posted on 06/09/2002 10:17:45 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Tycobb
2 comments - I've heard it said that "give us this day our daily bread" looks forward to your #3 - famine. And re your screenname, DYK about the story that Mr. Cobb was saved in the hospital, and said to a visitor "Tell people not to wait as long as I did!"? I hope it's true, I'd like to meet the cleaned-up Mr. Cobb.
53 posted on 06/09/2002 10:27:25 PM PDT by 185JHP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tycobb
As one who has been an avid studier of the Bible and History for 30+ years, been exposed to others that had studied it all their lives, and as one who has seen the "predicters of doom and gloom" pontificate that current events are foretold in Revelation for those same 30 years over and over with the end right around the corner(perhaps, eventually they will be right, but only the Father knows the day and hour.) I submit that anyone that looks to the book of Revelation as prophecy to us, is ignorant of the Bible, as well as of History, and may be following a false prophet already.

Interpreted properly, scripture doesn't have to be reinterpreted and re-reinterpreted year after year after year. It also doesn't contradict itself. If Revelation really was prophecy of current events, then what are we to do with the words of the Lord that say his return will be with out sign, and as a thief in the night?

No. To give a future tense to all of Revelation is folly, both Biblically and Historically, and the Lord told us as much when he said that it is a wicked and sinful generation that seeks signs from God.(seeking to know when to turn from their sins, in hopes of redemption.)

Revelation itself means to reveal, to warn, and it was a warning, but not to us. In Ch.1 V.4 John clearly states that the book is written to the seven Churches in Asia. In ch. 11, V.1-FF John is given a measuring rod and told to measure the Temple, but to exclude the outer court, because it has been given to the Gentiles. It's quite obvious that this is refering to the Temple that was destroyed in AD70, by Nero's soldiers.

This places the time period that Revelation was written to pre-AD70. History proves that Nero's Rome at that time was very hostile to Christians. Citizens were required to take an oath to Nero as their Lord, recieve a tattoo on their head or hand in order to buy, sell and reside in Rome or face torture and eventual death if they refused, and the policies were fast expanding to the rest of the Empire.(Sounds like an excellent candidate for the AC to me) This is also the reason Revelation is written in it's cryptic style. The seven Churches to whom it was penned understood it perfectly.(Nero and his ministers would have been clueless) For us to understand it's meanings takes the understanding that it wasn't written to us, but for us, and in depth study of Daniel and the other Apocalyptic(symbolic language) Books of the Old Testament.

Historical perspective helps as well, and while it is not inspired and infallible, as the scripture clearly is, early Roman historians were under penalty of death should they record something incorrectly. With those caveots always in mind, Flavious Josephus, Roman historian of the period, describes in the siege and fall of Jerusalem in AD67-70,(War of the Jews) that 1.1 million Jews perished with the uncounted remainder dispersed to the four corners of the Earth, sold into slavery for a pittance(The Dispora).

Many other elements of the siege and fall of Jerusalem, and Judea are contained within his writtings, but for the sake of brievety, I'll for go them here. You are however welcome to read them for yourself here- War of the Jews by Flavious Josephus

54 posted on 06/09/2002 10:55:13 PM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Basil Duke
You asserted that Stalin took East Germany because of "chaos." I contend that Stalin took East Germany because the Americans and Great Britain let him. Your assertion is incorrect. Read a book. Might clear things up for you. The final point in your response is bizarre. You ask what good could have come had the Allies NOT agreed to let the Soviet Union gobble up East Germany. "Nada," you say. Now, gee, I wonder just what of a positive nature might have come out of Stalin being denied the ability to enslave eastern Europe. Mmmmm, that's a toughie.
55 posted on 06/10/2002 6:40:10 AM PDT by Basil Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tycobb
Are you familiar with the PaRDeS system of Biblical interpretation? John and Revelation were written on the 'Sod' level. Have a look see...
Pardes Sod John Revelation

"He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the assembilies. To him who overcomes I shall give to eat from the tree of life, which is in the midst of the Paradise of Elohim."
Revelation 2:7

Gan Eden
Garden of Eden
Paradise
PaRDeS...

56 posted on 06/10/2002 10:47:19 AM PDT by Jeremiah Jr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thinkin' Gal
Hi T.G. thanks for putting that together.
Was researching the "Black Flags of the Mahdi"..and came upon your resource page via the Flags of Sudan.
I wanted to post some Muslim web pages..but they go on and on...its hard to follow the train of thought.
The Mahdi of Chinese Gordons day and Osamma have much in common.
The 1880-1 Madhi desired slaughtering ,and making example of Muslims who were in compliance with the British.
At Khartoum..he slaughtered nearly 5000 Egyptians to make his point [Egypt being seen as a vassal of the British.
Osamma has revealed his disdain for the House of Saud and their control over the Holy Places.
Yet..in looking back..this message was that of the Ayatollah Khomeini in Iran.
Clearly Al Qaeda is an offshoot of this..via the Wahabbi in Saudi Arabia.
In researching the resurgence of the "Black Flags of the Mahdi"..recent events have been revealed...most are covered up to some dgree in the Arab press...but rallies are occuring in Jordan..Egypt..North Arfica etc.
They may be Pro Osamma..Pro Palestinian rallies..but the manifestation of the Black flags and the script appears allong side.
About 2 months ago there was a huge Hizbullah rally in Beruit...nearly 100,000....I saw some pictures..they were "Chilling" to say the least.
I believe the Palestinian issue is going to fall to the wayside soon...the Higher message of purity to Islamic law will zenith with Emotional passion.
Were in a lull right now..but somethings coming.
57 posted on 06/10/2002 6:45:52 PM PDT by Light Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Tycobb
The first one should be "Wars and rumors of war"...given History it is difficult to narrow that down....but it definitely fits the world today.

The second one is translated Ethnos against Ethnos...

This means Ethnic groups against Ethnic Groups...another scenario that fits today...strongly.

The third....famine is a large part of what is going on in both China and East Asia as well as Africa.

The fourth.....Pestilence...is yet to manifest in the way I believe the Word is talking about...I believe it is sooner rather then later.

58 posted on 06/10/2002 6:56:02 PM PDT by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Light Speed
but somethings coming.


59 posted on 06/10/2002 6:57:10 PM PDT by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Tycobb
The Four Horsemen area already here.

See http://www.weeklyworldnews.com/bizarre/bizarre.cfm?instanceid=18445

Reprinted here:

PARIS - A funny thing happened on the way to Doomsday - the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse got lost and had to ask for directions!

That is the wild story of a French police officer who claims that one of the fearsome riders trotted up to him on the roadside and sheepishly asked, "Do you know the way to Rome?"

"It was the one on a red horse, holding a broad-sword. I guess that must be the Second Horseman, the War guy," highway patrolman Michel Clenard told a Paris newspaper.

"I was totally taken aback. I mean, these guys are supposed to be determining the fate of all mankind - but they seem to have no Earthly idea where they're going. And I didn't know whether to point them in the right direction or send them on a wild goose chase."

According to prophecies in the Holy Bible, a warning sign that the end of the world is near will be the arrival of four mysterious horsemen, representing the major calamities that will plague man in the last days - war, famine, pestilence and death (Rev. 6:2-8).

The uncanny encounter took place 13 miles outside Paris on the highway from Dijon. Officer Clenard was assisting a female motorist whose auto had broken down on the side of the road, when he first spotted the hooded horsemen and their giant steeds.

"They had stopped on the other side of the road and they were arguing over their map about which way to go," said Officer Clenard. "I was concerned because cars were whizzing by really fast and the horses seemed like they were getting anxious."

Officer Clenard said eventually one of the horsemen was sent over to his patrol car.

"The guy seemed reluctant and when he got close enough for me to recognize him from illustrations in my Bible, I understood why," he said. "The guys are supposed to be these big, bad harbingers of doom - asking for help must have been humiliating."

Officer Clenard said the Second Horseman spoke in an antiquated form of French.

"I advised him to keep his sword sheathed and I gave him directions, but I'm not sure he got them right," the cop said. "When the riders took off, two of them headed the wrong way!" Published on: December 11, 2001

60 posted on 06/10/2002 7:03:09 PM PDT by Rodney King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson