Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberal Groups Back Away From Book on 10-Year-Old Homosexual
CNSNews.com ^ | June 10, 2002 | Matt Pyeatt

Posted on 06/10/2002 7:16:41 AM PDT by H8DEMS

(CNSNews.com) - Simon and Schuster has published a novel featuring a 10-year-old boy who is homosexual, which is reportedly expected to be stocked in schools and libraries in Great Britain.

But America's largest teacher's union and library group are taking a hands-off approach with how to deal with the book and whether it should be placed on bookshelves in this country's schools and libraries.

According to a report in the British newspaper The Guardian, the book, entitled Strange Boy, tells the story of a boy who has a crush on a 14-year-old male friend.

Simon and Schuster admitted its decision to place the book on its "youth list," which is aimed at children as young as 13, would be controversial.

"Some people will doubtless pick up on the gay elements of the book, which are treated frankly and honestly, as being shocking and controversial," editor Stephen Cole was quoted by the newspaper. "I would argue that the real controversy of Strange Boy lies in the fact that it's not making a big deal out of having a gay child as its protagonist."

Whether the book will cross the pond to the U.S. remains to be seen but at this point, the National Education Association (NEA), the nation's largest teacher's union, said it would not be involved in determining whether the book would make its way into American schools.

NEA spokesman Darryl Figueroa said just because a book appears in British schools and libraries doesn't mean it will find its way to the U.S. "I wouldn't necessarily see that as a natural jump," she said.

Figueroa said that if controversy over the book did come up, it wouldn't matter because the NEA would not have anything to say about it.

"It is really not our decision about what curricula is used at various schools or what books are put in the libraries," she said. "That is not something that the teacher's union has any power over."

While the NEA may not have direct control over library book selections in schools, the union has a well-established track record of supporting homosexual advocacy in public schools.

The NEA helped develop, endorsed and distributed a guide to teachers and principles denouncing reparative therapies for homosexuals, and provides members with information about addressing homosexuality in schools, including teacher-led discussions about participating in events geared to homosexuality.

The position of the American Library Association (ALA) is that local school districts would determine whether Strange Boy would be among available reading material next fall.

"I would guess that it would be individual school districts that would make a decision like that," Beverly Becker, spokesperson for the ALA, said. "Most of those decisions take place locally."

Like the NEA, the ALA also actively supports the distribution of books focused on homosexuality. The library group has an annual award dedicated to "gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered writing," has worked with various homosexual groups in "diversity" conferences and sponsored the "Gay Teens in the 21st Century" program in Chicago in 2000.

Simon & Schuster could not be reached for comment about the book, Strange Boy, Friday. The book publishing company operates in Australia, Canada, The United Kingdom and the United States.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Free Republic; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: education; homosexuals; school
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
Simon and Schuster admitted its decision to place the book on its "youth list," which is aimed at children as young as 13, would be controversial.
1 posted on 06/10/2002 7:16:41 AM PDT by H8DEMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: H8DEMS
You know, many young boys look up to older boys as what they'd like to be (stronger, more assured, more popular, etc. etc.) But what the homosexual groups want is to take any young kid who knows virtually nothing about sexuality, and push him into the homosexual lifestyle before he's even had a chance to let his sexuality develop naturally and normally - and before he's even had a chance to develop the natural and normal attraction for girls. They are kid snatchers. And they seek to act without parents' knowing or consenting to what's going on. It is an evil trade they ply.
2 posted on 06/10/2002 7:23:21 AM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: H8DEMS
Well, isn't that lovely. (barf!)
3 posted on 06/10/2002 7:26:29 AM PDT by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: H8DEMS;Khepera;JMJ333;ArGee;EODGUY
Invasion of the Baby Snatchers.
4 posted on 06/10/2002 7:29:52 AM PDT by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: H8DEMS
Liberal Groups Back Away From Book On 10-Year-Old Homosexual
5 posted on 06/10/2002 7:29:55 AM PDT by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yendu bwam
You are correct. They want to take a young child and make him/her think that emulating an older friend/sibling is equal to falling in love with that person.

The homosexual community did not make it to the desired in-roads as quickly as it had hoped so they are leapfrogging to the children. Liberals and homosexuals are learning that if they get to the children first, they can circumvent conservatives.

6 posted on 06/10/2002 7:31:49 AM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yendu bwam
Boys AND girls have same-sex crushes as a normal part of their development! I agree that far too many of these children will be brain-washed into believing that if they've EVER had "romantic" feelings toward the same sex that this means they are homosexual. The type of yearnings children have toward their same-sex friends at that age is more like hero-worship or feelings of closeness and is usually not sexual.

What's sad is in NORMAL development, these early crushes take a back seat to a renewed interest in the OPPOSITE sex.

7 posted on 06/10/2002 7:33:16 AM PDT by lsee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: H8DEMS
I don't feel like contributing today. ~~~ Wait until you see "Unable to locate server"
I don't have money. ~~~ Help with the fundraiser. Bump the threads, ping your FRiends.
There's plenty of time to donate. ~~~ Bill collectors don't see it that way.
I don't know where to contribute. ~~~ Credit card, mail: FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 , Paypal: JimRob@psnw.com
I've got too many other things to do first. ~~~ Don't we all?
I can't contribute much, what's five dollars. ~~~ If everyone contributed one dollar a month, we'd never have a fundraiser again.
The dog ate my credit card. ~~~ Shoot the dog.
Just let me finish freeping. ~~~ BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Don't wait until it's too late. Do it today. Do it now! Free Republic is funded solely by us. It's up to us to keep it running. Do your part, contribute if you can. Bump the fundraising threads. Help keep this place alive!

8 posted on 06/10/2002 7:35:01 AM PDT by WIMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lsee
The type of yearnings children have toward their same-sex friends at that age is more like hero-worship or feelings of closeness and is usually not sexual.

Distributing this book, with its homosexual overtones, to young boys, should be considered child abuse. Schools should have no business teaching anything about sexuality to our kids, other than the basic biologic facts. Parents have abdicated their rights to instruct their kids in the complex subject of sexuality to homosexuals, Planned Parenthood types, pro-abortionists, and the enablers of the sexually promiscous. It's time to protect your children, and to TAKE THE SCHOOLS BACK.

9 posted on 06/10/2002 7:37:30 AM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yendu bwam
They are kid snatchers. And they seek to act without parents' knowing or consenting to what's going on. It is an evil trade they ply.

Absolutely. Homosexual activists and their supporters are child molesters. They have inserted their perverted sexual behavior into the minds of very young children (5, 6, 7, 8,9 years old) and forced the children and their parents to address this perversion. Children at this age are unable to grasp the reality of this perversion and I think having it shoved down their throat by teachers, television, movies, activists as a "positive, normal" activity, has great potential to harm their normal sexual development. They want to pervert them before they have any chance of establishing normal sexual desires. Misery loves company.

10 posted on 06/10/2002 7:43:07 AM PDT by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yendu bwam
They are kid snatchers. And they seek to act without parents' knowing or consenting to what's going on. It is an evil trade they ply.

Sorta helps one understand a key link between homosexuals and the pro-aborts.

Assuming anyone else -- like me -- wonders what the hell homosexuals care about the female Breeder's "right" to off her own.

11 posted on 06/10/2002 7:59:13 AM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dakmar
Simon and Schuster has seen the last of my money.
12 posted on 06/10/2002 8:00:34 AM PDT by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
Sorta helps one understand a key link between homosexuals and the pro-aborts.

What about pro-life homosexuals?
13 posted on 06/10/2002 8:00:39 AM PDT by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
A little something for the reading circle in Michael's classrom.
14 posted on 06/10/2002 8:00:50 AM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JMJ333
Unfortunately not, I'm afraid. You subsidize them any time you pay taxes that end up in local school funds.
15 posted on 06/10/2002 8:10:42 AM PDT by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: WIMom
And alas, the infamous panhandler strikes again! *zoink!* *bam*
16 posted on 06/10/2002 8:20:48 AM PDT by Windsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dakmar
Rats. I still haven't gotten over subsidizing PP.

Someone should write to them and ask why they don't make a book about little johnny and his secret crush on his dog. Can't leave out the beastials, can we? Someone might get their feelings hurt--except the ignorant Christians--who cares if they're offended.

I swear I will never buy another book from them again.

17 posted on 06/10/2002 8:30:26 AM PDT by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
I'm sure there are some. I can't think of any public figures right off the bat nor among my friends (which is strange given how many of my close friends are homosexual). I think a couple of the Catholics I know still would be against it in principle. I seem to remember a friend of mine tending to his niece once after she came to the city for an abortion. He didn't approve of it and agonized over the whole deal but probably took a pragmatic view of the whole thing. She was within her rights, what's done is done, sort of thing.

I think the connection is twofold:

  1. The issue is a litmus test for liberals. It's probably the Key issue, actually, by which the ragtag Rainbow Coalition of minorities and victims is morphed into a scythe they turn on their own -- and the rest of society -- with all due "Empowerment".

    (The really great thing being that all this sound and fury over "fighting" to keep it legal is such a joke given the fact that Republicans have recognized Legal Abortion as absolutely critical to successful population control since 1974 (NSSM-200). Suckers.)

  2. Legal abortion is not only the linchpin of the GOP-mandated policy of population control at home and abroad, it's also the foundation for the Human Non-Personhood which enables President Bush to use "Excess" manufacture lives for research and affords homosexuals the ability to manufacture their "own" children.

Because the "right" to have a child (particularly one confected to spec ... as for the lesbians who wanted both of their children to be deaf) turns on ability to make best use of the window of Non-Personhood President Bush nailed open, I can see where it would be in the interest of homosexuals to support abortion.

Without the Mother-Only right to homocide, no one (not homosexuals, infertile breeders or Uncle Sam) would be able to buy, sell, experiment upon, destroy -- and sometimes implant in a uterus, even -- the distinct unborn human lives folks like to pretend are tadpoles, not frogs.

18 posted on 06/10/2002 9:12:01 AM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
A little something for the reading circle in Michael's classrom.

Michael, a homosexual 3rd grade teacher,is a busy boy:

We had our first Gay Pride Week Committee meeting at school.

Read several reviews of this book in the British press. They are more concerned about the plot development than they are about the content.

19 posted on 06/10/2002 10:25:38 AM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JMJ333
Simon and Schuster has seen the last of my money.

They are quite diverse in their titles. S&S also published Rush Limbaugh's two best sellers (through their Pocket Books division).

20 posted on 06/10/2002 11:53:16 AM PDT by Constitutionalist Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson