Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE JUDGE AS PROSECUTOR: TWO DAYS AT THE "TRIAL" OF SLOBODAN MILOSEVIC
Emperor's Clothes ^ | June 19, 2002 | Ian Johnson, Jared Israel

Posted on 06/19/2002 10:52:54 AM PDT by joan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-123 next last
To: SANDNES
That you would defend using such a site is telling.

Let me put it to you like this: If a socialist or a communist told me that the sky really is blue, I'd still go outside and check, just to be sure.

Now you state this: By the way rdb3 this is a global sight and if you just want to hear the people who have the same prejudices as yourself,you should stick to frequenting, your local Country and Western bars on a friday night.

Not so bad in the beginning, but you quickly went to ad hominem city.

Not so good.

61 posted on 06/23/2002 9:29:54 AM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

Comment #62 Removed by Moderator

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

Comment #64 Removed by Moderator

To: SANDNES
There is no smoke without fire as the saying goes.

Precisely. That's why once I clicked on your source I realized which fire your smoke was coming from. Now it all makes sense...

Because it is Socialist doesn't necessarily mean it is untrue. The contents ring in many ways true. Of course they have an 'agenda', but who hasn't. Their 'agenda' is very well known. They hold Trotsky and Lenin and want to accuse others of crimes against humanity?!?!?! Why don't you find me some pro american articles on their website.. Can ya?

None of this gets away from the fact that over 400 prisoners of war were unecessarily killed (massacred).

That's a fact? Since when?? It was a prison uprising. They had weapons. Michael Spann did not die of old age. The intent was there--you only had to listen to Rumsfeld at the time, I saw American military openly advocating killing El Queda and not taking prisoners on FOX news.

Rumsfeld clearly said that we are taking prisoners, but if they don't want to lay down their arms.... How is that different from any other war? And we did in fact take them prisoners, did we not?

By the way how come you lot can have an informed opinion on the events when it was remaindered on the American networks just after the deed was done. (And I am sure you did not want to think about it as well.)

So according to you, the uprising never took place?

By the way rdb3 this is a global sight and if you just want to hear the people who have the same prejudices as yourself,you should stick to frequenting, your local Country and Western bars on a friday night.

You can be pretty sure that any editorials from communist/socialist sources will be frowned upon here. We are familiar with their ideals, their goals, and their history has been well documented. I was born and lived till the age of 11 in a communist state. If I have a prejudice against communists/socialists then its from my own experiences, and that of my family and friends. My mind has been made up. Hence I am on FR - because communists are not welcome here.

65 posted on 06/23/2002 9:39:45 AM PDT by BrooklynGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: SANDNES
Give me an example of what you think is an 'objective source' Go on I dare you!

I told you before. Don't read editorials, look at the facts and make up your own mind.

66 posted on 06/23/2002 9:40:59 AM PDT by BrooklynGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: SANDNES
I would do the same with the New York Times.

Good. We agree on something. NY Times is a leftist rag.

67 posted on 06/23/2002 9:41:26 AM PDT by BrooklynGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: SANDNES
The New York Times is a socialist rag. Need I say more?
68 posted on 06/23/2002 9:54:20 AM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: SANDNES
I was wrong on that comment!

Fuhgedaboudit.

69 posted on 06/23/2002 9:58:50 AM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: bluester
I would point out that this article is a manifestation of these two's ideology.

Which brings us back to your two skinheads and your taking at face value any of the 'facts' they present to you to support their views. I.e, if they tell you the Slovenian Finance Minister is, and 7 of Slovenia's largest banks are run by Jews, (I'm just making this up as a hypothetical, by the way) do you believe them or do you research the matter on your own?

In my view, I'm not lending them any credence and will check everything they say.

Much easier just to get your information from a better source, no?

And if it turns out that they help old ladies across the street in their spare time and have some interesting information in regards to a seperate topic, that's fine - but it doesn't repair the relationship between their views and their credibility in my eyes - the one erases the other.

70 posted on 06/23/2002 11:27:52 AM PDT by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SANDNES
Ah yes, there you are wielding influence and winning support.
Go bother someone else, euroweenie.
Keep up the good work, Sandnes.
71 posted on 06/23/2002 11:42:29 AM PDT by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Hoplite
I must admit you've made a pretty good point, and it's hard to argue with it. :(

As far as the communists/socialists are concerned, all I actually wanted to say is that even among them there are differences, not all of them are Leninists, Maoists, Stalinists or Milosevic supporters. Even if they critisize NATO or the Hague court, it doesn't mean they like Milosevic or the kind of policy. I also wouldn't throw them automatically in the same bag as Neo-nazis that support Hitler and his policy. Especially since many of them don't promote a hateful, intolerant or even violent actions as is the case with the neo-nazis.

As for believing people, I would definetely research the matter on my own, no matter how close they may be to me in ideological views or in any other way. I don't take everything for granted, that's for sure.

72 posted on 06/23/2002 11:46:28 AM PDT by bluester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: bluester
No worries - some of the milder forms of socialism, such as Sweden, seem to do alright, at least if one judges by the voter's acceptance of a system given free and fair elections. In those instances, an exchange of ideas is perfectly suitable for gaining knowledge and a fresh perspective.

On the other hand, proponents of failed systems, who carry their beliefs forward through historical denial and revisionism, hold no interest for me.

They are curiosities to be viewed for amusement purposes only.

And yes, trust is earned, whether talking about friends, pundits, government spokespersons, or even fellow Freepers.

73 posted on 06/23/2002 4:46:52 PM PDT by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Let me put it to you like this: If a socialist or a communist told me that the sky really is blue, I'd still go outside and check, just to be sure.

I would not. Socialists or communists are perfectly capable of speaking truth as well as people from the right are capable of telling the lies.

The best way to discern the truth is to listen to the all sides instead of believing blindly YOUR party line. You might become similar to a Communist if you do not think on your own.

Simone Weil (French woman philosopher) said - "The Truth is a refugee from the camp of winners".

74 posted on 06/23/2002 6:55:34 PM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
The best way to discern the truth is to listen to the all sides instead of believing blindly YOUR party line.

But I don't have or belong to a "party." Therefore, the charge of "believing blindly" is dismissed with prejudice. I'm a conservative free-agent.

One more thing, I absolutely loathe communists and socialists with a passion that is indescribable. Since I admitted this, it shouldn't be a stretch to see my logic in not listening to a thing they have to say.

75 posted on 06/23/2002 6:59:51 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: SANDNES
d00d I would vote Rumsfeld for pres if he would massacre every man in al queda. I would pay to personally do it.
76 posted on 06/23/2002 7:20:09 PM PDT by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
One more thing, I absolutely loathe communists and socialists with a passion that is indescribable. Since I admitted this, it shouldn't be a stretch to see my logic in not listening to a thing they have to say.

Well, but do not expect others to be so passionate.

77 posted on 06/23/2002 7:39:43 PM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Well, but do not expect others to be so passionate.

I never raised an expectation on anyone.

However, for a conservative not to be "passionate"[ly] against communism and socialism is suspect in my eyes. The two ideologies mix just like oil and water: they don't.

78 posted on 06/23/2002 7:52:10 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
I would not. Socialists or communists are perfectly capable of speaking truth as well as people from the right are capable of telling the lies.

and...

You might become similar to a Communist if you do not think on your own.

What's wrong with being a communist? According to you, they are an honest bunch.

79 posted on 06/23/2002 8:09:53 PM PDT by BrooklynGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: BrooklynGOP
What's wrong with being a communist?

Mistaken worldview. Atheism.

According to you, they are an honest bunch.

No, only SOME of them are honest. Same with the anti-communists.

80 posted on 06/23/2002 9:01:17 PM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson