Posted on 02/01/2007 6:08:27 PM PST by UCAL
On July 25, 2004, the Red Sox and Yankees tussled at Boston’s historic Fenway Park. The then-presumptive Democratic nominee for President was Massachusetts’ own John Kerry. On the campaign trail, Kerry had routinely professed to be a die-hard Sox fan, even though in an interview a month earlier he named as his all time favorite Sox player a man who never actually played for the Red Sox. In order to demonstrate his Ordinary Joe bona fides to a watchful and suspicious nation, Kerry made a splashy show of attending that evening’s game.
To celebrate Kerry’s rare mingling with the hoi polloi, Kerry’s handlers cooked up a typically misguided plan in which Kerry would toss out the ceremonial first pitch while an Army veteran who had just returned from tours in Afghanistan and Iraq served as his personal catcher. In so doing, Kerry would bask in the affection of his local fan base as well as honor America’s military.
The plan quickly went awry. Much to Team Kerry’s surprise, the putative local hero was greeted by more boos than cheers by the Fenway faithful. When the time came to toss the first pitch, Kerry embarrassed himself by weakly heaving up an anemic lob that barely made it two thirds of the way to the military man awaiting Kerry’s throw. As if all this weren’t bad enough, Kerry blamed his pathetic pitch on his catcher, the just-returned Iraq veteran. Kerry asserted, “I held back. He was very nervous. I tried to lob it gently.”
JOHN KERRY IS NOT POPULAR IN MASSACHUSETTS. Take it from a native – he never has been. We have a familiarity with him that the rest of the nation lacks. That familiarity has bred contempt. The above anecdote, from the boos that greeted him at Fenway Park to his churlish response to his own womanish throw illustrates both the fact that we don’t like him and why we don’t like him.
Perhaps you prefer your data in a harder form. If so, there’s this: John Kerry got a lower percentage of the presidential vote in Massachusetts than Al Gore did four years ago. What’s more, Kerry didn’t have Ralph Nader siphoning away votes from him the way Gore did. And if you think Kerry’s performance lagged behind Gore’s because Bay State residents had developed a fondness for President Bush and his Texas swagger during his four years in office, think again. The only explanation for Kerry’s poor performance in ’04 compared to Gore’s in his home state is because those who know Kerry best like him least.
Kerry is up for reelection in ’08. While the rest of the country has rolled its eyes over his post-presidential defeat behavior of botched jokes and photo-ops with Iranian leaders, the Massachusetts electorate has simmered. Ideologically, Kerry is in line with the Commonwealth’s voters, but we don’t like losers. We especially don’t like losers who disgrace our region by performing in an embarrassing fashion. After his presidential loss in 1988, then-Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis had the good sense to not seek reelection in 1990. It was just as well; after the way he had brought shame to the state while seeking national office, he couldn’t have been elected dog-catcher let alone governor.
ON THE OTHER HAND, MASSACHUSETTS LOVES WINNERS. And this is where Kerry might have a serious problem. Red Sox star pitcher and local legend Curt Schilling is reportedly pondering a run against Kerry in 2008.
Wow! Go Curt, um I mean Mr. Schilling.
Kenny Rogers can be his press secretary.
Yeah, sure. Everybody hates Ted Kennedy, too. That's why they've elected him easily every time he's been on the ballot since 1962.
Pingy!!
No, Curt Schilling is planning no such thing.
That would be awesome if flipper got a fastball between the eyes.
Stupid sentence by the author....from a state that will continue to sweep in Fat Teddy and, yes, JFK, for as long as they like.
Those two clowns seats are safer even than Barbara Boxer's.
Story in today's paper said he wants to play ball in '08.
sample letter:
deer kert:
pleez halp us d'feet jon karry. menny of us aktually like bazeball, eeven pichers. we promis 2 vote four yoo, for onley a coupla pax o'smokes an sum walkin round munny.
luv,
teRAYza (shhh!)
My thoughts exactly.
Kenny has more familiarity with the press's jaw than anything else. Don't point a camera at him!
". If so, there’s this: John Kerry got a lower percentage of the presidential vote in Massachusetts than Al Gore did four years ago. "
Awful lot of wishful spin in this article. Did he score lower than Gore? Sure but he still got 62% of the vote in his homestate in the 04 Presidential election and 81% in the 02 race (granted it was against a libretarian). His last close election was against William Weld and he still won by 8%. And the State has gotten more blue since then. The chances of us taking a Senate seat in Mass are slim to none. Particularly with a candidate with no track record whatsoever. Scary and the Swimmer are essentially Senators for life.
That's different, his last name is Kennedy - you know as in John F. Kennedy - as in the greatest President this Nation has ever had. It doesn't matter if you're a drunk, a philanderer or even an idiot (see Patrick Kennedy D-RI) - you just gotta have that name.
Not one of Dean Barnett's better efforts. Frog isn't well-liked in Mass. -- whoop-de-do. The question is whether he can be beaten by a Republican in Mass. And he can't. Also, candidacies by athletes usually don't materialize, and few of them know squat about politics. Star power didn't translate into votes for Lynn Swann, and I'd be surprised if it happened for Curt Schilling -- if he runs, which he probably won't.
Curt is one one the few people that could beat Kerry in Massachusetts.
Yes. This column is a classic time-waster.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.