[Windflier]

She only has the photograph.

Whoa! This is the first that I've heard of this. I didn't read anywhere that Orly only had a photograph of this document. That takes the value of this evidence down quite a few notches, if that's true.

Someone has to have this document in order for Orly to enter it as evidence in the lawsuit. I can't imagine a court accepting just a photograph of it as evidence.

[RetroSexual]

The brief claims that she’s submitting a color photocopy of the original, but that does not mean that she does not possess the original. I wouldn’t trust that document to anybody, especially the corrupt Federal Judiciary.

Eventually, someone’s going to have to go to Kenya and look up the original record, which is pointed to by the document. Unless some O-Hole got there first and destroyed it.

[perchprism]

If you read the filing, she has a color photocopy of the original ‘copy’, and supplies a photograph of that with the filing.

[John Valentine]

That is what she says in her filing with the court.

You have to go with what you have. This certainly ought to be enough to get the letters rogatory that she is asking for to authenticate the information.

“The undersigned counsel for Plaintiffs has acquired possession of a color copy of one certain document (attached as Exhibit A to this motion), regarding which there are no ready means of authentication except by recovery of the original document. As should be apparent from the nature and content of the document, if authenticated, and shown to be genuine, the contents of this document will significantly narrow and shorten the discovery and pre-trial litigation period necessary in this case, and might lead to an early resolution by settlement or transfer of these proceedings to the United States House of Representatives and Senate according the procedures outlined in the Constitution.”

http://www.scribd.com/doc/18018712/03118509264

[Smokeyblue]

“Whoa! This is the first that I’ve heard of this. I didn’t read anywhere that Orly only had a photograph of this document. That takes the value of this evidence down quite a few notches, if that’s true.”

But since the photo gives a book and page number, as well as, registrars there is information that can be corroborated from other places.

[null and void]

I can't imagine a court accepting just a photograph of it as evidence.

Nor can I. but courts a few judges have accepted the FactChuck image as sufficient to not hear the case.