Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Getting mainstream US media to challenge Obama
The International News Magazine ^ | March 27, 2011 | Robert C. Laity

Posted on 03/27/2011 1:48:45 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

US citizens and advocates for the truth about Barack Obama, led by Robert C. Laity have been in daily contact with such folks as Farah and Hannity, Fox News, Topix, Buffalo News, BBC, NY Times and anyone else who would listen.

It may not have been the case that our Main Stream media was silent out of Fear. It may have been that they were influenced by Money and Power. Barack Obama is a New World Order advocate and the World is a big place.

Obama’s agenda along with others like George H.W. Bush and Son is the ushering in of this New World Order. How many people in high places were offered a piece of that huge pie?

The Main Stream media is now being beset upon by insurmountable pressure from the people at the grassroots level. at this point in time. As Washington Times writer Jeff Kuhner, recently said the issue is growing and it is not going away. http://www.youtube/watch?v=Z4lUIOEssYs

The U.S. Main Stream Media folks who sat on their hands for months remaining silent,is now, due to this public pressure attempting to “Save face”, to save their hides from being named as accomplices to Obama’s fraud and treason, trying to now proffer some semblance of a reasonable explanation why they did not speak out on this major issue until now.

The U.S. Main Stream Media, Judges, Legislators, the Major political party bosses. They are all subject to being called misprisioners of felonious fraud and treason.

My God, Nancy Pelosi,our ex-Speaker of the House fraudulently signed off on Obama’s constitutional qualifications to be President. http://americangrandjury.org/public/

Pelosi also started a ruckus in Congress at the precise point at which past Vice-President Cheney was required to ask for Objections to the Electoral College tally. The question “Are there any objections” was not asked. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcGt8hQZzg4

If there is no requirement to prove that one is an NBC by actually producing a Birth Certificate, no force of Law, then, I ask you, how was John McCain “required” to show his BC and Obama not made to do so. I say this was play acting by the Congress. The Resolution declaring McCain an Natural-Born Citizen is without legal force and was declared under color of Law. Indeed, as Judy Muthoni commented in the Kenyan Daily Nation on the Day Obama literally “Took” the office of “President of the United States”, the ruling elite wins either way, no matter who wins.

Obama and McCain are equally disqualified. The two major candidates were not then,and are not now, eligible to be President. Military bases are not considered US Soil. The issue of who is a Natural-Born Citizen is so simple even I understand it. It is a very simple truth. Is the Congress and the Media of the impression that the American people are so gullible and ignorant that they don’t understand the issue? Do they really think that the American People do not realize that Obama is a fraud?

The definition of a Natural-Born Citizen is incorporated by reference in the US Constitutiion at Article 1, Sec.8. The Congress has the power to define and punish offenses of the “Law of Nations”, a treatise on the understanding of the application of Natural Law as it affects the whole of the Nations of the Earth, that certain ideas and concepts,such as the rights inherent to mankind, are naturally determined. The Law of Nations was ubiquitously used in the Courts of both the United States of America and Britain in the 18th Century. The Law of Nations defines a Natural Born Citizen as one born in a country of citizen parents. That is “parents” with an “s”.,both Parents.

The concept “Of the Blood” or Jus Sanguinis means the ancestral bloodline of a person. If both Parents are American Citizens, their child is of 100% U.S. Jus Sanguinis. If one parent is a foreigner, a Child born to the couple has only 50% U.S. Jus Sanguinis., the Child has 50% Jus Sanguinis of the foreign nation.

The Concept “Of the Soil” or Jus Soli means the actual country in which one is born. A Child born in the U.S. has 100% U.S Jus Soli. However, if that Child’s Parents, both of them, are not American than that child, although he/she may have been born in the U.S. does not have 100% U.S. Jus Sanguinis as required by the US Constitution to be President and Vice-President. Both parents must be citizens of a Country for their “Posterity”, born in said country, to be considered Natural-born citizens of said country. Children born of foreigners in a country are not “Natural-Born Citizens” of said country.

There are only two cases, two positions in the U.S. Government that absolutely mandates that the highest standard of Citizenship be met, ”Natural-Born Citizen”. Those are the Office of the Presidency of the United States and the Vice-President of the United States who is in line to attain to that office if necessary. Obama patently does not meet that requirement and it does not take a Rocket Scientist to see that “very simple truth”.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 03/27/2011 1:48:49 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
(Art.).....The Main Stream media is now being beset upon .....<sic>

Time to reintroduce basic English orthography to the school curriculum.

"Media" is a plural. "Media is" is a solecism. "Beset" does not invite the use of "upon", as in "set upon". Don't these people have proofreaders?

2 posted on 03/27/2011 2:17:23 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus (Concealed carry is a pro-life position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
Have you seen Idiocracy yet?
3 posted on 03/27/2011 2:18:20 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet ("You cannot invade the US There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass." Yamamoto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Have you seen Idiocracy yet?

Yeah, every day. Oh, you mean the movie? That too, and it didn't take 500 years to get there.

4 posted on 03/27/2011 2:24:27 AM PDT by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Beg to differ from you on Mckane’s qualification. Being born on a military base with American parents make you one.


5 posted on 03/27/2011 2:42:12 AM PDT by DooDahhhh (hH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn

“Have you seen Idiocracy yet?”

I have not heard of it, but it is obviously about
American people and culture.
(gee. I hope I didn’t not do no mistakes in my posted)


6 posted on 03/27/2011 2:43:12 AM PDT by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DooDahhhh

“Beg to differ from you on Mckane’s qualification. Being born on a military base with American parents make you one.”

Well, the leftist claim that he was born in the city outside of the base.
Since it is a moot point, I quit looking into it, but just this week I read that he was, indeed, born on US controlled territory.
Whatever, it is water under the bridge.


7 posted on 03/27/2011 2:50:24 AM PDT by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

No, haven’t seen it ... barely heard of it.


8 posted on 03/27/2011 2:51:26 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus (Concealed carry is a pro-life position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AlexW

Probably does not matter if he was born off base. I think the military part would cover his ass. On the other hand, Bummer cannot prove anything about his past; very spooky.


9 posted on 03/27/2011 3:00:32 AM PDT by DooDahhhh (hH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DooDahhhh

“Bummer cannot prove anything about his past; very spooky.”

Yes it is, but I now have a little faith that the flood gates
may be starting to open on him, and his past. (knock on wood)
I suspect that even his own Dimowit pals are starting to
get the creeps about this illegal fraud.


10 posted on 03/27/2011 3:10:50 AM PDT by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AlexW

I subscribe to the opinion that all of the required forgeries are in place and the forgers, promised zanadu in the land of unicorns, have been untracably disposed of to secure the final deception. After all of the money spent to keep it under wraps for this long, it is time for them to raise the flag and show everyone just how “stupidly” they have acted.

Now, bring on the beer!/sarc


11 posted on 03/27/2011 3:23:26 AM PDT by mazda77 (Mike Hogan - JAX Mayor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mazda77
At this point, I wonder what would happen if the Obama team raised the flag of revolution, stated that Obama was not an NBC and asked “what are you going to do about it?” Would the US Congress have the stones to do anything about it?
12 posted on 03/27/2011 3:51:20 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Truth29
Would the US Congress have the stones to do anything about it?

Didn't your mother ever warn you about the asking silly questions? I know it was rhetorical but Boehnor must have the air conditioning way too cold in his office because whatever stones he may have had receeded a long time ago, along with the rest of the vaunted Republican leadership.

BTW, have y'all noticed the media has stopped covering or even mentioning Allen West? He is still there making noise, especially in his district, but they figured out their taunts have no effect on him so the only thing left is to plug up their ears, analogisticly.

13 posted on 03/27/2011 4:06:49 AM PDT by mazda77 (Mike Hogan - JAX Mayor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
Never mind the blatant grotesquery inherent in the myriad grammatical malapropisms employed by the inarguable dunce who scribbled this, his bludgeoning and butchery of punctuation alone mark him illegibly ineligible for the author-ity he unconvincingly feigns.

A real shame, too, as the gravitas and import of his topic deserve, nay, demand far better. It is as insulting an affrontery to the sensibilities as it is to the improbably crucial subject matter. Perhaps even so by design.

Makes is easier to ridicule the entire concept if the scribe is an epigraphic disaster worthy only of the most sincere and voluble derision.

Simply put.

8^D

14 posted on 03/27/2011 4:18:53 AM PDT by Gargantua (Palin 2012 ~ "Going Oval")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AlexW
Well, the leftist claim that he was born in the city outside of the base

It doesn't matter if someone is born off the base when parents are out of country for military (government) reasons - they are still "natural born" citizens. My daughter was born in a hospital in Brindisi, Italy. We have papers signed by Cap Weinberger that she is an American citizen.

On the flip side, since she was born on Italian soil, the Italians consider her a citizen - if she had been a boy who later returned to Italy during a certain age, the possibility of conscription into the military may have risen its head.

15 posted on 03/27/2011 4:28:04 AM PDT by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

ping


16 posted on 03/27/2011 4:30:05 AM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb

“It doesn’t matter if someone is born off the base when parents are out of country for military (government) reasons - they are still “natural born” citizens.”

I agree.
I was only reporting what the baby Marxist were screaming as their rebuttal to us birthers.


17 posted on 03/27/2011 4:33:15 AM PDT by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Military bases are not considered US Soil.

Horsesht!

18 posted on 03/27/2011 4:58:35 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich

They are not legally United States territory, RGSpincich. Look into the legal precedents. How can bases be shut down and returned to host nations, if it is legally US territory? The Panama Canal Zone, for instance. Or, all the wrongheaded talk about shutting down Gitmo. Do you really think we’d just up and abandon sovereign lands like that? We wouldn’t. So, it’s not part of the United States, other than by the good graces of the host nation, or by hostile force.


19 posted on 03/27/2011 5:06:29 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I try to avoid reading “articles” which consist entirely of one sentence paragraphs, as this is a prime indicator of a thoughtless rant as opposed to a thought provoking essay.


20 posted on 03/27/2011 5:07:18 AM PDT by CharacterCounts (November 4, 2008 - the day America drank the Kool-Aid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson