Posted on 12/21/2008 8:18:02 AM PST by Calpernia
Cover Letter
Request to refile Petition Lightfoot v Bowen with chief Justice John Roberts
Dear Justice Roberts,
This is an open cover letter and it is being posted on the Internet, you-tube and will be read on a number of radio stations, particularly radio stations around military bases, forwarded to Congress, Senate, Governors of the States and mass media. This legal action, as 20 other actions filed in the past few months is seeking Judicial intervention due to the fact that Mr. Barack Obama, whose father was a Kenyan- British citizen, is not a Natural Born Citizen and is not eligible to be the President of this country. It also states, that Mr. Obama did not prove his citizenship at all, since the state of Hawaii allows issuance of Hawaiian Birth certificates to foreign born children of Hawaiian residents and there is mounting evidence that Mr. Obama was not born in Hawaii, whereby he will not be a citizen at all. The Plaintiffs in this action are a vice-presidential candidate on the ballot, electors and voters. Majority of the plaintiffs have served years of their lives in the US military and risked their lives, pursuant to their oath to defend the Constitution of this country against all enemies, foreign and domestic. The plaintiffs and other members of the US military are deeply concerned about the fact that none of the cases related to Mr. Obama’s lack of eligibility was heard on the merits.
The plaintiffs are also concerned about the following: You have recorded a program “Conversations with Chief Justice Roberts”. Numerous high schools students were flown in to DC and participated in discussion about the Constitution, law and the Supreme Court with you. This program was fully funded by the Annenberg foundation, is it clearly states on the video released, and it appears that as a Chief Justice of the Supreme court you consider Annenberg to be a reputable organization, supporting the Constitution and you support their efforts. The problem with it, is that Annenberg has been employing on their Annenberg Challenge board William Ayers, a non-repentant terrorist that participated in bombing of police headquarters in 1970, Capitol building in 1971 and Pentagon in 1972. As late as 2001, Mr. Ayers stated in NY times interview: “I don’t regret setting bombs. I feel I didn’t do enough”. From 1995 the chairman of Annenberg Challenge was none else, but Mr. Barack Obama. Annenberg has created an offshoot, called Factcheck.org, Annenberg political Fact check, that was supposed to provide unbiased fact check. In reality Annenberg fact check has actively and intentionally defrauded American public in letting them to believe that Mr. Obama is a Natural born citizen and eligible for US presidency. Annenberg fact check intentionally omitted
Definition of Law of Nations (Emmerich De Vettel), stating that natural born citizen is one that is born in the country to parents, that are citizens. They omitted statement by John A Bingham, framer of the 14th amendment, stating that a natural born citizen is one that was born in the US territory to parents that don’t owe alliance to any other sovereignty. Due to the fact that Mr. Obama’s father was not a US citizen and owed allegiance to Kenya and Great Britain, Mr. Obama did not qualify as a natural born citizen and does not qualify for presidency. Fact check intentionally omitted Hawaii statue 338, that allows foreign born children of Hawaiian residence to obtain a Hawaiian certification of live birth It omitted the fact that such certification can be obtained based on a statement of one relative only without any corroborating evidence. It omitted the fact that there was no corroborating evidence of Mr. Obama’s birth from any hospital, nurse or hospital administrator from Hawaii, while there were numerous statements from Mr. Obama’s Kenyan grandmother, Baptist Bishop and ambassador of Kenya about Mr. Obama being born there. If that is the case, Mr. Obama is not a US citizen and will need to go back to Kenya to wait for his Green Card.
As of now American public has only information from Annenberg, a political organization, some of whose members have very questionable moral qualities (to say the least).
My clients, as well as 300 million American, including thousands of members of the military, that are asked to give their lives to defend the Constitution of this country, would like to know, if the Supreme Court Justices, particularly chief Justice Roberts, (that needs to swear the President on the bible), are willing to give a few hours of their time to hear the Oral Argument in defense of this Constitution. They want to know if the justices believe in the Constitution on which this country was built, whether they are prepared to tear it apart in favor of some new world order, conceived by a few billionaires, Trilateral commission and the Bielderberg Group.
Sincerely,
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
Council for the Petitioners
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
YouTube Channel, DrOrlyTV
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (application pending)
ping
bump
They want to know if the justices believe in the Constitution on which this country was built, whether they are prepared to tear it apart in favor of some new world order, conceived by a few billionaires, Trilateral commission and the Bielderberg Group.
:::::::::::
So far, the SCOTUS response to this issue has been totally counter to the law of the Constitution. I frankly don’t think the law matters anymore.
No BC, No peace.
Let’s all hope and PRAY!
Excellent letter.
Thanks for posting this, Calpernia.
Ping.
The Supremes need to get off their derelict duffs, and give Americans proof that Obama is a US citizen. The ball is in their court, because Obama has failed to do the right thing, not because others aren’t justified in requesting the truth.
I agree! Obama is not a “natural born citizen” until he proves that he is. I don’t believe that he can! It is the responsibility of the Supreme Court to require Obama to prove that he is a citizen.
http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244
So far, the SCOTUS response to this issue has been totally counter to the law of the Constitution. I frankly don’t think the law matters anymore.The Constitution specifically gives Congress the authority to manage the Electoral College and accept it's vote. The Supreme Court is given no role at all. I would hate for them to create a role out of whole cloth.
The Supremes need to get off their derelict duffs, and give Americans proof that Obama is a US citizen.The Constitution gives Congress, the most political branch of government, the responsibility to judge the qualifications of the president.
They were right to do this. Do you really want unelected, life tenured judges deciding who is qualified to be president? Also, the courts move very slowly and the founding fathers wanted to keep elections from being tied up forever.
We may not like the outcome of this election but the Supreme Court is following their Constitutional role.
The old 17th Amendment would have prevented this from happening. If our lawmakers were on a short leash you wetter believe they wouldn’t have let this clown get as far as he did.
Okay, play with it, and we will get a president who isn’t a US citizen. The cases are before the Supreme Court. The solution to this would take about ten minutes. Obama isn’t going to do it. Congress isn’t going to do it. What do you suggest, ...Let the Kenyan rule without having to prove his right to do it? The Supremes are hiding from something that has fallen into their laps. This is a simple matter. Take care of it.
So who do we look to as an example of how the rule of law should be followed? Surely as successful as our nation has been in following the rule of law, there would be at least one shining example of the law being followed instead of it being thwarted at such a critical time.
Well, yeah, that makes sense, doesn't it?
Unnecessary and inflammatory. Ms. Taitz would do well to just stick with the legalities of the matter.
... some of whose members have very questionable moral qualities (to say the least).
Again, unnecessary and inflammatory. Ms. Taitz would do well to just stick with the legalities of the matter.
They want to know if the justices believe in the Constitution on which this country was built, whether they are prepared to tear it apart in favor of some new world order, conceived by a few billionaires, Trilateral commission and the Bielderberg Group.
And, finally, Ms. Taitz all but accuses the Supreme Court of being part of a conspiracy, along with the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderbergers. This is no way to win friends or influence opinion.
I wish her and Alan Keyes nothing but good luck with their efforts. In light of this sort of communication, however, I'm down to pinning my hopes on Broe v. Reed in Washington. That case is laid out clearly and concisely, with none of the weird emotional outbursts and intemperate public statements that seem to have come to characterize so many others, from Berg to Donofrio and now this one.
The Constitution specifically gives Congress the authority to manage the Electoral College and accept it’s vote.
::::::::::
I was referring to the ELIGIBLE BIRTH ISSUE with Obama.
I agree.
I wish she would have stuck to the facts and left opinion and speculation out of the letter.
I doubt Keyes would have approved.
Even if one bought into that Bircher conspiracy stuff--to publicly hit the Chief Justice of the U.S. in the face with it is a sure formula for no action IMO...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.