Posted on 05/11/2009 4:38:08 PM PDT by Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears
Let’s admit the truth here. Miss California is being demonized for two reasons.
1) She is a professing, Bible-believing Christian, even though she is imperfect, as we all are.
2) She had the guts to say what most Americans agree with, and which has been demonstrated every single time it has been put to a vote, that marriage is to be only between a man and a woman.
The media and the militant pro-same-sex lobby now will try to destroy her, as they are doing right now. This is how they have always operated, and they will try to do so to any prominent person who opposes their agenda.
Does anyone with an IQ above room temperature and a shred of moral clarity honestly believe that if Carrie Prejean had caved to the thug Perez Hilton’s loaded questions, turned her back on her beliefs and told a lie that she believed in same-sex marriage, that she would be going through the scrutiny she is going through right now? Of course not. She would be celebrated by the liberal media as the most enlightened young woman in the world. And she may well be Miss USA.
When Perez Hilton, self-proclaimed “Queen of All Media” asked the loaded question, “Do you believe same-sex marriage should be legal in all 50 states?, “ one might have wrongly inferred that he was after an honest answer.
This is not the case. What he was really saying is, “I’ve got you trapped. There is no way you can answer this question without me using it to advance my personal agenda. I have an axe to grind. Now give me my sound bite or prepare to suffer my wrath.”
To further the hypocrisy, this is the same crowd that screams bloody murder that anyone would dare try to impose their beliefs on them.
As most know by now, while Miss California answered the question diplomatically, falteringly, and ultimately honestly, the hateful Hilton wasted no time in making a YouTube video in which he called her a “dumb b*tch” and later in an interview with MSNBC, said “I almost called her the c-word.” (Video link at bottom).
This is the level of imbecilic, junior high mudslinging that passes for reasonable discourse from the intolerant left.
Ironically, every time the issue of same-sex marriage has been put to a vote in any state, it has been defeated soundly by the majority of voters. Every. Single. Time. Even in California.
I wonder what kind of filthy epithets the half-wit Perez Hilton would sling at the majority? I’m sure he has some vile and juvenile things to say.
As Carrie Prejean has said in interviews since, it was more important to her to stand by her Christian faith than to win the contest. That is why her message faltered at first: because she was first going to take the coward’s way out and say what he wanted to hear, then she decided to tell the truth.
This is remarkable wisdom and courage she has shown. Not everyone has either the guts or the moral integrity it takes to do that. To say “Even if it costs me everything I put into winning this contest, I will not say something that is so at odds with what I truly believe.”
Personally, I would have very little respect for her if she did anything else. There was no other right thing to do.
She knows she did the right thing, and she has said as much.
Perez Hilton himself said he gave her a score of zero, not based on style, but because he was crushed and hurt by the answer she gave. He said he wanted to call her the c-word, and he wanted a miss USA that was inclusive.
The lesson he and his confederates would have us learn is “No matter what you really believe, you better agree with us publicly, or you will be sorry you didn’t.”
How much is Perez being demonized by the liberal media, for ambushing her with such a polarizing and devastating question? None.
You see, is the “offended party;” a poor, disenfranchised “victim” in a world where militant homosexual activists are both a protected and feared class, and anyone who stands up to them, even in such a sweet and diplomatic way as Miss Prejean, is to be steamrollered and annihilated.
So much for “tolerance” and “diversity,” huh?
To these mean-spirited activists, it is not enough that she not get Miss USA, her life must be made a living hell, to serve as a warning to anyone else who dares speak their unacceptable (albeit mainstream) thoughts.
Welcome to the new America.
I admire this young woman immensely, not only because of her class, but because she refused to betray her personal beliefs for a title from a dishonorable organization, which will be forgotten in a year.
For those unfamiliar with the smear merchant Perez Hilton, here’s a pretty good sample of his hatefulness:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbwC22d4sTU
BTW - Love your screen name...it’s so tolerant and Christian-like.
Got a question though, the Bible tell us God not only made us but loves all his children, even those who have strayed. So that means God made and loves Obama...with his large ears.
Why are you making fun of them? Isn’t that God’s creation?
I want to be a devout and tolerant Christian JUST LIKE YOU because you have become such an inspiration to me. Can you forward some instructional materials?
Perhaps, but it doesn’t make the reaction right. Besides, you never know how someone else may have answered.
I wouldn’t want my daughters to pose in underwear ads or strut around in front of a crowd in a bikini and high heels but that’s just me. Whether or not it is right for a Christian is not up to me. It just doesn’t fit my idea of a modest Christian woman, though. We were brought up to dress modestly. I know, times have changed and anything goes.
Incredibly tedious Bob. Bad day at the coal mines?
I’m getting tired of the excuses, rationalizations and “she may have fake boobs but they’re our fake boobs” from some calling themselves devout Christians. What’s so hard about saying “She shouldn’t have posed provacatively and getting a boob job is not in keeping with spirit of the Bible.”
Instead I see people turning back flips to justify her previous actions (which she hasn’t refuted nor mitigated) because she took a stand on abortion. IMO she is a confused young woman and should not be held up as an example of Christianity until she gets her issues worked out. It’ll only backfire, as we have seen up till now.
Situational ethics is not reserved exclusively for libs.
They haven’t changed that much.
you are funny
Let’s stand with Carrie Prejean! She’s starting another movement against the homosexual community.
I do not know. How tall are you?
Of course to your small, ill-informed mind, you think a person must be flawless before they can identified as a Christian.
You are exposing your colossal ignorance for all to see.
And your objection to Miss Prejean’s figure... is it because you are playing on the “same team” as Perez Hilton? LOL
Admit it.
The only reason homosexuals hate heterosexuals is because they cannot do what heterosexuals can do.
Reproduce!
Homosexuals have to use lies to push their agenda. Because of this heterosexual backbone to speak her mind the homosexuals now want to destroy her.
The homosexual that threatened violence against this person for exercising her right to free speech should be brought up on charges. That is a hate crime.
You are so right.
I knew a gay man who used the term “breeders” to contemptuously refer to heterosexuals. He said this is a common term in the “community.”
NBC, improperly or nonreporting the news, stated they could not put the photos on the air, yet FOX did. I was not offended, but felt sorry for the young woman who did not recognize the number of perverts and perverted entities that exist in our society. I believe the photos were on thedirty.com (or GOOGLE it).
My advice to people who are passionate about being against gay marriage: Don't let your credibility be dragged down with this particular spokesbabe. She's just a prop in a play by the master showman Donald Trump.
I have to say, as crackpot theories go, yours is very creative. :-)))
Kudos.
Crackpot? Here we have the spectacle of a formerly-nobody, limp wristed feather duster becoming "famous" as a champion of homosexual rights, by having been spoon-fed information as to which made-up, fake-boobed, inarticulate bimbo would be most likely to give him the sputtering answer he required, by one of the most brazen self-promoters in the history of the world. And all of a sudden, the "leader" of the conservative opinion on the question of gay marriage is someone who is revealed to be a liar, dating a bad boy, and posing for pictures we'd be embarassed to see our daughters in, all while participating in a festival of plausible-deniability virginity that seems to have disagreed on her Creator's first draft of her body. I couldn't think of any way to better discredit a political position.
Anything inaccurate about what I've said there?
Oh, it’s a spectacle for sure. But pre-planned? No way.
Is it being capitalized on? Absolutely. What did you expect?
"You are exposing your colossal ignorance for all to see."
Thank you.
"And your objection to Miss Prejean’s figure... is it because you are playing on the “same team” as Perez Hilton? LOL. Admit it."
Dude, why the fixation on homo themes? Anytime someone bests you in an argument you get confused and immediately reach directly for the anal sex jokes.
Methinks you might have some confusion about yourself.
I'll admit, The Donald had no way of knowing that Carrie would be selected from California. But in a field of fifty young women, it's not hard to figure out that at least one of them would be from an evangelical background. And I'll admit that while I have no evidence that Trump fed the poofter the information, it really wouldn't have been that hard for him to figure it out on his own.
But, Trump clearly picked Mr. "Look at Me, Look at Me" to judge this contest, with no obvious qualifications to do so. It wouldn't have been too hard for one of Trump's lackeys to have figured out which flamer would have provided the best fireworks.
And why was it that the attention whore was enabled to ask the inarticulate (I'm still trying to figure out why she called it 'opposite marriage') woman with the pageant-paid-for boob job a question that a Miss-Anything has zero influence on, we'll never know. But today, The Donald gets to look magnanamous, and have his name mentioned in the "entertainment" news once again for having been so. It wouldn't surprise me that he had some influence on who got to ask questions to who.
Yes, I did expect it. I also expect that conservatives are too smart to play into it.
Yeah, what irks me most about this (aside from the obvious) is just what you said.
Trump gets to play Mr Magnanimous, drag out his Royal Decision a few days, and laugh his way to the bank.
But really I don’t blame him.... If I was PT Barnum, I’d do the same.
No, what ticks me off is how the real perp goes unscathed.
Fortunately, mainstream America is getting an eyefull, and they can’t like what they see.
The poofter has done his movement no favors. But I suspect he is in it for nothing but himself either, I doubt very seriously he is itchin to get married.
:-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.