Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Wow! If this is not confirmation that there is something very, very wrong here. What are they hiding? They are not even filing the rules of the court. It is as if Judge Carter never existed and this new judge just appears. Chilling!
1 posted on 08/18/2009 9:15:08 AM PDT by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: GilGil

Anyone who has the ability to form logical thoughts should realize by now Obama is a fraud.


2 posted on 08/18/2009 9:19:08 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GilGil

“FREE THE LONG FORM!”


3 posted on 08/18/2009 9:19:19 AM PDT by Dryman (Now, Back to Lurking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GilGil

And where is Judge Carter on this? Did he object? How and why did the replacement come about? Did he not want to go any further and so they simply stuck in someone not afraid to break the rules in order to get rid of the case?

Can people contact Carter about this?


4 posted on 08/18/2009 9:21:52 AM PDT by Kandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GilGil

Is the 2nd judge trying to deny Due Process in this case?

Big BS flag here if true.


5 posted on 08/18/2009 9:22:12 AM PDT by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GilGil
Who was it that said “soap box, ballot box, jury box, cartridge box and when was it said? Anyone know?
9 posted on 08/18/2009 9:33:40 AM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GilGil; All
ok... for some reason, when i go to that link, my trend micro recognizes the site as a "reported attack site"

anyone?


10 posted on 08/18/2009 9:34:34 AM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GilGil

What have we learned here? The law may or may not have been followed.

Lawyers write the law, lawyers enact it, lawyers argue it, and lawyers decide it, and if you DARE to understand it, lawyers change it!! Your job is to bow down and accept it, quivering with awe at the amazing job the lawyers are doing. Oh, and pay them their fees while you’re at it. Big fees.


19 posted on 08/18/2009 9:58:12 AM PDT by I am Richard Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GilGil; Kandy; BP2
It appears that a judge Nakazato is attempting to steal this case from the original judge Carter without even following the procedural filings to do so.

Orly is once again showing that she doesn't have the faintest clue about litigating in federal court. Every federal case is assigned, immediately on filing, to both a District Judge and a Magistrate Judge. If you look at any document in this case, it will have on it the case number, which is SACV09-00082-DOC (Anx). The "DOC" means the case is assigned to District Judge David O. Carter, and the "Anx" means it was assigned to Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato ("x" being the code for "magistrate").

Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which Orly has apparently never read, District Judges decide "dispositive motions" (motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment), but Magistrate Judges decide discovery motions. Orly's motion was one for discovery, so it was required to go to Magistrate Judge Nakazato.

Orly's failure to understand the most basic rules of federal practice show that she is a professional embarassment. Her claim that this is some sort of plot against her shows that she is paranoid.

27 posted on 08/18/2009 10:38:35 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GilGil

This magistrate Judge might have them come in and attempt to learn whether they can settle.... before it actually goes to court.


28 posted on 08/18/2009 11:04:39 AM PDT by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GilGil
This woman is insane and dangerous to conservatives. I don't know why people put so much faith into her. That, and her site is constantly infested with Chinese malware ought to start sending off some alarm bells.

Yes another exploit is hosted on her site, again opening a 1x1 "hidden" iframe to a Chinese exploit site.

34 posted on 08/18/2009 11:52:06 PM PDT by John Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson