I would settle for the truth - nothing but the truth.
POINT OF VIEW??? oh - SPIN!!!
I thought from the title this was expert Couric saying people wanted Health Care coverage that has a POV. Which would be REALLY only just as stupid as what she did in fact say.
How’s that point of view reporting working out for you Katie?
Still in last place and sinking like a stone?
Katie is such a deep thinker.
she is so contemptible. why doesn’t she tell young reporters
how you really get a start, the way she did, by dating
the boss who was engaged, then married to another woman.
ask former cnn anchor, denise leclair, how she feels about
katie’s start in news.
Nice to see her tacitly admitting finally that her "news" isn't objective, though.
Piece of Vomit
This may well be true. But, based on the viewership it seems safe to say that people do NOT want coverage with her point of view.
Gee, I missed her Ph.D. By what right does this sub-intellect lecture any American about anything? 15 Million a year for reading fluff and lies off a DNC teleprompter? I’m lost here. How do these cretins get elevated to such status? And by and by,...WOULD NOT HIT IT!
Katie, Katie, Katie. . .people want unbiased coverage. If they can't have that, they will settle for hearing opposing points of view so they can make their own decisions about what to believe. They certainly don't want to be force-fed your brand of leftist drivel.
Yeah, that’s why all the evening news programs and liberal papers are doing so well.....
katie does not even know what day it is... as dumb as the totus.
LLS
Better yet, the “coverage” of ObamaCare and its ephemeral ‘substance’ would be better served by just presenting the ‘facts’ about it, which are and always have been
elusive if not non-existent.The reality is that it was presented in one form as an over 2000 page monolith, which was intended to MAKE it unreadable, in case anyone dared to get caught in its quicksand. Lacking a bill (”OF PARTICULARS”,so to speak) anyone has read, or understood, lacking anything really concrete to talk about,(but WHEN talked about, as when the subject of death panels was brought up, THAT feature was denied up, down and sideways) there is nothing left EXCEPT a Point of View dragged out and applied to an Abstraction, which seems to be there ONLY for the purpose of creating and re-creating a flow of rhetoric between supporters and detractors.
Other than that, there really IS and never HAS BEEN a HealthCare bill, though they could always point to this massive MONUMENT IN PAPER , this Sphinx,that existed merely
to be talked AROUND, not ABOUT. For that reason alone , it should have been rejected OUT OF HAND, MONTHS AGO. But our idiot politicians seemed to think it needed to be discussed
‘on its own terms’, whatever those were.
O’Reilly has a POV and does not pretend to be e newscaster..number 1 ratings on TV. Couic has a POV and tries poorly to sell that as objective reporting... ratings in the toilet. TV audiences vote with their remotes and are turning off Couric and the rest of the MSM for a reason.
To show how much media types like Couric skew leftwards, some years ago somebody asked Dan Rather where he thought the N.Y. Times political sensibilities lay. He replied “straight down the middle.” Any person who couldn’t recognize the fact that the Slimes was tilted severly leftwards was either lying or too stupid to be allowed near a tv camera.
News with a POV, is news with an Agenda, which is called Marketing.
Now quit pretending to be objective.
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
Yeah! The role they still have to do is to ask the tough questions of Obama and his crew just like they did to Sarah!
Yeah, that “point of view” is FAR more important than the TRUTH!!