Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Napolitano Investigating Pro-Lifers, not Terrorists!
ConservativeAmerican.org ^ | 2/9/10 | Peter Andrew

Posted on 02/09/2010 12:40:30 PM PST by Peter Andrew Conservative

In keeping with Barack Obama’s administration position that pro-lifers are “radical right wing extremists” or “Right wing domestic terrorists,” Janet Napolitano is spending time investigating pro-lifers in Wisconsin instead of underwear bombers over Detroit!!!

This is pure insanity

Homeland Security improperly conducted a threat assessment of Wisconsin pro- and anti-abortion rights groups before an expected rally last year. The department said in a memo released last year that it destroyed or deleted all of the copies of the assessment after an internal review found it violated intelligence gathering guidelines about “protest groups which posed no threat to homeland security.”

(Excerpt) Read more at conservativeamerican.org ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Local News; Politics
KEYWORDS: 1984; agenda; bho44; bhodhs; bigbrother; homelandsecurity; napolitano; orwelliannightmare; policestate; prolife; terrorist

1 posted on 02/09/2010 12:40:31 PM PST by Peter Andrew Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Peter Andrew Conservative
Isn't there ANY Patriots at Homeland Security who cold have blown the whistle on this?

Or are they filled with ‘fellow travelers’

2 posted on 02/09/2010 12:50:09 PM PST by Mr. K (This administration IS WEARING OUT MY CAPSLOCK KEY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peter Andrew Conservative

Here is the memo that Napolitano/DHS hurried to get out immediately after obama took office.....they dropped it like a hot potato.....I’m guessing that the current story is more redux of just what went on in earliest 2009

http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf


3 posted on 02/09/2010 12:50:18 PM PST by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peter Andrew Conservative

I thought destroying a government document after it had been generated was against the law. After all,the people paid for the information on that document. IF IT IS SO SENSITIVE, IT SHOULD BE CLASSIFIED SECRET BUT STILL NOT DESTROYED.

The nerve of these Chicago thugs, It ticks me off.

.....Bob


4 posted on 02/09/2010 12:50:44 PM PST by Lokibob (When handed lemons...Refuse to sign for them. Life's lemons can't be delivered without a signature.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

They are Federal Employees — America’s Haitians — you can’t have expectations of anything but misery, incompetence and failure from them, yet from you they expect large entitlements.


5 posted on 02/09/2010 12:53:40 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Peter Andrew Conservative

Apparently people who DON’t want to kill babies are terrorists to Janet ‘From Another Planet’ Napolitno


6 posted on 02/09/2010 12:58:16 PM PST by Mr. K (This administration IS WEARING OUT MY CAPSLOCK KEY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peter Andrew Conservative
Homeland Security improperly conducted a threat assessment of Wisconsin pro- and anti-abortion rights groups before an expected rally last year. The department said in a memo released last year that it destroyed or deleted all of the copies of the assessment after an internal review found it violated intelligence gathering guidelines about “protest groups which posed no threat to homeland security.”

Destruction of the evidence was a coverup. Someone needs to spend some prison time over this.

7 posted on 02/09/2010 1:01:42 PM PST by a fool in paradise ("like it or not, we have to have a financial system that is healthy and functioning" Obama 2/4/2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
IF IT IS SO SENSITIVE, IT SHOULD BE CLASSIFIED SECRET BUT STILL NOT DESTROYED.

I do not believe it was 'destroyed'.

Reclassified. Hidden under a different title.

But not destroyed.

8 posted on 02/09/2010 1:01:47 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
The department said in a memo released last year that it destroyed or deleted all of the copies of the assessment

First off, these people are professional liars. That is an established fact. What makes you think they wouldn't lie about destroying it?

What makes you think they did not keep it, and are still using it?

9 posted on 02/09/2010 1:06:36 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Peter Andrew Conservative
...it violated intelligence gathering guidelines about “protest groups which posed no threat to homeland security.”

That is a laugh. While technically true, Homeland Security is involved (improperly) in a number of avenues that carry no threat to homeland security:

Big Media Meets Law Enforcement at White House; Biden Announces Focus on Intellectual Property Theft (BroadbandandBreakfast ^ | December 16th, 2009 | Andrew Feinberg and Eli Evans )

The U.S. is committed to an inter-agency process for combating piracy of American intellectual property, Vice President Joseph Biden said Tuesday during a press availability with top law enforcement officials.

Appearing at the White House complex with U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, Secretary of Commerce Gary Locke, Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano, the directors of the FBI, Customs and Border Protection, and the United States Secret Service, as well as the chief executives of the nation’s largest entertainment companies.

The meeting was followed by a closed-door, roundtable discussion on international intellectual property theft.


10 posted on 02/09/2010 1:09:12 PM PST by a fool in paradise ("like it or not, we have to have a financial system that is healthy and functioning" Obama 2/4/2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peter Andrew Conservative

not surprising, since their first assessment under the 0bama administration listed the pro-life movement, and returning war veterans as possible “right wing terrorists or extremists.”


11 posted on 02/09/2010 1:13:11 PM PST by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peter Andrew Conservative

Makes sense.
Pro-Life is dangerous to the Democrat agenda. Terrorists only endanger American lives. We know which is more important to the Obama administration, right?


12 posted on 02/09/2010 1:13:15 PM PST by Little Ray (Madame President sounds really good to me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peter Andrew Conservative

Now I know why I call them Loony Liberal Leftists (L^3)!

-Jack


13 posted on 02/09/2010 1:19:08 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peter Andrew Conservative

Anyone who disagrees with a Leftists is considered an enemy of the state.


14 posted on 02/09/2010 1:20:23 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Not destroyed? You must be reading a different article than I did:
“The department said in a memo released last year that it destroyed or deleted all of the copies of the assessment after an internal review found it violated intelligence gathering guidelines about “protest groups which posed no threat to homeland security.””

.....Bob


15 posted on 02/09/2010 1:25:48 PM PST by Lokibob (When handed lemons...Refuse to sign for them. Life's lemons can't be delivered without a signature.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
More incompetence from Nitwit Incompetano. It should be renamed Ho-Land Insecurity while she's large and in charge of the department. Is there anybody in this administration who isn't corrupt, perverted, stupid, socialist or a political hack?
16 posted on 02/09/2010 2:06:10 PM PST by peeps36 (Democrats Don't Need No Stinking Input From You Little People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
Not destroyed? You must be reading a different article than I did:

No, same article.

However, can you positively identify the person whose name is 'The Department'?

Can you hold that person accountable?

Do you think that a government agency would not LIE to you, or the media?

Do you think the media would purposefully print what they know to be a lie?

"THE DEPARTMENT" issued a memo to the media stating they 'destroyed' the document(s).

What gives you the slightest reason to even believe that?

17 posted on 02/09/2010 2:17:46 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson