Makes the case for voting for Jennifer -- even if you love Bristol.
1 posted on
11/22/2010 9:07:48 AM PST by
CMoran325
To: CMoran325
>> Makes the case for voting for Jennifer
No, it makes the case for voting for whomever you prefer to win — but voting only ONCE.
Isn’t that what voting should be all about?
2 posted on
11/22/2010 9:11:52 AM PST by
Nervous Tick
(Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
To: CMoran325
As yourself "what would Obama do?" and do the opposite.
3 posted on
11/22/2010 9:15:21 AM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(The people who hate Sarah Palin hate her because they know that her Presidency is inevitable.)
To: CMoran325
I can’t believe there are that many people who will establish dozens of email addresses so they can vote multiple times over as unimportant a thing as a tv game show.
It would take an enormous amount of time. It simply wouldn’t be worth it.
Maybe there a few such nuts out there, but I’m betting there aren’t that many at all.
4 posted on
11/22/2010 9:16:56 AM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain & proud of it: Truly Supporting the Troops means praying for their Victory!)
To: CMoran325
The host of the show, Tom Bergeron, said after Brandy lost her chance to win, "This is why you need to vote." As if he were begging for more "real" people to vote. Or something like that.
I never vote. I just like the dancing. But, I am concerned about the backlash against Bristol.
5 posted on
11/22/2010 9:19:12 AM PST by
Slyfox
To: CMoran325
Liberals care about voter fraud when it “might” be happening with a TV show. In real life situations they send out black panther goons... and pretend it’s nothing.
6 posted on
11/22/2010 9:25:01 AM PST by
GOPJ
('Power abdicates only under the stress of counter-power." Martin Buber /a Tea-nami's coming..)
To: CMoran325
Again...bonified Ballroom dancing contests are not left up to the whims of the general public.
The mere establishment of SEPARATE phone lines for each contestant, with a simultaneous multiple voting capability over other carriers like internet and texting, there is no way that DWTS could be classified as anything other than a "popularity" contest.
The judges are there for show, hoping to influence call-ins in their direction of preference, but in the end, it's the call-ins that decide it. Given that millions of voters are NOT professional ballroom dancing judges, all that's left is popularity.
Secondly, if it was just a "dancing contest", then all of the contestants would be professional ballroom dancers...but they are not. Professional dancers team up with a star/celbrity; the star/celebrity aspect is why people watch - normally pure ballroom dancing doesn't commandere much of an audience on national TV.
It's all about voting for a star...a personality; watching them dance is the entertainment, and the backstage footage is the drama.
I don't know what will happen tonight, but there is probably some sort of "fix" in so that Bristol will not get the final championship. If she does, I'm sure that Jennifer Gray, the Judges, and a few million liberals' heads will expode in unison, and the liberal press will have something else to piss and moan about.
9 posted on
11/22/2010 9:53:44 AM PST by
FrankR
(Don't let the bastards wear you down!)
To: CMoran325
The question I posed to my wife yesterday as we were discussing this issue was this:
“If it were Chelsea Clinton who was getting this apparently unnecessary push instead of Bristol Palin, would the media be so up in arms?”
As non-political as my wife is, even she had to admit that the hoo-hah is almost entirely driven by the who and not the what of the situation.
13 posted on
11/22/2010 12:17:08 PM PST by
ssaftler
("Politically Correct" is neither!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson