Posted on 12/11/2010 6:14:53 PM PST by Allegra
Today, some of the Pimpbusters held a social event at Blogger Overlord Central Command (BOCC.)
One of the topics discussed (and tested) was new and innovative techniques for Blogpimp Deterrent Systems (BPDS).
Please see the video here.
Excerpt. Read more at Just kidding! No excerpt! We're not blogpimps.
I’d love to see a picture of the yard prior to clean up.
We kind of have a pool going.
Oh, and are you funded by George Soros?
Does he pay well?
Including the ice chest pieces in the trees.
Here is the crux of the problem.
A) You don't do so very well.
B) You don't do so very clearly.
C) You are a n00bie.
D) You lecture on that which you do not understand.
E) Your lack of logic is indicative of a weak mind.
The good news is that you will not last long around here. See ya 'lil feller.
Wierd group you’ve got here. Carry on.
Food for thought:
Excerpting protects against lawsuits.
Not excerpting leads to lawsuits.
Yes, stick your little puppy tail between your legs and run from the real Conservatives.
Can’t say anybody’s going to miss you.
Some weaselly little blogger writes a few paragraphs
on his blog and then posts it here. In a fit of pique
he gets angry about it sues himself? I can picture that.
Real conservatives whine about excerpting. It’s like Reagan said . . . “Don’t excerpt in Free Republic. It may bring on lawsuits but clicking through is such a chore.”
You can’t picture rights to sue being sold to someone? I can.
LOL!
Thanks for posting the pics. It looks like you all sure had fun! :)
You can’t picture rights not to bright posters thinking that excerpting is wrong because you complain about it and putting in full articles from sources that can be excerpted? I can.
It’s really foolish what you are doing. A waste or your time and everyone elses.
Let me rephrase that:
You can’t picture not too bright posters thinking that excerpting is wrong because you, humblegunner, complain about it constantly and those not too bright posters put in full articles from sources that should be excerpted? I can.
It’s really foolish what you are doing. A waste of your time and everyone elses.
You're just jealous. ;-)
Carry on.
Oh, we will. With or without your permission.
That must have been professionally written so why wasn’t it excerpted and attributed?
;<)
Really stuff!
I can't picture you composing a cogent sentence.
Bloggers excerpting their own material in order to
drive traffic (and hits) to their own blogs is scummy.
Free Republic is nobody's free advertising platform.
I'm done trying to explain this to you. If you dislike
posts which are critical of blogpimps, I suggest that you
print them out, fold them up and stick them up your tootie hole.
Then you won't have to read them.
You really don't have to be all that bright to obtain the list of sources that require excerpting on FR.
Brighter than you, apparently, but not all that bright, really.
No conservative blogs allowed to be excerpted? Or just some? We going to have a list of must be excerpted, can’t be posted, or must not be excerpted at all? Bunch of old ladies here complaining about the neighbor’s yard and what Joe wears to church on Sunday.
Get a real, sensible policy after consulting with a lawyer and quit wasting everyone’s time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.