Posted on 04/27/2011 12:56:09 PM PDT by SquarePants
One day soon we'll look back on April 27, 2011 as an important day. Right now liberals think we'll remember it as the day that Obama put the lie to the birthers, but they're wrong. I think we'll remember it as the day Obama's presidency died.
Right now, Obama and the left, along with their lapdogs in the MSM, think they've outsmarted the birthers, and that they've engaged in a brilliant game of political brinksmanship. They're thinking that the birthers have shown themselves to be the fruits and nuts of the right, and they made all this hubbub about what was, after all, nothing really. Just a document... like any other American birth certificate.
They're wrong. For two reasons...
(Excerpt) Read more at rightwire.net ...
Sorry, but if you post incorrect information then I will comment if I want. You can always ignore me if you desire.
That said, let's accept this latest document, and take his word. He is born of a non citizen and there is nothing American about him.
And let's accept that you showed up a couple weeks ago and have have posted nothing except to defend him. That smells like troll, but hey, you got a hall pass, so use it.
Oh, and you can call me a birther, but I have not obsessed on this, I just want to see documentation about who he claims to be. That seemed reasonable when the MSM obsessed over GWB bonifieds.
“According to the White House it had been destroyed in a fire in Hawaii, and then Governor Abercrombie said his search for it in the public database came up empty... and now it pops up on Monday morning TV in an official press release from the White House. Where did it come from, and where was it when the White House said it had been destroyed?”
After claiming his birth certificate was already released and he couldn’t walk around with it plastered on his forehead, he now releases this? He spent $2M fighting the release of this? Why?
I’m also disgusted he calls Americans’ concerns “silly.” What an inconsiderate arrogant man.
Anyway, this is a first step. There are other questions to answer now, like why does he have multiple social security numbers, what happened to his US citizenship when he became an Indonesian citizen, how he became a foreign student while attending college in the USA and how he traveled to countries like Pakistan. Today’s release only makes the other questions more pressing.
You certainly do what you can to make FR an unfriendly, uninviting place. Fortunately most posters are good, decent people. There will always be exceptions.
Were you a hall monitor when you were in school? Did you enjoy that sense of power?
I don’t give a rats ass what you think of me - if you don’t like what I have to say then simply ignore me.
You are the one making baseless accusations in order to get me banned. Have you considered what a crappy role model you are?
This is becoming harassment. Are you trying to get ME banned? Otherwise, why are you harassing me?
You are kind of thick aren't you? I told you I don't cry to the mods, they do fine without my help. And I already said I think you are a troll. That is my take on noobs who spend all day defending 0bozo here. I am not a mod or Jim Rob so that ain't my call. I don't have a problem with that.
So why the continued obsession? Just let it go and ignore me. If you like, I will do the same to you. Deal?
I agree. Unless opposing legal PROOF arises, the matter is done. HI provided a certified legal copy of the original BC; there is nothing else to be done. The challenge has been met, and will not be undone by rantings of idiots on biased websites (so far today I have seen an embarrassing number of idiotic comments made).
The issue now is not absence or forgery, but outright eligibility in a matter few will care about.
Wasn’t it wrong to make soldiers wear UN hats and arm bands?
He should have really busted on this at the time.
Wasn’t it wrong to make soldiers wear UN hats and arm bands?
He should have really busted on this at the time.
No one really commented on it.
No one really commented on it.
Does this have something to do with my comment about Lakin at #30 ? Or did you just want to ask me a different question?
Ahh, the old guilt by association trick.
Expand on your criticism of Polarik’s work, and please be specific in your criticism.
It’s easy to throw brickbats.
But during the primary elections, none of Obama's opponents claimed that that made him ineligible to run. During the general election campaign, McCain and Palin never claimed that that made Obama ineligible. During that campaign, no conservative legal organization (Thomas Moore Center, ACLJ, Judicial Watch, etc.) ever filed a challenge to Obama's eligibility. No law professor wrote an op-ed article questioning Obama's eligibility.
False statements. Dr. Alan Keyes, for just one example, objected and filed lawsuits.
After the election, no member of the electoral college questioned Obama's eligibility. When Vice President Cheney certified the electoral votes before a joint session of Congress, not one member of the House or Senate raised any objection to Obama's eligibility. Chief Justice Roberts swore Obama into office without questioning his eligibility.
False statement. One or more Electors tried to object, but Vice President Cheney breached procedure by omitting the roll call vote of the Electors where such an objection would have been heard. At least one such Elector became a party to a lawsuit/s which the courts dismissed without trial on the basis the Elector and other plaintiffs lacked standing. The Senate's Democrat majority will not investigate, since they are accomplices to the fraudulent election in the first place.
In the past, we elected a Vice President, Spiro Agnew (the VP is required by the Constitution to have the same qualifications as the President), whose father wasn't a citizen. No one at the time claimed that he wasn't qualified to hold office.
That is another false statement, and it is a lie, because it has been refuted with U.S. Census records and the Selective Service record of the father right here in Free Republic. The Selective Service record of the father clearly reports the father was a naturalized U.S. citizen before the birth of the son. You should retract the false statement.
At this point, the odds of any court in the U.S. defining "natural born citizen" to mean anything but a citizen who is born, not naturalized, is exactly zero.
You'll understand then why we reject your opinion and your comments as being false and unreliable.
Sorry, I got re-tread’s name wrong. Someone told me they thought he was jamese.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.