Posted on 11/02/2011 5:16:58 AM PDT by Concerned
IMPOSSIBLE NUMBER ---> Obama's purported #10641 LFBC is at least 741 numbers too late!!
{yawn} Got anything new?
If that is correct, then there is a very real possibility that those BCs were ALSO forged, to give purportedly impartial, third-party credibility, cover for Obama.
And NO, a SEVERAL HUNDRED NUMBER DISCREPANCY---on BCs FROM the SAME HOSPITAL ---purportedly 19 DAYS ***LATER***---is NOT "OLD" news!
““Birther” stuff. Apparently someone thinks they’ve proven Obama’s birth certificate number is wrong.”
That’s ok.... More than half here seem to be satisfied with both of Hussein’s staff’s photoshopped birth certificates, so all is still good, right?
FOUR MORE YEARS! /s
Do you honestly think Kapiolani had SEVERAL different labor and delivery departments?
Do you honestly think the person whose **JOB** it was to ensure BCs were **BATES STAMPED**---i.e. SEQUENTIALLY---would ***STAMP THE BATES STAMPER*** SEVERAL HUNDRED TIMES to stamp "Obama's" purported 08/04/1961 LFBC, then UNDO the BATES STAMPER and run it BACK to 09XXX to continue on?
Really?
***BATES STAMPS*** are SEQUENTIAL!!! You can't "pre-print" a BATES STAMP numbered document!
Hint: That's WHY they are **BATES STAMPED**!!!
We are now working on a practical way to get Obama out of office at the moment.
Your "news" ain't "news".
Am I logged in? Can somebody help me, I can’t post repies ...
/sarcasm
You are not alone.
You do realize not all babies end up getting born in an official birthing center. Or do you?!?!?!? We had an American Indian woman in this neighborhood who had several children born at home all by herself.
She was a certified motorcycle mechanic as well.
Any birth certificate information would have been gathered by the fire department
He’s toast because of a prolonged doomed economy, not some technicality.
Please speak for yourself. I care deeply about Presidential Fraud.
ML/NJ
Unless you know the exact process used to document births and assign/stamp the numbers on the forms, logic dictates no such thing. There are several plausible explanations for the supposed discrepancy of the BC number.
It was sarcastic. But, besides a few of us, nobody cares and they make fun of us on FR. Presidential Fraud seems to be off the table.
Welcome to 2008.
The stupid it burns...
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=363025
Arpaio needs to go after HI DOH with a criminal case related subpoena or warrant from an AZ judge. No more civil fishing expeditions that will be blocked/quashed, please.
As usual the left has won the narrative. We are so lazy we never do the simple research!! Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen. His father was Kenyan! The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.
Based on the information now known we have this:
Nameless WND certificate – 09945 (or 099XX) – 8/23/1961
Nordyke, Susan – 10637 – 8/5/1961
Nordyke, Gretchen – 10638- 8/5/1961
Obama, Barack – 10641- 8/4/1961
Waidelich, Stig – 10920- 8/5/1961
Based on the pattern of the limited info available it can be hypothesized that Hawaii organized their BC’s alphabetically or by some other criteria, possibly at the end of every month, and then assigned the numbers. Knowing the name on this BC would help clarify this.
Based on the Hawaiian records of the time there were something on the order of 300 births a week, I think. Don't take that number to the bank, check it before you repeat it. But if this is correct, you'd expect around 1,200 BC’s a month. This spread would cover the gap well if this person's name is low on the alphabet.
And Polarik or “Doctor” Ronald J Pollard is an Internet crank who appears to enjoy screwing with people to see what he can make them believe.
He's fully aware of this information but makes these videos anyway. Take that for what you will.
Presume for the sake of argument that your information is unassailable and proof beyond all reasonable doubt...
What are you, or anyone else, going to do about it? From the Supreme court on down to congress to *anyone* else — no one in any position of authority has shown the least bit of interest in pursuing anything regarding Obama’s birth status.
About the best you can hope for is to annotate future history books and put an asterisk next to Obama’s entry. And that’s not even a sure thing. Unfortunately.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.