Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich: Talkin' TWO DOLLAR Gasoline
Reaganite Republican ^ | February 14, 2011 | Reaganite Republican

Posted on 02/14/2012 5:33:18 AM PST by Reaganite Republican


Newt Gingrich spoke at a Los Angeles fundraiser yesterday, where the focus was 'bringing down the price of gas', always a lively topic out there in ten-lane-freeway land.

Key to the market-based Gingrich energy strategy would be accelerated domestic oil exploration: 'We know how to get gasoline prices back down: produce more gas' said the Former House Speaker. 

'Join us in a campaign to drill here, drill now, pay less and let’s get back to $2 a gallon gasoline with Gingrich, not $5 a gallon gasoline with Obama.'

Typically, the ideas Newt puts-forth are simple and straightforward... just common-sense, really:

Gingrich Energy Plan

  1. Remove bureaucratic and legal obstacles to responsible oil and natural gas development in the United States, offshore and on land.
  2. End the ban on oil shale development in the American West, where we have three times the amount of oil as Saudi Arabia.
  3. Give coastal states federal royalty revenue sharing to give them an incentive to allow offshore development.
  4. Reduce frivolous lawsuits that hold up energy production by enacting loser pays laws to force the losers in an environmental lawsuit to pay all legal costs for the other side.
  5. Finance cleaner energy research and projects with new oil and gas royalties.
  6. Replace the Environmental Protection Agencywhich has become a job-killing regulatory engine of higher energy prices, with an Environmental Solutions Agency that would use incentives and work cooperatively with local government and industry to achieve better environmental outcomes while considering the impact of federal environmental policies on job creation and the cost of energy.


Sadly, the warped 'progressive' movement has beaten our oil industry to the ground at every opportunity for over three years now... and for what? Four-to-five dollar a gallon gas still hasn't got anybody buying Chevy Volts, you idiots... they're just spending less money everywhere else in the economy while they rumble -and grumble- down the road in their V-8 Grand Cherokee.

In LA yesterday Newt also repeated his previously-stated intention to dismantle the EPA and replace it with a structure that actually takes into account the interests US industry, energy producers, and consumers (for a change)... more of that 'common sense' we were just talking about, and how refreshing indeed it would be to have a president who knows what country he's supposed to be helping.


So,  the average US motorist drives about 15,000 miles a year, and the national average gas price right now is $4.09. If your car gets 20 mpg, that's over $3000 annual fuel cost.



That means that a fulfillment of Gingrich's $2.00 gasoline pledge would save the average driver an easy $1500/year ($125/mo CASH in your pocket every month). Hey, do your own math at over $2.00 savings per gallon... for some of you lead-foots this will amount to a small fortune. Ya think that kind of (ongoing) savings might help the country's crippled economy?


Note that this (free) improvement in ALL our standards-of-living will be provided courtesy of the American free-market capitalist system (not still-more gub'ment cheese), as the supply side of the US energy industry is revitalized with an energy program that strengthens and enriches this country... not constrains and impoverishes, as the lunatic Obama regime has done 
-and is doing- to us.


It can happen again...

Meanwhile out there at the front, it's still Newt Gingrich
-not Ricky 19-Point-Shellacking Santorum-

who's got Mittens and BHO still looking over their shoulder...

LATimes   Newt2012   NYT   Maggie's Notebook
Starting a RR ping list for any interstested, pls FReepmail @ Reaganite Republican... TIA!


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: energy; gasoline; gingrich; newt

1 posted on 02/14/2012 5:33:23 AM PST by Reaganite Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

$2.00????

Didn’t Bachmann promise $1.80 gasoline?

This kind of pandering goes nowhere, as no one really believes it.

==

If prices rise too much, look for Obama to pull a Clinton and release oil from the Strategic Oil Reserve to lower prices — in time for the November election.


2 posted on 02/14/2012 5:49:18 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

Production goes up > prices go down > millions more people in China and India can buy gas > demand goes up > prices go up.

And how does Newt plan to prevent OPEC from regulating production to keep price where they want them?

I am in favor of increased production for economic security reasons. But it is foolish to think a US president can control the price of global commodities - there are too many factors beyond his control. This is political pandering.


3 posted on 02/14/2012 5:49:45 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

The only problem is we are Producing far more Gasoline than we are using, in fact we are experiencing the Highest percentage of Refined Motor Fuels being exported to other countries than ever before. So cheap Gas is not the problem, we already have too much. The problem is Government and the Fed STEALING THE VALUE OF YOUR ASSETS AND MONEY thru Inflation and Regulation. And since there is virtually No Manufacturing in this country anymore, we really do not need the fuel to go back and forth to work, now there could be a case made to ease the price of Fuel in an effort to make it easier to go to the Government Buildings to get Food Stamps, Housing Vouchers, Cell Phones, Cash Aid, and Welfare Checks, but that is all.


4 posted on 02/14/2012 5:49:58 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

When he entered office it was 1.80 per and then he closed down the Gulf.

Pray for America


5 posted on 02/14/2012 5:59:20 AM PST by bray (More Batting Practice for the Bambino)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196
And how does Newt plan to prevent OPEC from regulating production to keep price where they want them?

If we would take advantage of the resources we have in this country, we wouldn't need anything from OPEC, and their demand would go down--plus we could actually export our own oil and gas.

6 posted on 02/14/2012 6:01:47 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196
And how does Newt plan to prevent OPEC from regulating production to keep price where they want them?

Abolish the EPA?
7 posted on 02/14/2012 6:07:11 AM PST by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Yes it is pandering just like the 40 % rollback of Obama’s policies on the first day in office. unrealistic. but good ideas.


8 posted on 02/14/2012 6:08:36 AM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok; Reaganite Republican; Harlan1196; TomGuy

I don’t recall if it was the threat of opening up the reserves, or drilling to increase domestic oil production that G.W. Bush threatened once upon a time, and of a sudden the price of gasoline at the pump dropped like a rock.

Do you all recall that incident?

I would think that were Palin, Gingrich, or some other conservative with an attitude in the drivers seat again, and with a compatible Congress that a whole lot could happen simply with nuance, or innuendo, much less cooperative congressional legislation.


9 posted on 02/14/2012 6:09:23 AM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Personal *PING*


10 posted on 02/14/2012 6:11:06 AM PST by Reaganite Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196

Remember Nixon’s and Carter’s Idea of Price freezes ?


11 posted on 02/14/2012 6:11:57 AM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

I would have to see some hard numbers regarding reserves and production capacity.

Here is also something to consider - how is the President going to keep that oil in America? It is a global market run by global companies. If they can sell it for more in China then they will. Cheap gas will simply increase global demand.

Which raises another point - what reason do the oil companies have to go along with Newt’s plan?


12 posted on 02/14/2012 6:12:26 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican
Gingrich: Talkin' TWO DOLLAR Gasoline

Yeah, yeah, that's all well and good, but what's his position on diesel...you know, the stuff that fuels the transportation of goods to market and food production and, um, my pick-up...

13 posted on 02/14/2012 6:13:16 AM PST by and so? (If it angers you, a sarcasm or irony tag after everything I post should be assumed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

REAGAN crashed the price of gasoline!

He even did a deal with the Saudis, he sold them arms and THEY opened up the spigots

When the price of a bbl of oil fell to $20, the USSR’s only real source of hard currency dried up... pushing them on towards their inevitable collapse

And is the Reaganite in this race... that’s what Art Laffer says, good enough for me then


14 posted on 02/14/2012 6:13:39 AM PST by Reaganite Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch

It easy to influence the market in the very short term - it is another to make fundamental changes to the market that produce permanently lower prices. The President doesn’t have that power.

And why would one think that the oil companies want permanently lower prices?


15 posted on 02/14/2012 6:15:50 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

Channeling Michele Bachmann?? Intriguing.


16 posted on 02/14/2012 6:20:05 AM PST by magritte (Nevermind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

Channeling Michele Bachmann?? Intriguing.


17 posted on 02/14/2012 6:21:06 AM PST by magritte (Nevermind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bray
When he entered office it was 1.80 per and then he closed down the Gulf.

In 2000, the average price was 1.52.
In 2004, 1.89.
In 2007, 2.85.
In July 2008, 4.06.
In Jan 2009, 1.61
Today, about 3.48

Source: eia.gov historic view and eia.gov recent annual view

When Obama took office, gas was between 2.86 (Dec 2007) and 3.11 (Feb 2008), not 1.80.

Source: Gasbuddy.com historical chart
18 posted on 02/14/2012 6:26:37 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

I have always though he should say $1.00 gas....

Or at LEAST say “get to” upon full production.

I’m not at all excited about $2.00

wtf?


19 posted on 02/14/2012 6:29:08 AM PST by No!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196
The way Government gets involved, and mostly what Newt is talking about, is to remove the EPA from the process, deregulate all the ridiculous compliance and environmental studies that are designed to take years.

Next, remove all the heavy taxes on the product and fund roads like they are being funded for now, with regular tax revenues. The “road tax” on fuel has never worked, and not one dime of that tax ever went to build or repair a road.

Finally, the very biggest thing they can do, is actually approve a refinery or Nuclear Electric plant or two to be built, and remove that massive restriction to supply.

And yes, absolutely, a President has massive powers at hand to make this happen immediately through emergency executive order.

20 posted on 02/14/2012 6:36:01 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

This alone would cause the economy to start to grow.

Each dollar of gas you burn into the air produces nothing

And the $50 gas tankful means you didnt spend $25 on a baseball mitt or food or a hammer.... etc...

It is ‘broken glass’. The discreditted concept that if you break someone’s window it spurs economic growth because the owner then has to buy new glass and the glass producer gets money and he buys food for his kids and so the grocer gets money and he buys goods to sell so the farmer gets money etc etc...

But this fallacy ignores that the $25 would have been spent on SOME THING ELSE, and instead goes to replace the glass. If you constantly break and repair the glass you end up broke and with nothing to show for your money except a glass window- instead of having the originall glass window and a hammer and a baseball mitt, etc etc.

The same fallacy that made Odumbass in the White House think “Cash for Clunkers” would generate growth when they destroyed all the clunkers that were turned in. (some of them perfectly good and usable.)


21 posted on 02/14/2012 6:36:17 AM PST by Mr. K (Were the Soviet-Era propogandists as gleefully willing as our Lame-stream Media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

Attorney Orly Taitz tells Newt...obama not qualified to pick tomatoes!!!...
http://washington.cbslocal.com/2012/02/14/gingrich-im-not-going-anywhere/


22 posted on 02/14/2012 6:36:41 AM PST by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

I don’t know when this was written, but an average price of $4.09 per gallon is way higher than what I’m seeing now.

To remain credible we need to correct things like that before publishing them.


23 posted on 02/14/2012 6:39:06 AM PST by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

‘unrealistic. but good ideas’

That is exactly what they all said when Gingrich did all those wonders, but he did it!


24 posted on 02/14/2012 6:47:48 AM PST by chrisnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

Wow, a couple of Romney plants. Nice try but we’re not buying what you’re selling.


25 posted on 02/14/2012 6:48:38 AM PST by thatjoeguy (MAYDAY! MAYDAY! We are so going in ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

The Federal excise tax is 18 cents per gallon - Federal taxes are presently 5% of the retail price. He can cut federal taxes to zero and still not make much of a difference.

http://energyalmanac.ca.gov/gasoline/margins/index.php

I understand the president has enormous domestic powers. But oil is a global commodity - it is foolish to think the president can influence much control over global oil prices.

Cheap gas means more demand. More demand means higher prices. Basic economics.


26 posted on 02/14/2012 6:50:44 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Between Dec 2007 and Feb 2008? I believe Obama was inaugurated in Jan of 2009!
27 posted on 02/14/2012 6:52:41 AM PST by MissP-38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: magritte

Newt needs to get Sarah and Michelle and Perry and Cain and all the others to get out in public for him the day before super tuesday, or Mitt might take it.

We need to contact anyone we know who knows them to tell them that AND Make it a point to target the day before super tuesday for US to make a supreme effort

My current favorite ticket would be Gingrich/Santorum


28 posted on 02/14/2012 6:53:54 AM PST by Mr. K (Were the Soviet-Era propogandists as gleefully willing as our Lame-stream Media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

I preferred Bachmann’s gas price pledge. LOL


29 posted on 02/14/2012 6:55:46 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196

.....”The President doesn’t have that power.”

It’s far more than just drilling, and increasing gasoline production. It’s the President and Congress together getting government the “H” out of way, and returning our economy back to sanity, people working again will of course cause the other side of the effect Gingrich is talking about. It isn’t the oil companies that dictate what the price will be in this kind of market. It is the freedom of the free market, the overall market, and government getting the Hell out of the way that causes what the price will be.

The oil companies will charge what they must to maintain a profit, and remain in business in whatever economy exists at any given time. If employment ramps up once again, and the economy improves it will be strongly achieved by access to cheap, or say cheaper energy supplies.

Gingrich is right in saying what he is saying as he intends to get the economy moving by reducing, or cleaning out the Federal government of the infestation of the impaired minds of the Leftist block. Kinda like running a balloon through blood vessels to clean out all the muck so the blood of the free market can flow again.

I’m sayin’ don’t just focus on the oil companies alone, and go negative on what Gingrich, or Palin are saying. It’s the overall picture of a cleaned up small Constitutional Republican government free from stupid Leftist obstacles, and a free market that will bring back $2.00 a gallon gasoline.


30 posted on 02/14/2012 7:00:19 AM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

Exactly.
When we are energy independent, we will drive down the world oil price, that will drain their wealth and bring them to their knees. Meanwhile, we have booming econmy, propsperity for all.
Yes the pres can effect a quick change. See how obozo stops the Keystone pipeline and causes the loss of thousands of jobs, and results in loss of potential energy independence!?


31 posted on 02/14/2012 7:01:15 AM PST by chrisnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

Nixon imposed price controls specifically to fight inflation - those price controls contributed to lower domestic oil production and gas shortages during the 1979 energy crisis. Carted dismantled those price controls in phases starting in 1979 - Reagan removed the last controls on domestic oil in 1981.

The lesson learned was that price controls reduced production and led to shortages. There is a certain cost associated with drilling and refining oil that varies wildly depending on where it is located and its quality. At lower gas prices, you may never recover your production costs from certain oil fields - it would make more economic sense to leave the oil in the ground until prices went up.


32 posted on 02/14/2012 7:02:43 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196

I would think if we are exporting oil, there will be more supply than demand, or supply will equal demand. With competition, the oil-producing cartel won’t be able to dictate the price. Then the price will be stabilized to a certain level.


33 posted on 02/14/2012 7:12:13 AM PST by chrisnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

Written this morning, current price report linked above


34 posted on 02/14/2012 7:12:37 AM PST by Reaganite Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch
All of those ideas make perfect sense.

I think you misunderstood my comments on the role of the oil companies. They will do everything in their power to balance production and prices to optimize profit. That is what the free market is all about. The problem with Newt's comments is that he has no way of knowing if the free market will support $2 gas.

As for the government getting the hell out of the way, lets not forget that the oil industry receives major subsidies from the government:

“The United States government provides a large subsidy to oil companies, with major tax breaks at virtually every stage of oil exploration and extraction. Revenue attributable to capital investment, including the costs of oil field leases and drilling equipment, are taxed at an effective rate of nine percent, which is a much lower rate than the 25% rate for general business taxes and lower than the taxes of virtually any other industry, according to a 2005 study by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office. For example, while the Deepwater Horizon oil rig was registered in the Marshall Islands, since registering off-shore lowered the U.S. tax liability, the U.S. government was giving the rig’s owner, British Petroleum (BP), a major tax break when BP leased the rig: 70% of the rent was written off in the form of a tax break used only by the oil industry, for a tax deduction of more than $225,000 per day from the day the lease began.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petroleum_industry

Think what would happen if those subsidies were removed and oil companies passed those costs on to the consumer. Government polices are presently acting to keep gas prices below market value.

A move to a true free market approach might actual increase the price of gas.

35 posted on 02/14/2012 7:15:51 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196

I would have to see some hard numbers regarding reserves and production capacity.


Did around in the following link and you’ll probably find some numbers.

http://www.eia.gov/petroleum/reports.cfm?t=68


36 posted on 02/14/2012 7:26:55 AM PST by deport (..............God Bless Texas............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: chrisnj

We still import 47% of our oil - and that is after domestic oil production soaring to a 40 year high.

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/oct/29/business/la-fi-oil-boom-20111029

It is not certain that we will ever be a net-exporting country when it comes to oil. History shows that as oil prices decline then domestic production declines - a lot of American oil is more expensive to extract then Middle East oil.

Additionally, increased domestic production would be absorbed by a growing US economy and population.

We will never be able to challenge OPEC on production - our know oil reserves are tiny compared to the rest of the world. We will be dependent on foreign oil for a long time unless we fundamentally change our economy to slash oil consumption.


37 posted on 02/14/2012 7:28:32 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196

Subsidies!? This is talking about government controls in the form of government taxation, and government dictated breaks in government taxation. “Here I’ll take your arm, and your leg, and give you back a finger.” The finger they give back is Obama’s favorite. Such a deal.

That too has to all be reworked. Free Enterprise works best when it’s free to be enterprising.

I’m outta here probably for the rest of today until this evening. Have a nice day, and thanks for the interesting responses.


38 posted on 02/14/2012 7:29:37 AM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

“End the ban on oil shale development in the American West, where we have three times the amount of oil as Saudi Arabia.”

America’s oil shale reserves are enormous, totaling at least 1.5 trillion barrels of oil. That’s five times the
reserves of Saudi Arabia! And yet, no one is producing commercial quantities of oil from these vast deposits. All that oil is still sitting right where God left it, buried under the vast landscapes of Colorado and Wyoming.

But what if we could safely and economically get our hands on all that oil? Imagine how the world might change. The U.S. would instantly have the world’s largest oil reserves. Imagine…having so much oil we’d never have to worry about Saudi Arabia again, or Hugo Chavez, or the mullahs in Tehran. And instead of ships lined up in L.A.’s port to unload cheap Chinese goods, we might see oil tankers lined up waiting to export America’s tremendous oil bounty to the rest of the world. The entire geopolitical and economic map of the world would change…and the companies in the vanguard of oil shale development might make hundreds of billions of dollars as they convert America’s untapped shale reserves into a brand new energy revolution.

http://dailyreckoning.com/oil-shale-reserves/


39 posted on 02/14/2012 7:38:06 AM PST by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissP-38
My error.

So, that puts the highest gas prices in history on GW Bush's watch. Of course, many of the loyalist Bushbots will say that the Dem-controlled Congress is to blame for that.


40 posted on 02/14/2012 7:58:29 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

“Yes it is pandering just like the 40 % rollback of Obama’s policies on the first day in office. unrealistic. but good ideas”

Its not pandering at all. Rolling back executive orders can be done instantly and that is what Newt plans to do. Any agency that was created by an executive order (EPA) can be closed by executive order. Mitt and Rick cannot think of even one agency they can bear to part with. Newt will get rid of Dept of Energy and Dept of Educ for starters.

If you like the job Boehner and McConnell are doing you will love Romney and Santorum.


41 posted on 02/14/2012 7:58:58 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Harlan1196
And how does Newt plan to prevent OPEC from regulating production to keep price where they want them?

When we produce as much oil as OPEC.

42 posted on 02/14/2012 8:00:51 AM PST by painter (Rebuild The America We love!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thatjoeguy

Not sure why you would think I am a “Romney plant”?? But don’t let your emotions get in the way of fact, what I posted with regards to Refined Motor Fuel is absolutely 100% factually correct, If you really think I am a Romney plant, maybe you shouldn’t be taking bongloads at 5 in the morning or the least you could do is share with the rest of us. Now stick to the issue at hand, We do not need more Gasoline at this point in time, we have way too much and people are not buying gasoline at the rate we normally would see in a vibrant economy, that is why our EXPORTS ARE AT RECORD LEVELS (high) and our USAGE is ALSO AT RECORD LEVELS (Low). All of this can be verified with very little effort on your part, You do not even have to leave this site to find the answers but you must put the Bong down first and then actually open your eyes.


43 posted on 02/14/2012 8:05:00 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: painter
And is that remotely possible?

Are we really going to out produce Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, Kuwait, Venezuela and the UAE? Plus all the non- OPEC countries like Russia, Norway and Mexico?

We are the number 3 oil producing nation in the world. We are also the number one oil consuming nation by a huge margin (3 times the consumption of China). Hence we also the number one importer of oil in the world by a huge margin.

We would have to double our production to reduce our imports to zero. Which means we would be producing twice what Saudi Arabia is producing right now. We would have to TRIPLE our production to equal just OPEC’s production.

44 posted on 02/14/2012 8:18:44 AM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite
America’s oil shale reserves are enormous, totaling at least 1.5 trillion barrels of oil.

That's true. But is that oil extractable at a cost which is consistent with $2 a gallon gas? I would need some convincing.

45 posted on 02/14/2012 8:32:20 AM PST by Notary Sojac (Liberalism: Ideas so good, they have to be mandatory!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Gasoline prices did drop momentarily, as you note, down to $1.61 (I think I paid $1.49 at one point). We know how to do it — crash the world economy. Not sure that’s a good idea now.

Oil prices have to come down significantly to get to $2 gasoline. We could produce everything we know about in the U.S., and wouldn’t get $2 gasoline. In fact, if oil prices were low enough to get $2 gasoline, it wouldn’t be economically feasable to produce new oil in this country. Certainly not mile-deep deepwater wells in the gulf, or shale oil conversions in the midwest.

THe only way I can think of to get to $2 gasoline is if I take all my money and invest it in oil companies. Last time I invested in an oil stock, the price dropped to 95 cents. :-)


46 posted on 02/14/2012 12:45:35 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Notary Sojac

“But is that oil extractable at a cost which is consistent with $2 a gallon gas?”

How would you know if you don’t try it?

The shale oil is NOT the only source of energy unused in the US. If the drilling was freed from Obama’s diktats, hundreds of million barrels could be produced, making America independent of energy imports and who knows, one day even an energy exporter.

The free market will play its role. More American produced oil on the market will lower the gas price. Simple Simon.


47 posted on 02/14/2012 12:53:39 PM PST by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite
More American produced oil on the market will lower the gas price.

I agree, however I would never promise that it would go down to $2, for lots of reasons already posted up-thread.

48 posted on 02/14/2012 1:35:16 PM PST by Notary Sojac (A liberal, a conservative, and a moderate walk into a bar. The bartender says, "Hi. Mitt!!".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson