Posted on 02/17/2012 9:22:14 AM PST by Oldpuppymax
The Liberty Legal Foundation has filed an appeal with the Georgia Superior Court in the case of Weldon v Obama, one of the three Georgia lawsuits claiming Barack Hussein Obama to be Constitutionally ineligible to serve as president of the United States or to be included on the Georgia ballot. (1)
It is perhaps significant that the very act of filing the appeal was fought by the Superior Court clerk’s office which claimed that an additional $2 fee had not been included with Liberty Legal’s paperwork for the filing of separate motions.
Additionally, the Court Clerk invented numerous excuses to prevent the filing, moving from one to the next whenever it was pointed out by Liberty Legal attorneys that none reflected normal court operating procedure. According to Liberty Legal attorney Van Irion, the clerk’s conduct was, in the course of his entire legal experience, “unheard of.” (2)
As a side note, although the paperwork had been provided some 7 days earlier, the clerk’s office failed to inform Liberty that there was a problem. The clerk simply “sat on the petition” and the filing deadline of TODAY would have been missed had Irion not called to make certain the filing had taken place!
The appeal itself is based upon the claim that the “rights of the appellant [had] been prejudiced because the finding of the Secretary of State (was) affected by…error of law.” (1)
That is, Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp, who approved Judge Michael Malihi’s Administrative Court decision, had done so in spite of (or due to) mistakes of law made by the Judge in deciding the case.
As Irion states in the appeal, the decision of the Judge “not only violates…
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
For what purpose was the BC entered into evidence by Irion?
Or have you suddenly retired from the intellectual field of battle?
Even though he played the fool he wasn’t one.
"No." Didn't think so, and I'd be surprised if it was; at least not satisfactorily or honestly.
I agree its not logical that zer0 would have had anything to do with the CIA. Yet we have docs destroyed, web pages blackened out, everything about this bozo seems hidden by the brightest and the best.Hard to imagine there is no CIA influence there somewhere. Than you have to ask why????
Why are all these documents destroyed, sealed or forged? Why do we have this "witness protection president"? Why are these tenacious Obots so confident in their protestations and assertions that Obama is a NBC?
Maybe he's really someone else.
Ya think!
I also served on two guided missile frigate, a carrier and and admiral’s flagship.
You will have to smear the entire US Navy before you are done. Do you think that’s a path you want to start down? Perhaps you should check with the site owner first?
See @221.
You'll need to read down from there.
He wanted to prove that Obama’s father was not a US citizen. Which is a true fact that even Obama would have testified to.
He and Hatfield argued that Obama was not eligible because he did not have two citizen parents. The judge accepted the evidence but rejected the legal argument.
You see all those little numbers in that post? They are the citations that show where the facts come from.
So you tell me - what system of law does America have?
Come on, Harlan, answer the question!
For what purpose was the BC entered into evidence by Irion?
So next question...Did Malihi refute the definition of NBC in Minor and state why he did so?
I disagree. For the most part CIA are patriots. Under Democrat presidents they are crippled and under GOP they are empowered (certain yellowcake episodes excepted). Back in the early 1980’s the (mostly) patriot defenders in the CIA were under William Casey who acted on the directions of Ronald Reagan to recruit foreign nationals in foreign countries and to oppose KGB infiltration of the CIA.
Barry is exactly the type of likely KGB mole who would be excluded.
Remember the widely circulated report of the US businessman in Russia in the early 1990’s who reported that a top level Soviet woman got drunk and told his that the KGB had an attractive black man being prepared to be US president?
IMO, Ayers and Dohrn were KGB (she was in Cuba being trained to implement Days of Rage in Chicago in 1968, IIRC) and IMO, Barry got hooked up with them in 1981 when he arrived in NYC...the same year I first interviewed with the CIA. I find the report of a KGB Manchurian Candidate being prepped to be president to be credible and, most likely, Ayers and Dohrn were in charge of the project.
And...
Those are all active statutes. 1999, 2005, 1975
Were the original laws altered?
“This Court finds the decision and analysis of Arkeny persuasive.”
Your reply only raises another question...Since when has a State case ever held precedent over a SCOTUS case?
Can you show a single Supreme Court ruling on a Constitutional issue where case law and precedence was not a factor?
If we were not a common law country, why are eligibility lawyers using Minor? Are you saying it is a binding precedent on a Constitutional matter?
WKA as encapsulated in Ankeny is settled law. It does not need to be re-argued - merely applied.
The core of Ankeny is WKA. WKA is the law of the land.
I really have to admire your patience.
If we were not a common law country, why are eligibility lawyers using Minor?
Have I claimed we are not a common law country? On the contrary, as you well know. @229 - There's common law, that being the concept of precedence. It is just one part of our legal system.
Are you saying it is a binding precedent on a Constitutional matter?
Are you trying to put words in my mouth again?
Why are you misdirecting the conversation and not simply answering the question?
Did Malihi refute the definition of NBC in Minor and state why he did so?
It does not need to be re-argued - merely applied.
The same as with Minor.
The core of Ankeny is WKA.
And didn't even Ankeny state that Ark wasn't a NBC?
WKA is the law of the land.
So is Minor.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.