Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rick Santorum Convicts Trayvon Martin Shooter On Hannity Show
The Conservative Review ^ | Mar.23, 2012 | Marcus Porcius

Posted on 03/24/2012 8:10:55 AM PDT by Josh Painter

Just moments ago on the Sean Hannity radio show, GOP candidate and RINO Rick Santorum took it upon himself to convict George Zimmerman in the Trayvon Martin case. He said, and I’m paraphrasing slightly:

*It was a heinous crime and he did a despicable, unjustifiable thing and the Sanford police should have reacted to that immediately.*

Again, I am paraphrasing a little as I did not have a recorder running to get his exact words, but that was essentially his statement.

To further paraphrase, in this case Anti-President Obama, Rick Santorum acted stupidly. He doesn’t know all the facts. He wasn’t there. He hasn’t seen the scene of the shooting. He doesn’t know if there was a disparity of force involved, which justifies using a gun. He doesn’t know who started the fight. He doesn’t actually know anything. Nobody but George Zimmerman actually knows what happened and why. The rest of us will have to wait until the evidence comes out… and it will come out.

But not Rick Santorum. Not when you’re in a race to make sure you don’t get called racist for not being properly outraged that a black teen was shot. No, then you run (don’t walk) to the nearest microphone and to all intents and purpose call George Zimmerman a racist murderer and the Sanford police his accomplices. It’s pathetic and obvious pandering.

If this is an example of his leadership, Rick Santorum has no business in the White House. Not that I thought he did in the first place, of course, but this just confirms it.

Race pandering deserves an F every time.


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012election; 2016election; blackkk; crime; election2012; election2016; florida; georgezimmerman; pennsylvania; racepandering; ricksantorum; rosewaterrickey; santorumtruthfile; slickrickie; trayvonmartin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-123 last
To: SeaHawkFan

If Zimmerman left the safety of his truck to go after a guy leaving his area, whether walking or running, is proof that Zimmerman was not being threatened.

Not at that point.

Zimmerman has no probable cause to go after Martin.

He’s an observer. No probable cause needed.

If Zimmerman never caught Martin, how could there have been a fight.

Martin caught Zimmerman?

You really need to read the phone call transcripts, police reports, and witness statements. You don’t seem to have much understanding of the events that transpired.


121 posted on 03/24/2012 5:25:18 PM PDT by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: demkicker

If Zimmerman goes to trial, Zimmerman will get to expose Martin with any “discovery” available to him.


122 posted on 03/24/2012 10:59:23 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

Wrong.
I can follow anyone I want to follow, and that person does not have the right to attack me.


123 posted on 03/24/2012 11:09:44 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-123 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson