BOTH OBAMAS SURRENDERED law licenses in '93 & '08

Liberty.com ^ | 05/09/2012 | Liberty.com

[Mich1193]

This can be easily veriified at https://www.iardc.org Stands for Illinois Attorney Registration And Disciplinary Committee. It's the official arm of lawyer discipline in Illinois; and they are very strict and mean as hell.

1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a "lawyer". He surrendered his license back in 2008 in order to escape charges he lied on his bar application.

A "Voluntary Surrender" is not something where you decide "Gee, a license is not really something I need anymore, is it?" and forget to renew your license. No, a "Voluntary Surrender" is something you do when you've been accused of something, and you 'voluntarily surrender" your license five seconds before the state suspends you.

2 Michelle Obama "voluntarily surrendered" her law license in 1993. after a Federal Judge gave her the choice between surrendering her license or STAND TRIAL FOR insurance FRAUD.

[Flotsam_Jetsome]

IBTZ = In Before The Zot, rather than I Bring The Zot.

[allmost]

I’m familiar with the nomenclature.

[Kenny Bunk]

Mich, this is an endlessly recycled story ... that just so happens to be true, even if the faithful obamanators don't care.

Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. (or II) was on the receiving end of the following complaints from fellow members of the bar:
(1) He never reported using the alias,"Barry Soetoro," (or Soebarka) or possibly several others"
(2)He failed to report traffic violations
(3)He failed to report Drug Use.

This is fairly heavy-duty stuff among the legal-beagle pack. Michelle seems to have made a serious, but IMHO,a somewhat more forgivable mistake: i.e., she appears to have believed a client, who was in fact, committing major insurance fraud.

Underlying both cases, it seems undeniable that both of these Affirmative Action wunderkinden were absolutely lousy lawyers! In point of fact, neither of them worked on very much legal stuff at all. Again, Michelle has a bit more actual legal work experience and product than Studley, even if she was never entrusted with anything too complicated or serious!

One more point: Obama "The Constitutional Law Professor:"
He was an adjunct instructor ... nothing more. To top it off, it was a political appointment, which required very few hours and little work. To ice the crap cake, he was absolutely lousy at that, too.

Of the two, Michelle might actually have a shot a reinstatement. Barack, never. As is quite common in Bar Association housekeeping, they were allowed to "surrender" their licenses, rather than face disciplinary hearings.

[Flotsam_Jetsome]

"I'm familiar with the nomenclature."

Then why the comment "You gonna zot him ace?"

Is my FR born-on date still too fresh to put up ibtz or or something? Forgive my temerity.
/s

[Kenny Bunk]

Ping

[allmost]

I use the term out of respect. I do not know you and try to be respectful.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[Flotsam_Jetsome]

In that case, thank you for the clarification. Appreciate making your acquaintance. See you around, FRiend. :)

[allmost]

Are you going to make our next interaction this difficult?

[Flotsam_Jetsome]

"Are you going to make our next interaction this difficult?"

LOL

No, I'll make sure to take my meds beforehand next time around. ;)

[allmost]

You know what I’m talking about.

[Flotsam_Jetsome]

"You know what I’m talking about."

Actually, I'm not sure that I do. Is there some kind of lingering rancor that I'm unaware of?

[allmost]

I am trying to be nice.

[Vendome]

We’re trying to figure out if they are brothers or chameleons..

[Vendome]

Uhm-K.

It’s possible this poster and the OP are co-conspirators with one one identity as an OP and the other an object schill, to support the rantings of ....???? What???

We saw all this years ago and this guy is an agitator.

[Flotsam_Jetsome]

Uhm-K.

It’s possible this poster and the OP are co-conspirators with one one identity as an OP and the other an object schill, to support the rantings of ....???? What???

We saw all this years ago and this guy is an agitator.

Okay, time to make the donuts.

I can't speak to the poster "allmost" and the OP being co-conspirators or what the true aims of the blog being pimped are, but I was baffled and dis-possessed of my gruntle enough by the nature of the exchange that I had with them that I decided to do some perusing of the posting history of "allmost."

Shockingly, I didn't have to go back very far at all before finding a string of disruptive, condescending, rude, crude and oftentimes downright nonsensical statements, usually no more than a sentence or two long, and

"I am trying to be nice." one-liners or equivalent thrown in occasionally to "cool the rods," as it were.

Recent examples:

Nonsensical

This one deserves full citation: "Yes the tax laws are racist. Numbers hate. Females and minorities hardest hit as usual. White males are just coasting on their lovely racist pillow. Give me a f***ing break. Open your eyes, grow up, learn to think. Any of them work."

Follow the replies chain on this.

Rude, don't you think?

Agitate much?

And then one "apology" after another.

To my mind there are only two questions relevant at this time:

1. Will Ozone be served up?

2. Will it be a Double? (OP too)

For the Mods: All of the people Pinged here have had interaction with one or more of the other participants, with the exception of TOL.

For the unsolicited Pingees: My apologies if anyone was intruded upon; I felt it was relevant to Ping each of you, in case anyone wished to weigh in.

yoroshiku onegaishimasu

[traditional1]

Thanks for the heads-up.

[DiogenesLamp]

For the unsolicited Pingees: My apologies if anyone was intruded upon; I felt it was relevant to Ping each of you, in case anyone wished to weigh in.

I feel left out. :)

[Kenny Bunk]

There is nothing here that was not known in 2007.

(I.)
Barry submitted what was in essence a fraudulent Bar App.
(1)Not disclosing aliases
(2)Not reporting traffic violations
(3)Not reporting drug use.

Michelle, probably through negligence, was complicit in an insurance fraud. Both were spectacularly incompetent attorneys with very little actual experience.
Nothing really unusual here, though. By this point in our legal history, every large law firm in the country and their clients have been burned/disappointed by Affirmative Action Ani. However, Bar Associations will always seek any reason to offer their members the opportunity to "Surrender," rather than face Disciplinary Hearings. Nothing unusual here, either. As GBS said, "Every profession is a conspiracy against the laity."

(II.)
Barry was NOT THE EDITOR of the Harvard Law Review. He was the President. IOW, he managed the office, which was already managed by paid staff. His was largely a ceremonial post, although in addition to hanging around cocktail parties as a certified Harvard "exotic," he did attend meetings. He apparently neither wrote, nor edited anything for the review.

(III.)
Barry was NOT A CONSTITUTIONAL LAW PROFESSOR. He received a political appointment as an Adjunct Instructor ... again a post which required very little actual work. What minimal work he actually did was reported by the students to be quite substandard.

What is quite amazing about the more or less accurate ... but rather dated .... information posted by so many of us in this thread is that most of the voting public have no idea WTF we are talking about or why it even matters. The Infotainment Industry has done its job very well indeed.

BTW, BJ Clinton was "Suspended" from the Arkansas Bar, not disbarred, which punishment many Bar Members sought.

[spacejunkie2001]

(not so) humble gunner...have you ever posted ANY articles???? Apparently not or you’d know you have to EXCERPT every one of them. FR will not let you copy the entire thing to the post.

You’re just a pompass ass that doesn’t know what he’s talking about but is hellbent on attacking almost every person on here that posts something not to his liking.