Posted on 06/20/2012 4:34:56 PM PDT by NoLibZone
Sarah Palin says that Obama did not respect the balance of power in the federal government when he issued his executive order last week on immigration, that he is now just telling Americans what he deems best by fiat. It was so blatant that she also suggested that we go back and talk to some of his former students because it’s clear Obama doesn’t understand our constitutional process.
She was also asked about criticism that she didn’t mention Romney in her speech at Right Online. But her reason was simple, that it would have violated the ground rules based on AFP’s legal status as a non-profit. But she makes very clear where she stands and said that if the vote were had today, she wouldn’t blink in voting for Romney over Obama and maintains she’s always held the position of anybody but Obama.
Watch below Video at link:
BUT A LIBERAL! Keep it honest, there, mittbot. Either way - evil liberalism wins. Now who is the delusional one.
:)
As you bow to evil and accuse others of bible thumping and posting Scripture. We know who your god is, mittbot.
A praying glass crawler says Truth is insulting.
_____________________________
Really? What do I look like?
The rest of your post is equally non-sensical. And, sorry, but not cover for your obama shilling.
Talking out your butt, again, I see. You don't know her prepared remarks. What you do know it that she supported and voted for NEWT. Keep it honest, sparky, while in your PDS mode.
Describes mittbots perfectly as they are drawn to such - the LYING LIBERAL Willard.
Voter turnout often decides elections. I was just calling voter turnout an indirect vote.
How much more clear can it be that if the voter turnout is poor for a candidate, his opponent benefits by being able to win with that many less votes. Or trying to be even more crystal clear for you, if one candidates voters do not turn out, then the election is handed to his opponent.
So yes, it is entirely factual and truthful that when a Conservative fails to support the GOP nominee, then he is helping the opposing Democrat candidate win.
This is clear as day.
You know, the jokes work better for folks that understand them.
I'll either type slower or use smaller words for you next time.
Keep it honest, mittbot.
Your opinion of Palin is the same as the LIBERAL baby killing pro same sex marriage candidate COWARD Romney - straight from the pit, mittbot.
It is clear as day, and it is also clear as day that Romney is an enemy of conservatives. You can vote for the enemy if you want and rationalize it as you please, but it will still be a vote FOR liberalism.
It is clear as day.
You are Romney shilling -- you are shilling for an authoritarian statist Republican, asking, bullying, and trying to frighten people into voting for him, and you were one of the most blatant users of wholesale deception to misrepresent and denigrate Palin on this forum a few years ago. YOU ARE A KNOWN QUANTITY. An Obama shill would be asking people to vote for Obama; emotional rationalizers bleat that "If you don't vote for Romney, it's the same thing, therefore you're Obama shilling," which is a fallacy that comforts them as it deceives them.
I am shilling for rejecting both statists, Obama and Romney, and for thoughtfully using the top-of-the-ticket vote to make either one as weak as possible in the White House. Once again, you are devious and deceitful, to both yourself and your fellow FReepers.
Your tagline is exactly what you would get with Romney.
No Hum-gun, your jokes are so lame that they require explanation.
At least you’re trying to twist them slightly different now.
Maybe you can twist your famous Sarah sandwich joke or your famous Sarah is in it for just the money joke or your famous attack the Palin family jokes or your famous shades of a *concerned troll* jokes that a lot of Freepers worship Sarah.
Say, just thinking, were you supposed to not be trying to hijack Palin threads anymore and make them about your attention whore seaking self?
Just asking.
presently no screen name: Jim R. is allowing rabid Romney fans to castigate non-Romney Freepers, calling us vile names over and over;this thread is full of it. As a result, I won’t be reading or posting anymore on political threads that involve Romney. Vile Romney posters can have it. I’m through taking the abuse.
Truly, vileness should be stowed where the sun don’t shine. By both those willing to consider voting Romney in November, and those not thus willing. The discussion about the merits otherwise seems to keep dissolving into “how horrible you and your best buddy Mitt are!” “No, how horrible you and your best buddy Obama are!” “Mittbot!” “Obamabot!”
And DU and Kos kids watch this going on, and grin from ear to ear.
I agree 100%. I really dislike Romney and think he’s a wishy-washy panderer, but he’s not an America-hating, Marxist, Franklin Davis/Bill Ayers disciple who wishes to remake America as Hugo Chavez is remaking Venezuela.
Ed
I'm doing that just for you, out of respect and high regard.
Why don’t you two hug, kiss, and make up???
If my feelings are hurt by folks who call me vile names, then it becomes ALL ABOUT ME. As it happens, it's all about something much more important. If my feelings get frazzled, too bad, I'll get over it -- my mission is to spread as many seeds as I can to get folks considering the better alternative to ABO and the very dangerous consequences of a Romney landslide.
I hope you rethink your decision, Marcella, because yours is a strong and sensible voice.
I did love her once.
This is not good enough. She’s still hedging her bets and playing to the choir.
She needs to get behind Romney firmly, enthusiasticly and quickly.
What is the point in this tepid endorsement?
Just another case of keeping people hanging like she did over running for president. That move on her part was very damaging to the primaries as it left a lot of people scrambling for a candidate.
Well, we have one now and we need to support him, including Sarah.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.