Posted on 07/19/2013 9:25:49 AM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
A fogbow member has gone full throttle at trying to destroy the career of Reed Hayes, the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Cold Case Posse forensic document expert. Mr. Hayes wrote a 40 page report documenting his evidence that backs up the Cold Case Posse's investigation proving Obama's birth certificate is a 100% forgery. The fact that the fogbow member would go to such lengths to write a letter to the President of the NADE (National Association Of Document Examiners) complaining about Reed Hayes work ethics shows desperation to destroy his career.
This individual who did this asked Reed Hayes in a email to give him his 40 page reports findings. Hayes politely turned him down in a response email. Soon after, this fogbow member started attacking Reed Hayes credibility along with his other fogbow members on his radio program. They started calling him a quack on message boards. Reed Hayes has impeccable credentials that no fogbow member can match. This attempt to discredit Reed Hayes and ruin his career show that these people lack moral values, American pride and patriotism, and will do anything to protect Obama's ineligibility to be president.
(Excerpt) Read more at rcradioblog.wordpress.com ...
Wurlitzer-
I was, in fact, pre-press specialist when the BC was released. I immediately downloaded it from the WH website and lifted the hood on the PDF document they had posted. It took me about 5 seconds to determine that the document was a construct using parts of other images to piece together an official looking forgery. That’s my professional opinion. FWIW
They are saying Zullo used the wrong vital statistics coding manual in which he did not. He used a Hawaiian coding manual from 1961 that shows that ‘negro’ was used back then. Not ‘African’ as the fogbowers contend that Barack Obama Sr. self reported himself as that to the nurse when filling out the birth certificate. Also the fogbowers are now stating they no the reasons why the birth certificate has so many layers and why everyone thinks it I a forgery. Here is what one fogbower said when asked to explain how it happened:
“It’s very simple. A Xerox Workcentre 7655 is an all-in-one copier/scanner/printer/fax that is standard office equipment in many organizations. One of these organizations is the Whitehouse... and we know this because other documents that the Whitehouse has posted online were scanned on that system (such as the President’s Tax Returns). These are rather large, high volume, shared machines located in what we would have used to call a “copier room” so that a large number of people can get to it when they need it. And when they are used as scanners, the operator has to put in their e-mail address because that’s how they get the digital file; it is scanned to a PDF which the machine then emails to the operator.
When a Xerox Workcentre 7655 scans a document to email, it uses a number of proprietary and patented Xerox compression algorithms to process the document for size, legibility and quality using MRC and JBIG2 encoding. I’ll explain those more in a moment. Taken together, these algorithms automatically produce .pdf files that possess every single one of the “anomalies” that birthers have claimed are proof that the .pdf of the President’s birth certificate is a manually created forgery. These include:
1. Multiple layers consisting of one full page color JPEG and multiple monochrome bitmasks of varying sizes.
2. The bitmasks are reduced in resolution by 1/2 (i.e. the JPEG is 300 dpi, and the bitmasks are 150 dpi) and rotated 90 degrees.
3. The bitmasks can be individually selected and “moved around the image” when opened in Adobe Illustrator. They consist of “objects” that the scanner has identified as being similar enough in color and position to be considered and compressed as a single “object.”
4. Signatures and date stamps that are “broken up” and distributed across different layers.
5. Shadows and halos in the JPEG layer where the bitmasks have been separated out.
6. A “clipping mask” that crops the edge of the document and conceals a few pixels of the image along each margin (This is called “edge erase” and its purpose is to remove punch holes, images of staples or binding that detract from the image. It removes a default of 0.12 inches on all sides... precisely what is missing between the Savannah Guthrie photo of the paper original and the posted PDF.).
7. Pixel identical letters, symbols or boxes (this is part of the JBIG2 encoding process).
And finally, the metadata is identical with files that were first scanned on the Xerox, but then reopened and printed to PDF in the MAC OS standard “Preview.” Why would this last step happen? The document needed to be posted “right side up” on the Whitehouse.gov website. It apparently was originally scanned upside down. So it was opened in Preview, rotated 180 degrees, and then printed to PDF.
So... here is the exhaustive account of “human intervention” in the creation of the PDF.
1. A person loaded the original paper document into a Xerox Workcentre 7655 printer/copier/scanner fax, entered their email address and then “scanned to e-mail.”
2. A person opened the attachment on the email they received on their MAC. They noticed that the image was upside down, rotated it 180 degrees, and then printed to PDF.
4. A person posted that PDF on the Whitehouse.gov website.
That is the entire “forgery” process, right there.”
Yup, the FogBlow-Communists are completely dedicated to their totalitarian causes who will lie, cheat, and steal if they can get away with it.
CCPS!
Thanks for the detailed response!
Bogie
You’re welcome!
“It’s very simple. A Xerox Workcentre 7655 is an all-in-one copier/scanner/printer/fax that is standard office equipment in many organizations. One of these organizations is the Whitehouse... “
CCPS, what about this explanation? First time I’ve heard it.
Thanks guys. Believe I will pass.
The term used for race at that time would have been Negro. In addition there is no such race as African. Africa refers to a Geographical area and not a race.
cpdiii,
“The term used for race at that time would have been Negro.”
We all know that. But, at the article, in the included letter, it stated that that was proven to be “fabricated evidence.” That’s what I wanted cleared up, as I had never heard that claim substantiated.
“The term used for race at that time would have been Negro.”
__
Used by whom? It’s my understanding that the “father’s race” field is supposed to be filled in with whatever term the father chooses to identify his own race (”what the father considers himself to be,” according to the National Center for Health Statistics.)
For Obama Sr., a Kenyan, it would have made sense for him to consider himself African, as seen in the instructions for filling out the 1961 Kenyan census form. The suggested responses for the “race” category included African, Arab, and Somali.
Of the many arguments advanced for considering the birth certificates to be forgeries, this strikes me as one of the very weakest.
This ‘story’ seems to cover some of the issues with the document (not saying it is a true story.) Lets see a scan of a similar document, like a cancelled check, produced through this process.
It does not cover: tab/kerning/text color/alignment/typeface/white halo/coding/color shift/pixelation scale issues.
“The term used for race at that time would have been Negro. In addition there is no such race as African. Africa refers to a Geographical area and not a race.”
The CCP agrees that the race of parents was whatever the parents said it was.
So what would a guy from Kenya list?
He would not consider himself “negro”. In 1962, Kenya held a census. In the instructions for filling out the census form, the authorities stated the following:
“Column 5. Race. - Write European, Arab, Somali, African, etc.”
http://www.hist.umn.edu/~rmccaa/IPUMSI/CensusForms/Africa/ke1962ef_kenya_enumeration_forms.en.pdf
So it would not be surprising that a guy from Kenya would list his race as “African”.
—So it would not be surprising that a guy from Kenya would list his race as “African”.—
Okay. But why would someone filling out a birth cert in Hawaii use that term. I don’t think they would. It would have been like putting down “Virginian” in the race data on my cert., instead of Caucasian.
We are talking about the year 1961, specifically August and we are talking about the U.S. vital statistics codes, specifically for Hawaiian codes that Verna K Lee used.
“what about this explanation?”
Recently, a blogger printed a copy of the lfbc pdf from the White House website, then scanned it back into a computer using a Xerox WorkCentre 7655. The resulting pdf has many of the same characteristics of the White House pdf.
Including the movable registrar signature stamp.
Here is the original website and the discussion:
http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2013/06/24/the-proof-forgery-done-by-xerox-workcentre-7655/
If you look up Obama’s 2010 tax return, the pdf was made on a Xerox WokCentre 7655. It was created almost two weeks before the White house released the LFBC pdf.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/POTUS_taxes.pdf
If you open the tax return in Illustrator, it has layers similar to the BC pdf.
That website is run by a Dr. Conspiracy and Fogbow disciple. He is a amateur and his credentials pertaining to computers is outmatched by the posse’s expert Mara Zebest and Hawaiian court certified forensic handwriting and computer document expert Reed Hayes. That experiment was only to obfuscate the true fact that Obama’s birth document is a 100% forgery. They were unable to duplicate all the anomalies in Obama’s document.
“If you look up Obama’s 2010 tax return, the pdf was made on a Xerox WokCentre 7655.”
How do you know?
We not seen the codes the CCP now says they are using. Originally, the CCP said that the race of father entry should have been “not stated”. This was shown to be not true. Now they make another claim but provide no proof that they haven’t screwed up again.
In this interview,
the day after the July, 2012 press conference, Zullo tells the reporter that the race of the father is a federal code. So according to their new theory, the term “African” should have been struck out and the term “not stated” entered.
In the interview, he also mentions an article written about 10 years ago by a guy named Bennett and that in the article Bennett supported Vern Lee’s statements on how BCs were numbered. But this is not true. Dr. Bennett’s article was written in 1955. And it never mentions how BCs are numbered.
http://www.wnd.com/files/CHARLESBENNETT.pdf
Some people would say he lied, I just think it was sloppy investigation.
The Kenyan census forms were first prepared in 1961. And it clearly shows that in Kenya, the race - African was not outside the realm of possiblity.
Wow. The nativeborncitizen. wordpress.com site libs are celebrating how they’ve pulled the rug out from under Zullo and Arpaio. Maybe they have. Don’t know. You can’t believe a thing they say. I have a bad feeling about this.
(Notice they named the site native born as opposed to natural born...)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.