Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Left Goes Nuts over Truth about 'Transgender' Teen
BarbWire ^ | August 22, 2014 | Gina Miller

Posted on 08/22/2014 6:18:34 AM PDT by WXRGina

Last Saturday, I came across a USA Today story about leaders of a junior high school in New Jersey informing the mother of a 13-year-old boy, who believes he is “transgendered,” that he is not allowed to come to school dressed as a girl. Back just a few short years ago this would not be “news.” It would have been expected that no school, much less a parent, would allow a boy to dress like a girl, but that’s no longer the case. Now, not only is it considered “scandalous” by our idiot media that this school would dare to insist this boy dress correctly as a boy, but the news report goes along with the charade by addressing the boy in feminine pronouns and by his preferred name of “Rachel,” as does his mother. She is in full support of her son “transitioning” to female, as if that were at all possible.

So, I posted the story on my Facebook page with the comment, “This boy’s lunatic mother should be put in prison for aggravated child abuse. This is utterly sickening! Our nation is going to pay dearly for embracing this demonic perversion and pushing our kids head-first into it.” For a couple of days, there was no response, except for my Facebook friends lamenting the sorry state of our nation today and agreeing that the boy’s mother was doing the child a great disservice (to say the least) by encouraging him in his mental delusion, instead of getting him help to overcome it.

Then, a few days later, the homosexual “tolerance” brigade hit, because the radical leftist People for the American Way’s Right Wing Watch had been on my Facebook page and had posted a piece on me with a screen shot of my comment about the boy and his mother and some passages from one of my latest columns. This led to a steady, three-day stream of homo-activist trolls descending on my Facebook page attacking me and defending the boy and his mother. This is standard operating procedure for the militant Left. As we see the power structure and institutions of our nation abandon God, truth and reason, those of us who stand for God, truth and reason are increasingly hated and attacked for it. Those who intend to destroy marriage, to fracture our society and sell immorality of all kinds to the people of our nation (especially the kids) are growing ever more vicious in their anti-Christian campaign.

These people are a small group of frenzied, loud-mouthed homosexual activists and sympathizers who are of like mind. They move in packs on the Internet and collude to swarm comment threads to create the illusion that there are many more of them than there really are. Because they have on their side the media, Hollywood and entertainment industries, many corporations, schools and politicians, some might be led to believe that their demented ideas are widely accepted. They’re not.

Nor is truth on their side. The “transgender” craze, which is part of the larger, tyrannical homosexual movement that ultimately seeks to outlaw Christianity, is being given “credibility” by desperate lies and bunk “science” that seek to convince us that, “… male and female He created them,” is not the case, because they think they know so much more than our Creator. Since the premise of “transgenderism”—that a man could be a woman, and vice versa—is so outlandish, these people must come up with high-sounding “scientific” blather to persuade people that the issue of sex is much more complex than the simplistic idea that all people are either male or female. With enough grant money on the line, there is no lack of willing “political scientists” who gladly provide this movement with “scientific” talking points.

As an example, one of the “transgender” defenders who visited my Facebook page responded to my comment—that a male will always be a male and the DNA doesn’t lie—with this:

Gina – Do you even know how DNA works? Before quoting keywords like “Chromosomes”, I suggest you do some research on the indirect correlation between Genotype and Phenotype and how Genetic Expression in Development actually works. There are 22 other chromosomes beyond the so-called “Sex Chromosomes”. The presence of a sequence of nucleotides or molecule with the right receptors in utero can completely modify or nullify the expression of specific genes.

You see? Here is nonsense speculation wrapped in scientific terminology that is meant to convey the notion that human sexuality is infinitely complex, and for us to claim that we are either male or female, well, that’s just the childish silliness of the low-brow uninformed. Never mind that the best scientists in the world still do not, and likely never will, come close to fully understanding human deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). And, further, none of this has anything to do with the fact that each of us is still either male or female, period, mental illness notwithstanding.

Rather than taking such a circuitous, pseudo-scientific journey to “prove” that “transgenderism” is truly possible, let us view it as it is: a mental and spiritual sickness. In fact, until recently, the mental health world naturally viewed “transgenderism” as the mental illness it is and always will be. It was only recently that the American Psychological Association and a few other groups bowed to political lobbying pressure and “normalized” their classification of such disorders to appease the militant, vocal minority of sexual deviant activists.

However, not everyone is going along with the charade. On Wednesday, CNS News carried a column that will send the radical homosexualists into pseudo-scientific orbit: “Johns Hopkins Psychiatrist: Transgender is ‘Mental Disorder;’ Sex Change ‘Biologically Impossible.’” Oh, yes! Here’s a man who’s unafraid to tell it just like it is. From the column:

Dr. Paul R. McHugh, the former psychiatrist-in-chief for Johns Hopkins Hospital and its current Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry, said that transgenderism is a “mental disorder” that merits treatment, that sex change is “biologically impossible,” and that people who promote sexual reassignment surgery are collaborating with and promoting a mental disorder.

… He also reported on a new study showing that the suicide rate among transgendered people who had reassignment surgery is 20 times higher than the suicide rate among non-transgender people. Dr. McHugh further noted studies from Vanderbilt University and London’s Portman Clinic of children who had expressed transgender feelings but for whom, over time, 70%-80% “spontaneously lost those feelings.”

Common sense tells us that a child who imagines he is the opposite sex will grow out of it. If he doesn’t, then he needs to get treatment to overcome such delusions. And, just as I said about that “transgender” boy’s mother being guilty of aggravated child abuse for encouraging her 13-year-old son—a child, barely near puberty!—to “become a female,” so says Dr. McHugh:

Dr. McHugh also reported that there are “misguided doctors” who, working with very young children who seem to imitate the opposite sex, will administer “puberty-delaying hormones to render later sex-change surgeries less onerous – even though the drugs stunt the children’s growth and risk causing sterility.”

Such action comes “close to child abuse,” said Dr. McHugh, given that close to 80% of those kids will “abandon their confusion and grow naturally into adult life if untreated ….”

“'Sex change’ is biologically impossible,” said McHugh. “People who undergo sex-reassignment surgery do not change from men to women or vice versa. Rather, they become feminized men or masculinized women. Claiming that this is [a] civil-rights matter and encouraging surgical intervention is in reality to collaborate with and promote a mental disorder.”

But, of course, the rational among us know this, and we will keep repeating it. Do not underestimate the determination of this minority of Godless degenerates to use the weapon of “nondiscrimination” laws to silence Christians and others opposed to its immoral agenda. Our very freedoms are in this evil movement’s crosshairs.


TOPICS: Politics; Society; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 08/22/2014 6:18:34 AM PDT by WXRGina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

The least “tolerate” of opposing views are the radical leftists.

The reason they can’t tolerate it is they know, in their heart, they are wrong, and your words condemn them.


2 posted on 08/22/2014 6:25:15 AM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

Mental and Spiritual sickness — Agree

Just like islam (religion of peace), etc.

And might I say liberalism.


3 posted on 08/22/2014 6:26:30 AM PDT by Scrambler Bob (/s /s /s /s /s, my replies are "liberally" sprinkled with them behind every word and letter.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

I have a Facebook page, but I rarely visit it. When people leave unwanted comments, is it possible to Block them like one can do on Twitter?


4 posted on 08/22/2014 6:31:45 AM PDT by JoeDetweiler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Some Of These Things
Are Not Like The Others


Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

5 posted on 08/22/2014 6:34:08 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeDetweiler
I have a Facebook page, but I rarely visit it. When people leave unwanted comments, is it possible to Block them like one can do on Twitter?

Yes, you can block anyone, and you can also set your page to "private," so that only your "friends" can see your posts, and only your friends are allowed to comment. All the preferences are under "settings." I just have my whole page set to "public," and that's why the trolls are able to see it and comment, because I prefer it that way, but I do block a bunch of them!

6 posted on 08/22/2014 6:34:48 AM PDT by WXRGina (The Founding Fathers would be shooting by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

In reality, leftists are striving to create a modern Inquisition, working to destroy anybody who doesn’t adhere to their pagan religious dogma.


7 posted on 08/22/2014 6:35:20 AM PDT by afsnco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

OK....Thanks :-) I need to play around with my page one of these days....figure out how it really works :-)


8 posted on 08/22/2014 6:37:04 AM PDT by JoeDetweiler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

Wonder where dad is in all this.


9 posted on 08/22/2014 6:37:23 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeDetweiler

I resisted Facebook for many years, but then I realized it can be a powerful networking tool for patriots. You just don’t put personal information on it that you don’t want “out there.”


10 posted on 08/22/2014 6:41:33 AM PDT by WXRGina (The Founding Fathers would be shooting by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Yeah...you never hear about that, do you?

I wonder if, in many of these cases, the Mom has a psychosis where she really wanted a daughter?


11 posted on 08/22/2014 6:51:47 AM PDT by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

he probably has a restraining order due to his “interfernece” of this medical process....ie attempts to rescue his SON!


12 posted on 08/22/2014 7:19:39 AM PDT by Shamrock498
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

What parent would encourage this behavior.

As a parent of two daughters, I can assure you that there were plenty of morning battles about make up, short dresses, and visible under garments. I am pleased to say that I was victorious in most of those encounters.

And now, years later my kids have thanked me.

I believe that there ARE transgender folks. But it has nothing to do with the inner girl coming out. It has to do with dealing with your personal interactions with your community. Dress up as a girl at home if you want. Chop off your penis when you turn 18. Being a teenager is brutal enough without making a spectacle of yourself.


13 posted on 08/22/2014 7:26:19 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (Ebola: Death is a lagging indicator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina
I blame the parent for this, not the kid.

IMO, it's what the end result of untreated Munchausen's by Proxy Syndrome looks like.

14 posted on 08/22/2014 7:39:38 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logitech

PING to today’s column where the veiled threat against me is posted in BarbWire comments section.


15 posted on 08/22/2014 7:50:57 AM PDT by WXRGina (The Founding Fathers would be shooting by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

We are reaching the point where you celebrate the birth of a baby but don’t know if it is a boy or a girl until it is old enough to decide.


16 posted on 08/22/2014 7:59:07 AM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina
Transgenders have very weak relationships with their fathers and naturally gravitate to the closest role model which is their mother.

I read a book by Dr.Joseph Nicholosi: "A Parent's Guide to Preventing Homosexuality" and he says that when such a boy watches a lot of Disney princess movies they can identify with the character and want to dress just like her. This is where cross-dressing begins.

The doctor's solution to the parents is to have the boy and the dad do guy stuff, work on a car together, anything guys would do without mom. And for mom to praise her son's manliness.

He has had great success in helping confused boys before the need to identify as a woman sets in.

17 posted on 08/22/2014 8:11:44 AM PDT by Slyfox (Satan's goal is to rub out the image of God he sees in the face of every human.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

I don’t see why there should be a problem since all teens - male, female, black, white and purple - wear jeans and a t-shirt. Now, if he is wearing a ruffled dress, lace petticoats and mary janes then he has more serious problems. Of course, since the teen uniform is uni-sexed, he’s proving my theory that all these lgbtwhatevers are craving ATTENTION FOR MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!! He would have been free to pursue whatever freak flavor of the week he wished without the school hassling him if he’d worn jeans and a t-shirt but noooooooooo, he intentionally made such a big deal out of it so as to gain national ATTENTION.


18 posted on 08/22/2014 8:47:38 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

As far as children growing out of thinking they’re the opposite sex, I know of at least 3 examples: Kate Hepburn, Willa Cather and Truman Capote. These artistic geniuses all expressed the notion that they were the opposite sex. As a child, Kate insisted on being called “Jimmy,” Cather called herself “Billy” and dressed as a boy and Capote wrote that he felt he was a girl. Hepburn grew up to be a feminine, heterosexual woman while Cather grew into a writer who may or may have been a lesbian. Capote, of course, was an open homosexual. But as adults, none of them claimed to be transgendered. They poured their oddnesses into their art and we, the American people, benefitted. What benefit have we received from “Chaz” Bono and “Chelsea” Manning? Nothing but trouble.


19 posted on 08/22/2014 8:51:55 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

The author of the pseudoscientific post is admitting that the X and Y chromosomes determine sex but that “gender” is determined by genes on other chromosomes. There is, in fact, not a single shred of scientific evidence that this is the case. There’s a great deal of huffing and puffing by those for whom “genetics” is a dictionary entry but that’s about as far as it goes.


20 posted on 08/22/2014 8:52:17 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson