Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Homosexuality Has No Genetic Cause
BarbWire ^ | September 5, 2014 | Jonathon Moseley

Posted on 09/07/2014 7:07:57 PM PDT by WXRGina

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
I love it! He uses the fallacious hypothesis of evolution against the fallacious argument that homosexuals are "born that way." Good column!
1 posted on 09/07/2014 7:07:57 PM PDT by WXRGina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

If homosexuality was genetic, it would have been bred out of the system eons ago.


2 posted on 09/07/2014 7:11:10 PM PDT by jonrick46 (The opium of Communists: other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

If the were a gene, we could cure it.


3 posted on 09/07/2014 7:11:37 PM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

“A homosexuality gene, if it existed, would quickly die out.”

Thats the idea. It’s natures way of saying “Do not reproduce,
you have nothing to contribute to the gene pool”.


4 posted on 09/07/2014 7:12:19 PM PDT by Slambat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46
If homosexuality was genetic, it would have been bred out of the system eons ago.

That's what he writes in the column--sorta.

5 posted on 09/07/2014 7:12:41 PM PDT by WXRGina (The Founding Fathers would be shooting by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

If someone ever discovered a homosexuality gene there are many parents who would abort babies that had it. That would cause liberals’ heads to explode.


6 posted on 09/07/2014 7:13:01 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

The premise of the article is false. There could be an adaptive purpose to homosexuality which escapes the author. Just because the author states otherwise doesn’t make it true. In any case, it is testable, when more people have the entire genome sequenced. There may be, or there may not be, one or more genes for homosexuality. Time will tell. This author is not the final arbiter. A suicide gene has been identified. How come that hasn’t died out?


7 posted on 09/07/2014 7:18:47 PM PDT by coloradan (The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

Woo-woo — where does the lesbian gene come from? same place as the sodomite gene?


8 posted on 09/07/2014 7:18:58 PM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coloradan

BS.


9 posted on 09/07/2014 7:23:05 PM PDT by WXRGina (The Founding Fathers would be shooting by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina
The behaviors conventionally lumped together and described as "homosexual" are variable and diverse. Some include "bisexuality" and others the ability to foster children as a social imperative in circumscribed milieux. There is no core behavior sufficiently orthogonal that it could reasonably be characterized and predicted to have a genetic root.

Beyond that, the idea of "choice" is a dangerous and misleading one. To attribute homosexual orientation, and subsequently, sex, to choice is akin to saying that development of any addiction is a choice. It fails to account for a wealth of empirical knowledge and information about the acquisition of learned responses through instrumental conditioning, imitation, identification, and other powerful processes.

Better to recognize that the constellation of behaviors generally lumped together as "homosexuality" are multiply determined, as are most other complex social behaviors, and to eschew the simplistic binary question of "Genetic--yes or no."

10 posted on 09/07/2014 7:23:40 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

Don’t confuse me with the facts, man!


11 posted on 09/07/2014 7:26:07 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

Anything they can do to validate and defend it they will use. Kinda weird though. I mean, you can’t call a faggot a faggot because they say that’s hate speech, but faggots call each other faggots


12 posted on 09/07/2014 7:26:23 PM PDT by realcleanguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina
Being ‘born’ homosexual is a medical impossibility unless there is a specific gene causing it.

There are lots of environmental causes for congenital conditions. What if the hormone balance in the mother is wrong? Not enough vitamins? Illness during pregnancy?

13 posted on 09/07/2014 7:27:40 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (The IRS: either criminally irresponsible in backup procedures or criminally responsible of coverup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coloradan

What suicide gene? Please be specific.


14 posted on 09/07/2014 7:28:27 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

According to the compelling logic of the article,
homosexuality would be a non-beneficial mutation,
like Tay–Sachs disease among Ashkenazi Jews,
except that we just need to find a way to
rid their bodies of the gene before they
accidentally pass the trait onto an
offspring during one of the drug-
and sex-fueled binges.

Hey, we’re trying to save them here!

/s


15 posted on 09/07/2014 7:29:07 PM PDT by WKTimpco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

Who said there needs to be a “gene”?

Homosexuality can be one of many defects, which means, yes, you ccan be born with this defect. Not something that has to pass down, but occurs in nature occassionally, for any number of reasons.

I do not know if it is “genetic” or a choice. I see no problem either way. Personally, I do not know why anyone in his RIGHT MIND would choose to be homo. See? It can be a birth issue, just like many birth defects, including maybe just fall-out from some mental issues.

Nowadays may have some exceptions, since homos are making such huge inroads they have convinced some innocent young people it is “hip” to be a defective. But outside this late insanity in society at large, I do not think anyone would choose it.


16 posted on 09/07/2014 7:30:28 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

Premise is demonstrably false. Instead of thinking about a “homosexual” genetic defect, apply the same logic to other “genetic defects”.

Ask yourself this: “Are there any genetic defects which typically prevent reproduction because they are fatal?”

The answer is “Yes,” and many can be named.

So why are these genes still persistant?


17 posted on 09/07/2014 7:30:30 PM PDT by Rebel_Ace (Tags?!? Tags?!? We don' neeeed no stinkin' Tags!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1
True, there is no Gay or Lesbian gene per se. As the egg & Sperm unite, there are many traits developed, physical and mental. About 2% of physical males born have many female traits and same with females with male traits. Occurs in the animal kingdom too.

Look at the muzzies, they allowed the marrying of cousins etc., and look how they went down hill into idiots.

Why are some people tall and some short, some smart and some dumb. Its genetics, same with sexuality.

18 posted on 09/07/2014 7:31:08 PM PDT by stubernx98 (cranky, but reasonable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

well, what about the gene that makes them talk that way?;)


19 posted on 09/07/2014 7:31:17 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
There are lots of environmental causes for congenital conditions. What if the hormone balance in the mother is wrong? Not enough vitamins? Illness during pregnancy?

It's sin, period. You really CAN over-think these things, you know.

20 posted on 09/07/2014 7:31:19 PM PDT by WXRGina (The Founding Fathers would be shooting by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson