Posted on 11/06/2014 10:50:24 AM PST by kingu
I realize that not everyone is into activism, but I think this is one that most of us can get behind. A yearly requirement for all levels of government to nullify a body of laws each and every 4th of July.
It might be as simple as just putting to rest old blue laws, but really, the meat of it should be rolling back all those inane rules and regulations that effectively mean every person commits a felony just through normal day to day living.
Yes, it'll take a lot of work to put together a list of laws for each 4th's axing, and of course, there are plenty of people who pushed those laws in the first place who will want to defend them. Great, let them defend them, let them justify their continued existence.
Or,
Require that two existing laws be repealed for every new law passed.
--obviously much of the criminal code could be passed without much debate (murder, rape, etc.) but much could be let expire---
Oh, and no new law may contain more words than are included in the body of the original Constitution of the United states of America.
I have long harbored the idea that no law can be proposed unless there is some other law that will be eliminated at the same time. I think that there are already enough laws on the books. Initially it will be easy to eliminate some old unenforced laws but eventually it might become more difficult. Good! the pols need to think before they legislate.
That’s been floated around for a very long time; only problem is, they can hide what they’re repealing. They also really don’t get the recognition for it. By making it a yearly activity, some politicians can actually crow about it, maybe feel good about appearing in that 4th of July parade. It also makes a list that people can see...
‘What? The only laws you could THINK to cancel were weight limits for school text books that are carried home daily by students?’
By my count that’s about 4,300 words
I often argue for absolute sunset on all acts, regulations, and orders. Nothing should remain in force without explicit reaffirmation. I think something like this is absolutely required for the continued existence of a free society and as a check on returning to despotism.
There are other ideas with similar concept. For example Heinlein posited a bi-cameral system where one body passed laws and the other reversed them, creating a class of politicians with incentive to reduce the burden instead of adding to it. The reversers were more powerful than the enablers by a certain degree. This makes the veto obsolete (and possibly turns the chief executive into the chief administrator). The idea of having a special day to repeal ro forgive is ancient, eg consider Jubilee or manumission with a new king, etc.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.