Question is: Why was this hidden?
That makes absolutely no SENSE to me. Absolutely no sense.
Maybe Bush and his cabinet just figured the left is going to hate them anyways. Maybe they didn’t care. Or maybe, just maybe.....the fix was always in. Money being passed between hands. It’s our turn now boys. You’ll get your turn in 2016! Then us again in 2024! Keep it fair, keep it balanced. Keep them divided and we all win. The ultimate ponzi scheme.
Well, maybe because the GOPe wanted a ‘rat president to destroy the country and hatred of Bush would do just that,
and Bush was in on it?
No, it doesn’t make any sense.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/carter-andress/why-the-world-did-not-know-about-wmd-in-iraq-/print/
Two words.
Karl.
Rove.
“That makes absolutely no SENSE to me. Absolutely no sense.”
It does if you consider the USA was somehow involved in Iraq obtaining those chemicals.
Ask Valerie Plame.
I use to think that kind of talk was tin foil hat conspiracy stuff. Now, I'm not so sure. It really does seem like the elites vs the citizens.
Remember the 2000 election. Bush was facing an all-out assault on the legitimacy of his election. "Selected, not elected", etc. This quickly became the RAT and media party's official stance. The GOP remained silent, not that anyone would give them publicity, anyway.
After 9/11, talk of legitimacy quickly vanished. More slowly, "illegal war" became the RAT's official policy. Of course, they had to wait a couple of years to make sure the US didn't achieve a lightning victory, and for everyone to forget the near-unanimous support the RATs first gave to the war.
Besides, there was soon trillions of dollars in play, as opposed to the nickel-dime rewards of impeaching Bush for "illegitimacy".