Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What if Obama decides to ignore the courts, and move ahead with amnesty?
one man's opinion...

Posted on 05/27/2015 7:23:09 AM PDT by ken5050

Success in politics, as in war and chess, requires the ability to plan several moves ahead. As Obama awaits court decisions on several of his key policy initiatives, it’s surprising that there has been little or no speculation as to just what exactly was he thinking?


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; illegals; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Truth29

“...question all tyrants face... who will the army back?”

Correct. And this is a possible warm up/trial run before the declaration of a “third term” and a totalitarian third world type of dictatorship is established.

Right now we are in the throes of a “bloodless” (the blood is there- it is in the inner cities where those who are being used to remain in a permanent underclass are killing each other) ongoing revolutionary coup with nothing and no one to stop it. Will the army stop it? Maybe not, it has been infiltrated as well ...

Not to sound cynical, but things are far worse than appears on the surface.


21 posted on 05/27/2015 7:45:43 AM PDT by stonehouse01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Obama will not explicitly defy the Supreme Court. What is likely, however, is that he will make an "accommodation," claim he has adjusted his program appropriately, and order federal agencies to implement the "accommodation." With a year and a half left, there will not be time for another challenge to progress through the courts before he leaves.
22 posted on 05/27/2015 7:47:44 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Then you take a page from the discordant actions of this current administration. You do it and stall until the damage is done.


23 posted on 05/27/2015 7:48:15 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Note: Any move to take the 5th. Circuit Court of Appeals Decision to SCOTUS Justice Scalia will review it — he will likely turn it down for a full SCOTUS hearing ... send it back to the Appeals Court and to Judge Hanen at the District court - where it would await a full trail - that could take until past obama’s term in office... So - the unconstitutional obama tried to sneak into existence would basically die

Unless the Fool trying to blatantly continue - where upon contempt charges will be filed — again he Sec DHS and the Lawyers and others... but not likely against obama.


24 posted on 05/27/2015 7:53:25 AM PDT by ICCtheWay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sphinx

..”make an accommodation”

You must have a crystal ball. I agree as I think that’s the most plausible and likely result.


25 posted on 05/27/2015 7:56:14 AM PDT by reviled downesdad (Mother Teresa on abortion: "It's poverty that children must die so people can live as they choose")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Andrew Jackson ignored the Supreme Court.

http://scottsconstitutionalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/2012/03/was-andrew-jackson-right-to-ignore.html

26 posted on 05/27/2015 7:57:54 AM PDT by Cry if I Wanna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reviled downesdad

And the “accommodation” may amount to little more than changing the font on the executive order. But it will kick the ball past the end of his term.


27 posted on 05/27/2015 8:05:46 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
He will and America has its first dictator. King Obama can order anything and he has the force to make it his law.
28 posted on 05/27/2015 8:11:37 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

There is precedent. Andrew Jackson and the Trail of Tears.


29 posted on 05/27/2015 8:49:10 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

If the Senate had impeached Clinton, Al Gore would have been President until 2004. If Hillary is toast then the Dems have no present alternative. But if Obama were impeached they could run Biden for reelection (George Soros, are you listening?).


30 posted on 05/27/2015 8:54:35 AM PDT by Sicvee (Sicvee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

And if so, then what? What’s the Plan B?

**********
Get his like minded pals in the Republican leadership to help him out.


31 posted on 05/27/2015 9:02:15 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Exactly right. Who is going to stop him? The courts can only decide against him. Republicans will NEVER impeach him.


32 posted on 05/27/2015 9:03:55 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

The laws are whatever he says they are. Congress hides in the shadows and allows him to get away with it.


33 posted on 05/27/2015 9:05:22 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

If the Senate had impeached Clinton, Al Gore would have been President until 2004. If Hillary is toast then the Dems have no present alternative. But if Obama were impeached they could run Biden for reelection (George Soros, are you listening?).


34 posted on 05/27/2015 9:09:49 AM PDT by Sicvee (Sicvee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
What if Obama decides to ignore the courts, and move ahead with amnesty?


What if?

Where has the writer been for the last 6 years, obama could care less about what it's it does what it ants and the republicans applaud it and beg it to let them be it's monica.

35 posted on 05/27/2015 9:25:15 AM PDT by The_Republic_Of_Maine (In an Oligarchy, the serfs don't count.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Might as well annex the nation of Mexico. Might as well get their land and natural resources too.


36 posted on 05/27/2015 10:57:11 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Barack Obama is not inarguably sane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson