Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What SCOTUScare means to you
Canada Free Press ^ | 06/29/15 | Herman Cain

Posted on 06/29/2015 5:25:49 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony

Higher costs, less care, fewer choices. And lots more federal control

The recent Supreme Court ruling on health insurance subsidies means they upheld the “stupidity of the American people” (as Jonathan Gruber would say, and has), and for the third time the Court stretched the law instead of interpreting the law.

How the Court arrived at this 6-3 decision has baffled many observers, and the ruling opinion written by Justice Roberts stuns those of us who believe that certain words matter, as Rob said last week.

But the words of Justice Antonio Scalia in his the dissenting opinion had plenty of meaning:

“Having transformed two major parts of the law, the Court today has turned its attention to a third. The Act that Congress passed makes tax credits available only on an ‘Exchange established by the State.’ This Court, however, concludes that this limitation would prevent the rest of the Act from working as well as hoped. So it rewrites the law to make tax credits available everywhere. We should start calling this law SCOTUScare.”

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Health/Medicine; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: obamacare; scotuscare

1 posted on 06/29/2015 5:25:49 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Frankly, I’m gonna stop saying SCOTUS from now on. The way it has been ruling, it deserves the name SCROTUS.


2 posted on 06/29/2015 5:30:08 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

ScotusCare will crash. It’s already not working. The only thing to save it will be massive new taxes or new forced involvement laws from the Congress. With Boehner/McConnel in charge, that’s a real possibility, but those subsidies only dealt with the monthly premium. They don’t deal with the huge deductibles which are so steep that people really don’t have health care. They’ll have to pay out of pocket except in catastrophic/extreme care when these will kick in.

Which is what younger folks were always saying anyway. If we want to buy an ultra cheap catastrophic plan, that’s our business.


3 posted on 06/29/2015 5:30:28 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray for their victory or quit saying you support our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Roberts is a Harvard moron, which makes him worse than the average idiot. I wonder how many conservative friends he has after shooting his rulings down their throats. I bet he hangs with the same crowd as kagan, and Ginsburg. I can’t imagine anyone else besides a liberal truly would want to hang with him. I mean really. His rulings are truly an assault upon his brethren.


4 posted on 06/29/2015 5:36:32 AM PDT by inchworm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Blackmail. Does anyone actually believe that the FBI quit amassing blackmail files on public officials?


5 posted on 06/29/2015 5:38:18 AM PDT by Seruzawa (All those memories will be lost,in time, like tears in rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

“SCROTUS”?

Because it has none?


6 posted on 06/29/2015 5:39:10 AM PDT by SMARTY ("What is freedom? To have the will to be responsible for one's self. "M. Stirner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

To be crude, all bag and no balls.


7 posted on 06/29/2015 5:40:00 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
It means 6 of the 9 Judges are not Justices, but are political hacks !
Remove the 6 REPROBATES !
8 posted on 06/29/2015 5:42:03 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
Have you ever in your life seen such an out-of-touch, bogus, corrupt, shamefully duplicitous and OUT-OF-THEIR-DEPTH bunch of people all in ONE place?

And THAT is the US Supreme Court.

They honestly BELIEVE they speak for the citizens of the United States.

Does any ONE of them know the price of a cup of coffee in downtown Podunk? Does a single one of them know or interact with average American citizens in any way?

They live in their rarefied and artificial bubble thinking they actually KNOW what the issues mean to Americans.

They are SO politicized in everything they do that they are nothing in the least LIKE what a Supreme Court OUGHT to be!

9 posted on 06/29/2015 5:50:57 AM PDT by SMARTY ("What is freedom? To have the will to be responsible for one's self. "M. Stirner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

In my lifetime, I never would have thought you could pack so much duplicity, so much deceit and so much evil in 61.4 square miles of land mass.

We’d be better off declaring in a blighted area and demolishing the whole thing.


10 posted on 06/29/2015 5:54:30 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
What SCOTUScare means to you

Are we sure he didn't say SCOTUSscare?

11 posted on 06/29/2015 6:18:31 AM PDT by MosesKnows (Love many, trust few, and always paddle your own canoe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

All of the Justices are Ivy League or near Ivy League (Stanford) educated, particularly for their law degrees. Harvard and Yale dominate. No one attended a state university or regional private university law school. There are no justices who belong to a protestant denomination. All adhere to either the Catholic or Jewish faith. There may be skin and gender diversity on the court but they all belong to the elitist Ivy League urban class that rules the USA.


12 posted on 06/29/2015 8:19:19 AM PDT by Soul of the South (Yesterday is gone. Today will be what we make of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South

13 posted on 06/29/2015 8:34:42 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

The hubrus of SCOTUS hiding behind judicial immunity is intolerable. Divinig the thoughts of Congresscritters who couldn’t read the bill in order to ‘interpret’ their intent is beyond implausible. It’s unbefrackinglievable.


14 posted on 06/29/2015 8:44:46 AM PDT by RideForever (Recent purchaser of Deranged Go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson